Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Must-know: Openings

Submitted by WGM Natalia_Pogonina on Mon, 08/09/2010 at 11:12pm.

Starting from today, I will dedicate my next three columns to studying the opening, middlegame and endgame and provide you with tips on how to work on all the three stages. Let’s start with the opening.

The opening defines the course of the game. There are lots of opening lines, so the first problem each player faces is “which ones should I choose”?

Opening choice

1. Let’s consider two options: a) for beginners b) for more advanced players

For those who are new to chess: you will need an opening book or, more modern and convenient, a chess database. I am using both Chess Assistant and ChessBase (they are the best ones available). Chess.com also has its own online database which could prove to be quite helpful.


You had better start with one of the main moves, either 1.e4 or 1.d4. Check out the opening tree, review some top players’ games and see what type of positions you like. If you are a complete newcomer, it could prove to be tricky since you won’t be able to tell the difference between them. In this case you might have to resort to your friends’ or coach’s help.

For stronger players: some people are quite proficient in chess, but somehow they never paid attention to their opening, or decided to switch from one system to another. While a novice may not be aware of his style, an experienced player knows it. Choose an opening according to your playing manner. For example, a positional player would be in his element in a Slav Defense, while a tactical player might prefer the King’s Indian.

2. The next step after choosing an opening is reviewing the variations. Study the main lines using a computer opening tree on opening book, then pay attention to the popular deviations. Make notes of your choices (using a pgn file). The key to mastering an opening is knowing the main plans for both sides and main set-ups. You can find those either in books, or by looking at some typical games. It is very useful to pick a role model – a strong master who is loyal to a certain opening and whose games provide insight on how to play it. For example, Alexei Shirov often plays the Ruy Lopez with Bc5, so I have looked through many of his games to improve my understanding of this opening and the main plans.

Create your opening tree which will consist of the main variation and the subvariations. Some people prefer to have a file for each opening (Black against 1.e4, Black against 1.d4, etc.). Others like to keep all the info together (so as not to lose anything or have trouble searching for it). As long as your trees are small enough, one file is probably the best option.

3. After studying the main lines and learning the plans you have to memorize the ideas and play some training games. Of course, you may skip this part and head straight to a tournament. However, playing some training games beforehand will help you get a touch of the opening and avoid losing in a silly way (thus saving your rating and self-esteem). You may either challenge an anonymous player over the Internet, or train with a sparring partner (e.g. a friend of similar strength). The latter option is better since it allows you to agree in advance what you will be working on. A player on the Internet won’t be aware of your plans and may play something totally different. Playing otb is much better than online since it imitates the conditions you will be facing at a real tournament. Time control – standard or 1 hour per game. In the Internet forget about bullet or blitz, instead play some rapid games (15-25 min per game). 1 hour per game online is dull, bad for one’s eyes and also increases the risk of confronting a cheater (who will spoil all your pleasure). Btw, that’s another reason for playing “live”.

These 3 stages are pretty much all for the prevailing majority of chess players, but pros will need to go over 2 more.

4. Your proprietary analysis of the opening, searching for new plans and novelties

Chess has a myriad of variations, so even the extensive modern theory has spots where one can come up with something new. Nowadays chess engines offer a chance to players of any strength to find something worthy. Analyze your opening, widen and deepen the opening tree, watch out for interesting continuations. This will take your opening preparation to a new level and improve tournament results. Having a strong human partner next to you during the process can also be useful since chess engines are sometimes suggesting very inhuman lines, while a man can spot something completely different and promising.

5. Studying a back-up opening

To make opening preparation tougher for your opponents and to have some other line to fall back upon (when your main one needs to be fixed, when you need to play for a draw/win, choose something your opponent doesn’t like, etc.), you could study a back-up opening. Of course, this comes after becoming proficient in the first one, otherwise you will simply have two half-baked openings. A reminder: these final two stages are for master-level players. Others will benefit more from becoming well-rounded in chess and learning key middlegame and endgame principles.

Let’s take a look at another game of mine from the Mullhouse-2010 GM event and pay special attention to the opening:

 


My play in the opening was a critical ingredient in my overall success. Having prepared a new variation and found a new way of treating 15.Qd3, I managed to lure my opponent into a position which he wasn’t familiar with. Naturally, under such circumstances he quickly ended up being worse and eventually losing.

» posted in Opening Theory
« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Comments:

by Jake-2k7 - 13 months ago
International Canada
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 30

Great article

by Head_Hunter - 17 months ago
East Orange, NJ United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 535

I have been playing chess off and on for more than 30 years, but I've never had any formal training. Because of this (I think), there are two terms that are used by books on openings that kinda stump me. Those terms are advantage and weakness. Now, the obvious advantage or weakness, say material, are easy for me to determine, which is why I play a lot of gambits. In my humble opinion, a good knowledge of a few decent gambit opening systems is enough to get a rating up to about 1800, but that's about it. Beyond that, it seems that the player who can recognize his or her 'advantages' and his or her opponent's 'weaknesses' the soonest wins.

Could this be a key to good opening play? Steer play to positions where there are advantages and weaknesses that are familiar to you?

by dixon400 - 17 months ago
lagos Nigeria
Member Since: Jul 2010
Member Points: 17

wow

by marinas - 17 months ago
Paris France
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 226

Thank you for good article!Bolshoje spasibo chto ne jaleete vremeni i sil i delites s nami svoim opetom.

by WGM Natalia_Pogonina - 17 months ago
Saratov Russia
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 2221

@rightonyourtail Thanks, corrected!

@usher There are two types of opening trees: 1) the opening book in Fritz/ChessBase/Chess Assistant etc. which has all the opening moves that have been played in rated games so far 2) your own opening book, i.e. the lines you play. Of course, it's a matter of taste which environment to choose, but most players go with either ChessBase or ChessAssistant.

@RRicnesh This opening does not offer White any advantage, why play it at all?

@ Severe_Snake You should probably play the openings you like and understand. Besides, if you are not a pro, fun should be the primary factor. Why force yourself into doing something you don't enjoy? If you had been an aspiring IM seeking a way to become a well-rounded player, I would have probably answered in a different way... Smile

@ pleasant Well, I try to reply to most of the comments, but have been busy with the Russia vs China match. Also, I get over a hundred messages per day, some of them requesting expert analysis or developing a personal chess improvement plan. Smile Takes time & energy to answer...

by pleasant - 17 months ago
leyden, ma United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 22

I would be pleased to read some responses to readers' comments - even by other readers. As it is, I am left dangling, having little or no idea whether a comment deserves further attention or can be simply noted and forgotten in passing on. {Natalia_Pogonina's initial essays are always most welcome and useful in any case.

by VLMJ - 17 months ago
Mililani, Hawaii United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 209

Ms Pogonina, I'm appalled at the comments about grammar, reference your column.  They are very petty to me, especially when the  grammar in no way makes a difference in the correctness and content of the lesson you have offered.  You have kindly taken the time to help us in our chess and have been successful, considering the other comments given.  I am grateful and, I believe, most of us on Chess.com are.  Keep up the great work.  Mahlo nui loa.

by Realpolitik - 17 months ago
Philadelphia, PA United States
Member Since: Aug 2010
Member Points: 59

Very helpful, thanks!

by KELL1980 - 17 months ago
United Kingdom
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 12

You are a legend for these articles!  

by usher - 17 months ago
International
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 166

Hi, you told us about creating an opening tree, but what is the best way to create one? Is there a certain program (like Fritz?) to do so?

Is it helpful to write down a number of important variations or writing comments on the resulting positions?

thanks :)

by DENVERHIGH - 17 months ago
Northern California United States
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 1592

Thanks for the article.

Choosing a openning is quite hard if the other player chosses to play something else.

 

                           DENVER

by chessdoggblack - 17 months ago
New Orleans, LA. / Houston, TX. United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 104

First time viewing your articles.  Much needed advice for me - problems for me are always my openings.

by rightonyourtail - 17 months ago
boston United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 2

I think you meant to write "latter" instead of "former" during point #3.

by RTurietta - 17 months ago
Las Cruces, NM United States
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 41

As always, insightful and practical, thanks, Natalia!  Smile

by WGM Natalia_Pogonina - 17 months ago
Saratov Russia
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 2221

@rickywong It happens all the time. Knowing key plans and set-ups helps in such cases. You just have to adjust your plans in accordance with the deviation played by your opponent.

@ RainbowRising Blitz is good in terms of seeing what variations you have forgotten, or finding unexplored lines. But for actually practicing a particular opening rapid or longer time controls are better.

@ ChessuBet Some player are more conservative (e.g. playing an opening or two all life long), some change their repertoire all the time. It depends on the character and memory of a person.

Sometimes unexpected moves occur (since one can't remember everything). However, in most cases you can pretty much predict what is going to happen.

@S_Ong That is determined by your choices in the game, not opening. Some people like playing cautiously and building up tiny advantages, other look out for aggresive breakthroughs, sacrifices, mating attacks. If you have played a lot of games, it's easy to see...

@ Twobit Start with symmetrial replies (1.e4 e5; 1.d4 d5). These are classics, and teaching a novice to play, let's say, the Sicialian, hurts his potential chess understanding.

@ciaochow "or" instead of "on", sorry. Smile

by ModernCalvin - 17 months ago
United States
Member Since: Mar 2010
Member Points: 773

@marcelo77

Of course! This is why I specified that all articles should be proofread. I doubt erik and staff want to hire an editor for thread posts Tongue out

by ciaochow - 17 months ago
New York United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 77

Great article.  You say "[s]tudy the main lines using a computer opening tree on opening book."  Is opening book some type of software and, if so, where is it available?  Thanks.

by sirnitwood - 17 months ago
Wales United Kingdom
Member Since: Apr 2010
Member Points: 1

Interesting article but with all these variations my computer which is at least  10 yrs old did become a little confused!!

by Parotic_Groove - 17 months ago
Western United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 269

An interesting game.

I can really see how White was out of their element ... there seems to be an  "knot" between White's Rook, Knight and White Bishop all on the a-b-and-d files respectively. This "knot" keeps White's pieces inactive since the Rook cannot move without losing the Knight, the Knight cannot move without losing the Rook or the White Bishop, and the White Bishop is cornered behind the d-file. It's gonna take White more moves to "untie that knot" ... losing moves as well as cadence in the process ... both elements of which are now part of Black's advantage.

An interesting game indeed ... I like the psychology and the "lure" behind the tactics. White must've thought they could've finished the game by dominated the 7th rank with both Rooks while losing a Knight in the process ... it would be interesting to see the time stamping on this game to see if time played a factor in White's seemingly impulsive "hog attack" on the 7th rank.

Once again ... it was nice to see a game from the opening moves ... I probably would have taken the pawn at b5 a lot sooner.

Thank you.

by SmakcHappy - 17 months ago
Smyrna, Tennessee United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 30

Ms. Pogonina, it is, as always, a pleasure to learn from you. Mahalo Nui Loa for all your submissions!

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.