Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Not All Draws Are Boring

Submitted by GM vbhat on Mon, 10/19/2009 at 12:30pm.

Before playing in the Montreal International this fall, I spent a good amount of time studying strong GM games (usually Kasparov games) and middlegames, but I also spent some time reviewing some technical endgames and my openings.

For such a strong event, I felt like I needed to make sure I could get out of the opening with a playable position against everybody. It never feels good to lose, but for me, losing a game without ever having had a chance is an extremely bad feeling.

With that in mind, one of the openings that I had to focus on was the 5.b3 Semi-Slav - it normally arises after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 e6 4.e3 Nf6 5.b3. This is a line advocated by Avrukh in his excellent book: Grandmaster Repertoire, Vol 1. I had faced it a couple times previously against 2630 opposition and had lost both games (the previous time being against Vescovi - you can read my comments on that game here: http://www.chess.com/article/view/losing-the-thread). As most of my opponents could play (or only played) 1.d4, there was a good chance this line would come up and I felt I was pretty well prepared.

However, I didn't get a single 5.b3 Semi-Slav in the entire tournament! In my 9th round game against Mark, I had a feeling he'd go for that line, but my guess was quite wrong. As he mentioned to me after the game, because I had lost twice to that line before, he figured that I had done some real work on it and would be well prepared to face it. Maybe that's what the other guys were thinking as well.

The opening surprise he did get in was quite unpleasant to face, and while the game ended in a draw, it was certainly not a boring one!

Question 1: What would you play for White after 9...Bc3?

Question 2: What would you play for Black after 10.Ba3?

Question 3: What would you play for Black after 13.Rxc6?

Question 4: What would you play for White after 16...Qc3?

And here's the entire game in one viewer:

» posted in Middlegame
 

Comments:

by dpenaranda - 2 years ago
Costa Rica
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 135

Thanks Vinay for you kind answer.

by milsrilion - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 90

Great article, Vinay!

"This is like a Josh Waitzkin game that I remember. He was thinking so much about the upcoming endgame, he failed to notice that there were some really powerful captures."

Isn't it the one where Waitzkin didn't take his opponent's rook that hung in a corner of the board?

by nithubangalore - 2 years ago
bangalore India
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 12

this is how i wish to play....

by andmark - 2 years ago
Somewhere in England
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 81

 StupidDrip95, good point.

by StupidDrip95 - 2 years ago
NJ United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 1510

This is like a Josh Waitzkin game that I remember. He was thinking so much about the upcoming endgame, he failed to notice that there were some really powerful captures.

by andmark - 2 years ago
Somewhere in England
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 81

Hi Vinay, for question two, because of Mark's good counter, I would simply win material by doing Bxa1.

by bosco - 2 years ago
Poland
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 237

[ INSERT AWSOME COMMENT]

by satanicwarmaster - 2 years ago
valletta Malta
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 73

nice analysis, thanks.

by khpa21 - 2 years ago
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 1234

Kingfisher, count the material balance at the end of your line again.

 

To the author: It seems that after 13. Rxc6 Bxa3, White has an interesting alternative in 14. Rxf6, attempting to sacrifice the Exchange yet again. Is there any reason for White to avoid this?

by Kingfisher - 2 years ago
Johannesburg South Africa
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 1929

By all means correct me, but doesn't

13... Bxd2+ 14. Qxd2 Qxd2+ 15. Kxd2 bxc6 16. Nc7+ Kd8 17. Nxa8 Bb7

win a piece? What am I missing?

by GM vbhat - 2 years ago
Richmond, CA United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 233

Alpha122Alpha - Yup, 13...Bxa3 is possible and might be even better than what I did. Take a look at the variations in the notes to see why, but generally speaking, White has an improvement on the game continuation after 13...bxc6. Black's going to be slightly worse with best play after either continuation, just a matter of choosing which kind of worse position you'd rather go with.

 

Pawnkeeper - I didn't like 9...0-0 because of 10.Bb2. 10.Qc2 stops 10...Bc3 as well, but it would put the queen on the open c-file. Once Black develops his Bc8 and Nb8, ...Rc8 will gain a tempo. The difference between 9.Bb2 and 10.Bb2 is that the e4-square is now covered by the Bd3, so ...Ne4 isn't a real problem. Still, it might have been better that what I did.

by pawnkeeper - 2 years ago
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1012

Why not 9.....0-0 before Bc3? I know Q to c2 stops black.

by alpha122alpha - 2 years ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 323

after 13. Rxc6, is it possible for Black to reject the Rook offer?  (e.g. Bxa3)

by GM vbhat - 2 years ago
Richmond, CA United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 233

Dpenaranda - that's also reasonable, but I'd prefer to take on d7 with the king for two reasons:

(1) The main reason is that by clearing the e8-square right away, White doesn't time to get his king away to safety without giving up the d3-square. For example, 16...Kxd7 17.a3, then 17...Rhe8+ and 18...Nd3. If 16...Nxd7, though - White could try 17.a3 and Black lacks the check on e8. After 17...Nc6, White could put his king on d3 and avoid any big problems.

(2) Also, while White's king is a bit exposed on the open e-file, Black's king isn't really that exposed on the d7-square. By keeping the knight on e4, Black gains some options of ...Ne4 or ...Ng4 in some positions.

by dpenaranda - 2 years ago
Costa Rica
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 135

Hi vinay
In a variant you proposed to play (10. Rb1, Bxd4 11. exd4, Qxe7! 12. Qe2, Qxe3+ 13. Kxe2, Nc6 14. Bb2, Nb4 15. Bb5+ Bd7 16. Bxd7 Kxd7)
Why not take the Bishop with the Knight (16. ..., Nxd7) and then 17. ..., O-O to activate the rooks taking advantage of white's king is exposed and cannot castle.

Thanks.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.