Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Positional Sacrifice

  • WGM Natalia_Pogonina
  • | Dec 6, 2011
  • | 11374 views
  • | 30 comments

A positional sacrifice implies giving away material for long-term positional advantages. Such exchange operations don’t lead to a straightforward win of the game or material. While any piece can be positionally sacrificed, the most common victims are pawns and exchanges (i.e. rooks). There are all sorts of advantages one can gain by performing a positional sacrifice: control over key squares/files/ranks, rapid development, spoiling the placement of the opponent’s pieces and his pawn structure and so on.

As you might be guessing, positional sacrifices are risky. If the advantages gained don’t compensate for the invested material, your plan will fail. Therefore, before sacrificing you have to:

1.      Carefully evaluate the position, including: decide whether the sacrifice is a must-play one, or you have other options; how significant are the benefits? ; what is your plan after the sacrifice?; calculate variations. The more experience and positional understanding you have, the quicker this procedure can be performed. Some sacrifices can be made “with your hand”, i.e. in blitz mode. Nonetheless, don’t be in a rush to play such a flashy move.

2.      Check your psychological state. Any positional sacrifice involves taking risks, and you must make sure you are not afraid of that. If you don’t feel confident enough, it is better to avoid sacrificing. Otherwise even a correct sacrifice may lead you to a loss.

Also, you must be prepared for the possible changes in the course of the game. For example, if previously the position was quiet, after the sacrifice things can become complicated, and you will have to play very precisely and consistently, without making a single mistake. However, in some positions the pattern of the game remains the same even though a sacrifice has been made.

Today I will share with you one more game from the European Team Chess Championship’11. Two positional sacrifices took place there. In the first place a pawn was offered for a few positional pluses: space advantage, bad bishop on c8, blocked pawn on d7 and some weak dark squares. Then an exchange was given up for the opportunity of placing the knight on d6, thus cutting Black’s position into two virtually unconnected parts. In both cases the sacrifices were justified, as the advantages gained were substantial enough.

Comments


  • 10 months ago

    WGM Natalia_Pogonina

    Let’s stay in touch on social networks! Here are my official accounts:

    Twitter
    YouTube
    Facebook:
    Account 1, Account 2, Account 3
    VKontakte
    LiveJournal
    Google+

  • 2 years ago

    curtainrail

    I’ve sacrificed a knight in a correspondence game I’m currently playing. I just hope against hope it turns out to be a positional sacrifice and not the massive blunder I thought it was when I realised what I’d doneEmbarassed.

  • 2 years ago

    darshandatta

    Interesting game...
  • 2 years ago

    TOKALEV

    Is this course for begineer?

  • 2 years ago

    aspen101

    Are there any easy ways to understanding tempos ?

  • 2 years ago

    elyar91

    congrulations for game! :) i think i must use also 9.Nad in my games.. i make so many mistakes in the beginning of games :S

    thanks :)

  • 2 years ago

    dkc_dark

    I See. :] Nice. Thanks For Helping Us. :]

  • 2 years ago

    dnb1103

    Thaks a lot!

  • 2 years ago

    notre

    Dear Natalia,

           Amazing! I love it when you have mention also the need for us to evaluate the psychological readiness of the player which means that chess is not only a mere science but of the Art also. Thank you very much madame. I gladly appreciate your concept. May God bless you more madame.

     

    Respectfully yours,

    Robert Funtenares

  • 2 years ago

    nodonttouchme

    natalia can give me a positional sacrifice.

  • 2 years ago

    loved

    I would have done the same at move 30. Is f4 best? Also, perhps better than 32 a x b3 is 32 B x b3. 

  • 2 years ago

    nyLsel

    Nice article, and good game!

  • 2 years ago

    Assisan

    good stuff!

  • 2 years ago

    IdiotProof

    what a raw game its always nice to know im not the only genius out there

  • 2 years ago

    Elubas

    A solid article. I enjoyed the game. My only problem with it is that it almost makes me think of a chess textbook, containing definitions and ideas you hear in almost any chess book. For this reason it didn't really stand out to me.

  • 2 years ago

    gmanlloyd

    The knight,bishop,and rook gives us a clasic example of teamwork at it's best.Surprised

  • 2 years ago

    ilikeboomers

    mating net huh?

  • 2 years ago

    superagente86

    FIRST WITH KURSOVA IS GOOD,A SINCERE GREETINGS,jose

  • 2 years ago

    NM GreenLaser

    This is a fine game to illustrate the title. The positional theme after 22.Rxd4! threads through the game. Just one thing: In the note after 32...Ra8, ( 32... f5 33. Rf3 ( 33. Rg3+ Kh8 34. Nxf7+ Kh7 35. Nd6 f4 ) 33... Kg7 34. Nxf5+ Kg6 35. Nd6 f5 36. Rf4 Kg7 37. Kh2 ( 37. Nxf5+? Rxf5 38. Rxf5 d6 ) ) the last move (d6) must be d5.

  • 2 years ago

    Chess_Lover11

    Nice game. Smile

Back to Top

Post your reply: