Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Rock, Paper, Scissors

Submitted by WGM Natalia_Pogonina on Tue, 02/23/2010 at 1:40am.

One of the reasons behind the “nemeses and customers” theory is that each chess player has his own style. It reminds me of the “Rock, Paper, Scissors” game where there is no one dominant item.

 

The main three chess characters are:
•    Positional guy. A solid player with a great positional understanding. Maneuvering, finding the right spots for his pieces, creating minor weaknesses – that is his cup of coffee. Unless he blunders something, you will most probably end up being strangled by his powerful chess grasp. Example: Kramnik.
•    Tactical guy. Hot, impatient, “attack-attack-attack.” He likes sacrifices, open positions with lots of tactical shots in the air, double-edged games. Always aims for the king, often succeeds, sometimes ends up in a wrecked position and down material. Example: Chigorin.
•    Calculator. A universal player who is a nerveless killer trying to find the best move in every position. He sees very many moves ahead and uses this to his advantage. Traps, tricky combinations, unpredictable moves. Oops, where did your knight go? The only problem for such people is that they are not chess engines. They still make mistakes, their calculations are not always perfect. Example: Kasparov

 

kasparov-kramnik1.jpg

Vladimir Kramnik and Garry Kasparov, London, 2000

 
When people of the same style collide, the more skillful one usually wins. However, if they play differently, a lot depends on psychology and cunning. For instance, in the 2000 London World Championship match Kramnik managed to lure Kasparov with Black into relatively dull Berlin endgames where Kramnik felt like a fish in water. Kasparov was getting frustrated by not being able to win a single game, but was too proud to admit it and choose a different opening. Sounds very simple, but this was one of the main reasons why Garry, probably the greatest chess player ever, lost his crown!


Therefore, it is very important to dictate the game, put pressure on your opponent and make him/her play the type of positions you like. That is a very serious advantage!


Example 1
A young NM is playing with White against a wizened A-class grandpa. He is anxious to finish the game as quickly as possible. Nonetheless, the old man is fighting back: his position is a bit worse, but very solid. The youngster gets excited about a kingside attack and offers a piece sacrifice. What a surprise – his opponent declines it and offers the young man an endgame with a slight advantage. The NM is angry (“how dare he keep struggling?”), so he is starting to play carelessly. On the contrary, the more experienced old player is playing calmly and taking advantage of his partner’s mistakes. The game ends in a win for Black. The NM storms out of the room muttering “what a lucky patzer, he can’t even calculate three moves ahead!”


Example 2
The young man learnt his lesson well. Next time he was facing a positional player with Black. Being under pressure all game long, he kept waiting for a chance to spice up the game. Suddenly, instead of trying to hold a “draw-or-lose” endgame, he sacrificed a pawn to gain the initiative. Objectively speaking, White had excellent winning chances. However, it was hard for him to switch gears and play aggressively. In a few moves White found himself in time trouble, blundered a smart tactical shot from his opponent, and resigned.
You can recall many such stories yourself if you have played in chess tournaments.

http://www.pogonina.com/images/stories/gunina.jpg

Yound and funny: Natalia Pogonina and Valentina Gunina

at Russian Superfinal'05

Now back to the Russian Superfinal’09. In round 7 I was facing WFM (yes, some people don’t like applying for titles!) Valentina Gunina rated 2448 FIDE. I am friends with this gifted young tactical player, but that doesn’t keep us from fighting like ultimate enemies when it comes to chess. Smile In our game Valya had a big advantage after the opening, but then lost most of it when I suddenly changed the course of the game by offering a pawn sacrifice:

 

33.jpg

Valentina Gunina: 4 years later at Superfinal'09

3.jpg

Natalia Pogonina at Superfinal'09

Reviewing your own and your opponents’ games will help you determine what your and their styles are, and act correspondingly. Never miss a chance to change the course of the game in your favor, always try to “drag the blanket to your side,” and you will see a substantial increase in your playing strength!

» posted in Chess Players
« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Comments:

by danitz - 20 months ago
Baguio City Philippines
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 40

Nice article from you, I always categorized chess players to two strategic and tactical. nice to know the third kind.

by Exal - 23 months ago
Chile
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 591
[COMMENT DELETED]
by Exal - 23 months ago
Chile
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 591

Lol, amitprabhale, the first paragraph says why!!!

by Hammy21 - 23 months ago
Heaven United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 138

who was white?

by StrategyFiend - 23 months ago
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 143

@SirChrislov 

I believe "The ball's in your court" is intended to mean that "I have done my part, now I await your reply."

@WGM Natalia_Pogonina

Nice follow up article!

by WGM Natalia_Pogonina - 23 months ago
Saratov Russia
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 2236

ArtaxToothbrush Female chess players can't conceal their age - it's available at the FIDE website. I'm almost 25 Smile

by amitprabhale - 23 months ago
Mumbai India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 1016

Thanks aleblanca

by msoewulff - 23 months ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 1304

how young???  I think you are mistaken artax

by SirChrislov - 23 months ago
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 15

I like the part about "drag the blanket to your side" to describe changing the game's course in one's favor.   Where I'm from it's "cargar mas canicas en el morral" (to have more marbles in the bag) . In the U.S. it's something like "the ball's in my court." (he has the advantage).

by tboy123 - 23 months ago
India
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 5

So, in essence, you say that the best player is one who adapts their playing style to what the situation demands. This is interesting because I tend to start games with a predetermined mindset rather than keeping it fluid. Thanks for the advice.

by MaddFunn - 23 months ago
Novosibirsk Russia
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 175

You missedone style, it is called "random piece choice influenced by a vague knowledge of chess" :D

by generaldredds - 23 months ago
Bradford England
Member Since: Feb 2010
Member Points: 26

The fourth style is definately strategical style which is close to but different to calculator. An example of such a player would definately be anand, who always knows the strenghts and weaknesses of a position ,what opponent's best plan is and how they are going to try and achieve this and how to stop them whilst at the same time carrying out ur own. You will often see strategic players using the whole board and not just one sector.

Strategic style is the reason humans can sometimes outplay computers in certain endgames as the best humans can work out the best plan without the need for brute force calculation.

by SirChrislov - 23 months ago
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 15

Kasparov:

GM's can be divided into two groups: Maximalists- Those who strive always to find the best move in any position. and Minimalists- Those who combine their time and effort to achieve the best possible tournament result. (he was talking about himself and Karpov.)

by bluey12345 - 23 months ago
Russia
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 102

I'm a tactical player

by WaterAlch - 23 months ago
Washington United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 516

If it's Rock Paper Scissors, or in this case, Positional, Tactical, Calculatory, what's the cycle/order of who beats whom? :)

by ericycsong - 23 months ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

wow

by apposal - 23 months ago
Endicott United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 64

Very informative I learned a lot about my own errors that I make in my own games. Now I can prevent my mistakes and prevent my own mistakes when I am playing. Thank you for your coaching and knowlegde of the game.

by prensdepens - 23 months ago
Batangas Philippines
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 299

If I would be playing chess against Natalia, I dont care if I lost my queen or king, I'll just busy myself analyzing her beautiful face!

Thanks for thie nice article Natalia

by falcon330 - 23 months ago
Boston United States
Member Since: Jul 2009
Member Points: 34

good article

by muthuanju - 23 months ago
KOVILPATTI.. TUTICORIN(D.T), TAMILNADU.. India
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 915

excellent ...

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.