Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Alekhine-Chatard Attack

  • MikeRoesell
  • | May 19, 2010
  • | 5857 views
  • | 19 comments

   The French Defense is one of the most widely used responses in black’s chess arsenal against 1.e4.  It is a known for being a robust and resilient defense that can lead either to boring, maneuvering play or to raging attack and sacrifices.  As with any popular openings there is a myriad of variations that all have their pluses and minuses.  To name a few are the Classical, Winawer, Tarrasch, Advance and Exchange Variations.  I enjoy playing against the French Defense especially in the Winawer Variation where I employ the move Qg4 which was a favorite of the late World Champion, Robert Fischer. I will not be looking at this variation today but I would strongly suggest anyone that is interested to look at the game Fischer-R. Finegold 1963.

       As I have said I won’t be looking at the Winawer today but rather at the Classical French which begins after the moves 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6.  White from here has several plans that can come to fruition later or leave the first player's game devoid of life.  Lately I have been making use of the move 4.Bg5 pinning the knight to the Queen, which is what I believe to be the most aggressive.  Here if black decides to break the pin on the knight and plays 4...Be7 we enter the line that I wish to cover today. I respond to this by playing 5.e5 kicking the knight and after 5…Ne7 I play 6.h4 and the position looks something like this. 

    It seems that white is sacing a pawn here and indeed he is, but what does white get for that pawn?  The answer is an aggressive, tactics filled attack.  This opening choice that I have described is called the Alekhine-Chatard attack. This opening centers very much on the half open h file as well as the first player's control of the dark squares. How does the game continue? 6…Bxg5 7.hxg5 Qxg5 and black is a pawn up here, but now white gets an attack of his own, either striking at the exposed queen or at the vulnerable h6 square. I’m guessing that you see the variation 8.Nh3 Qe7 9.Qg4 g6 10.Nf4.  Remember the old adage “a knight on the rim is grim”, so you want to get the knight off that h3 square.  Now can you see the strike at the h6 square?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Up until here you have seen the setup for the opening. The pieces are set and the game begins in full swing.  I have chosen two full game games in this variation as well as half an older game and will include some of my own analysis of the moves played as well as giving some fun variations. The first game that I am going to take a look at is Kasparov-Korchnoi 2003

The second game is Grischuk-Brynell 2002

   This final game is the fun stuff.  For all of you that like raging attacks with multiple piece sacrifices this game is for you. This is a real beauty by Bogoljubow from back in 1919! I know its old but things like this only get sweeter with time. 

As you can see from these games there are plenty of tactics and fun to be had in this variation.  One of the best things about this enjoyable opening is the record of the opening which is here from the Chess.com database.  This opening sports nothing less than an impressive 44.23% chance of a win for White! If you are an attacking player I believe that you will enjoy this opening as either a surprise weapon or as a main line of defense against the classical French.  Thanks for the read and I hope that you enjoy the Alekhine-Chatard Attack!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments


  • 2 years ago

    gambitgareth

    Excellent commentary, very helpful, Bogo is a legend (though cant believe he lost against alekhines old indian defence - his style is made for it) ... Also in the Alexander Grischuk match - why not 26.Rh7) pinning the queen?

  • 2 years ago

    PavleKosic

    Tnx Mike, but it still seems to me that black got to much counter play on the queenside especially after opening of the c file...thats why I dont like it...Well its a metter of taste, any way thanks for those lines...

  • 2 years ago

    MikeRoesell

    Hey PavleKosic.  The lines that I found are from GM Nick DeFirman's book Modern Chess Openings 15th edition.  These are some of the ideas that he had for declined gambit lines. 

  • 2 years ago

    PavleKosic

    I think that electriceel was thinking on other line. What if black dont accept the gambit and play h6 ?

    I played chatard-alekhine attack myself, and when black accept the gambit, I ussually destroy him, but I have founded that it is dificult to play when he declines the gambit.

  • 2 years ago

    MikeRoesell

    Thank you for clearing that up.  I have the first game in my database where Bogo screwed up but not the rematch.  I memorized that game when I first learned the variation about 4-5 months ago but didn't know who the other player was so that was why I put unknown.

  • 2 years ago

    IM Nezhmet

    Grischuk's game was in New In Chess 2003 (4) annotated by Grischuk.  As was pointed out there by the NIC editors, Bogolyubov actually muffed the attack vs Rudolf Spielmann (not Unknown!!) in Stockholm 1919 in a game posted above and lost.  The game listed above is a challenge rematch, because Spielmann did not believe that white had anything!  The second game obviously Bogolyubov figured it out!

  • 2 years ago

    leonelcm

    A very important article because of this openning analysis. French is always difficult to me play against, thanx for sharing this variation, now I'm sure next time I play against it, it'll be full of fun. 

  • 2 years ago

    MANNY123

    thank you,like this type of game....

  • 2 years ago

    MikeRoesell

    @ElectricEel

    If you have questions ask!
    @BearerOfBadNews there is no hard and fast line that I have in my bag of tricks to give you as i mainly stick to highly theoretical lines in the poisoned pawn or mainline variations.  I would suggest looking into lines that haven't been played in a while and see if you can master the ideas behind those lines becuase they will be harder to combat unless your opponent knows the theory as well.
  • 2 years ago

    ElectricEel

    What is the main White line against 8...h6?

  • 2 years ago

    BearerOfBadNews

    But, what if black chooses the Winawer? White needs to be prepared for that! I don't have the inclination of learning all that theory that comes with it. Is there a line in the Winawer that white can use without having to learn all that theory? 

  • 2 years ago

    ism858

    thank you for the nice article

  • 2 years ago

    MikeRoesell

    Thanks guys it's amazing what Fritz can do for your analysis and the comments that you get. Smile 

  • 2 years ago

    bagheri69

    excellent

  • 2 years ago

    Zal667

    great article, I thought it's one of the GM weekly columns in the beginning/ gppd job keep on rolling  

  • 2 years ago

    iguna

    Nice Article!!

     

    I love to implemented for my next game

  • 2 years ago

    sryiwannadraw

    2010

  • 2 years ago

    ramanjudge

    I always play this opening. Gives wonderful results!!

  • 2 years ago

    WaterAlch

    Very lovely strategy and well implemented. I thought about trying something like it lately on one of my cc games, though too late now. That's ok, I might try it in the future. It kind of resembles a bit of the Scandinavean if chosen to play 1.e4 d5 2. e5 e6 3. d4

Back to Top

Post your reply: