The Janowski Bishops

Submitted by GM Julio_Becerra on Wed, 09/30/2009 at 8:26am.

Dawid Janowski (25 May 1868–15 January 1927) was born in Wolkowysk, Poland, but soon relocated to France. His chess career began in the “Café de la Regence” in Paris, becoming one of the most brilliant players of his epoch!

He started his professional chess career in 1894 and in the late 1890s he received a steady stream of invitations to international events. He won tournaments in Monte Carlo 1901, Hanover 1902 and tied for first at Vienna 1902 and Barmen 1905, so he was established among the world's top half dozen players.

Janowski played three matches against Emanuel Lasker: two friendly matches in 1909 (+2 -2 and +1 =2 -7) and one match for the world chess championship in 1910 (=3 -8). The longer 1909 match has sometimes been called a world championship match but research by Edward Winter indicates that the title was not at stake.

Janowski played very quickly and was known as a sharp tactician who was devastating with the bishop pair! Capablanca annotated some Janowski games with great admiration, and said, "When in form is one of the most feared opponents who can exist." Capablanca noted that Janowski's greatest weakness as a player was in the endgame, and Janowski reportedly told him, "I detest the endgame!" It is said that he was very reluctant to give a draw!

Today I want to share with you two positions where the Janowski Bishops were simply killers!

 

» posted in Chess Players
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by yarborg - 28 days ago
B.C Canada
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 29

Bishop power can be devestating,in the hands of one who relishes,quick strikes.

by chessbibliophile - 2 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 854

Dear Davidjordan and chessmaster102,

If you try the NiC Base, you will find the first game.For the second game, visit the site on Marienbad 1925. Hope this helps.

Links:

http://www.newinchess.com/NICBase/Default.aspx?PageID=400

http://www.pgnmentor.com/events/Marienbad1925/

by Davidjordan - 2 months ago
michagen United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 31

I'm with chessmaster102 on this.

by chessmaster102 - 2 months ago
Detroit MI United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

I can't seem to find either game's on chessgames.com can you provide a link to it.

by irish-yuk - 2 months ago
Cork Ireland
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 27

Very nice, thanks for the article!

by chessbibliophile - 2 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 854

Dear friend,

You have to follow the Move List.

If the queen is taken, it's checkmate with Rg3.

by pmrichard_93 - 2 months ago
CT United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 55

 why did  black didnt take the white queen with the pawn in the second game

by chessbibliophile - 2 months ago
Bangalore India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 854

On Janowsky refusing to play in a private room:

In those days there was no FIDE. It was a player's prerogative to accept or not to accept conditions for playing a match.Not every great player would like the idea of playing in a private room.It would be insuting to him as  as an artist and as a public performer. And what about the right of the public to see the match? The tragedy of that era was that players had to depend on rich patrons. Janowsky was a proud man.But his addiction to gambling and unstable results over the board  were such that they kept him at the mercy of both patrons and creditors.

by ichart - 2 months ago
India
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 66

Neat games...

by bugoobiga - 2 months ago
garden grove United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 297
[COMMENT DELETED]
by kiki-22 - 2 months ago
pasig Philippines
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 155

awesome combinition great game.

by Estragon - 2 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 183

An interesting bit of Janowski trivia.  When he visited the USA in 1899, he hoped to arrange a match with Pillsbury, America's top player and one of the world's elite.  In those days as now, it was difficult to attract sponsors for non-championship chess matches.  One of the ways it was done was to solicit subscribers for a subsequent match book with comments by the players, and to hold the match games in a private room with only the patrons in audience.  Games were not published immediately, although they would invariably "leak" out over a period of time.

Pillsbury insisted on these terms as the only way to raise a sufficient purse, but Janowski declined because he could not bear the thought of his brilliance being confined behind closed doors.  He adored the crowds of fans and curiosity seekers at public events and enjoyed the notoriety of his games being published in the newspapers.

So Janowski gave up the main goal of his trans-Atlantic ocean voyage for his vanity's sake!

by Webhead - 2 months ago
Mississippi United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 249

Heh.  The advantage of "the two Jans" can be impressive.

by ManWithNoName - 2 months ago
United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 3

TommyJ: "

i fail to see why black didnt take the white queen with the pawn in the second game"

Rf3 is checkmate.

by chris1011 - 2 months ago
new york United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 47
[COMMENT DELETED]
by SJM1 - 2 months ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 27

tommyj -

20 Qh6 gxh6

21 Rg3#

by tommyj - 2 months ago
texas United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 4

i fail to see why black didnt take the white queen with the pawn in the second game

by JayFreezy - 2 months ago
United States
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 2

Very interesting !!

by Sapp - 2 months ago
Limburg Netherlands
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 33

Sweet! Awesome games!

by sryiwannadraw - 2 months ago
Austin, Texas United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 174

nieee

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.