Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Old Master Art

Submitted by GM Julio_Becerra on Wed, 10/07/2009 at 12:17am.

While I was writing my last article about the “Janowski Bishops,” I found an exciting game between Janowski and Chajes, New York, Rice Tournament, 1916. The combination conceived by Janowski, besides being too deep, has an interesting history. Fifteen years later in the Chess Olympiad held at Prague in 1931, the game Mikenas-Kashdan reached the same position in the middle game!, with the only difference that Mikenas played for a draw! I believe that at some point the young Mikenas (age 21!) lost the way in his calculation and couldn’t find the key sequence. Things happen, however the 48 year-old Janowsky could figure out this outstanding gem.

After going through and doing some research, the most impressive fact from my point of view is that after these two source games, this same position after black's fifteenth move has been reached several times more. And nobody else has found Janowski’s continuation. The chess vision of those old gladiators was really awesome and mysterious.

Let’s see the game and let’s enjoy the old Master Art!

 





» posted in Amazing Games
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by JMB2010 - 39 days ago
one of the 50 United States
Member Since: Jan 2011
Member Points: 422

great game, especially considering that Janowsky's opponent defeated Capablanca later in the tournament, his last defeat for the next 8 years!

by jaycsa - 17 months ago
Pokhara Nepal
Member Since: Jun 2010
Member Points: 442

nice

by ElDude56 - 2 years ago
Malta Malta
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 103

I was given that position to solve on Chess Tactics Trainer - position 0026207! Of course in the given postition it was  easy to solve but that Nd7 was  a humdinger!

by nithubangalore - 2 years ago
bangalore India
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 12

simply mind  blowing..........th u soo much...........this is real chess

by Manchurian - 2 years ago
Germany
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 34

Genius! Simply a great tactical game. Thank you for sharing this one:-)

by bigfundu - 2 years ago
Chennai India
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 454

An amazing sac and a neat mate!

by forrie - 2 years ago
Vanderbijlpark South Africa
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 805

"I think for black 21.Rxd7 better is Re7."

then it is mate in two: Nxf6 ...Kh6 Qh5 mate

by shareefh - 2 years ago
Amman Jordan
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 227

I think for black 21.Rxd7 better is Re7.

by forrie - 2 years ago
Vanderbijlpark South Africa
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 805

Dont know but did they play with a clock in those days? how long did J had time to think?

Nowadays the clock plays an important role and even GM may miss such a long continuation.

about whether J calculated it all through: I am reading Tals autobiography and he says that he often sacrificed based on intuition. He was seldom wrong.

but this combination is amazing no matter how he found it!

why stuff like this is not often found in GM games today is because GM now defend positionally better. balck should have played his rook to d8 and not to e8 I think.

by NM OmarCayenne - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 12607

I don't think too many of those players you listed were in a class above Janowski.  He was one of the world's best in his prime.

And yes, though 22 Ne4 is quite a move, I would guess that DJ foresaw it when he made the bishop sac.  As you say, such attacks were his forte.

by Archaic71 - 2 years ago
Texas United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 853

jpatrick said:

"I doubt that Janowski "saw" 22.Ne4 when he played 17.Bxh7+, though he may have.   Very often the game is decided by a continuation foreseen by neither player."

I suspect he did, all but one of those moves was forced.  For all of his weaknesses, this game is the kind of tactical battle he shined in.

Janowski was a class below the players that would have been his peers (Lasker, Rubinstein, Capablanca, Maróczy, Tarrasch, Marshall, Tartakower, Réti, Nimzowitsch, Alekhine, Pillsbury, etc.) but he was a top 20 player for nearly 20 years.  Everybody recalls that Lasker and Capablanca dominated him, but he scored respectably against most of the top masters of his time.

by lostgalaxy - 2 years ago
Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 342

It was really an art piece. So rare in the top level games nowadays.

by haas321 - 2 years ago
Bronx United States
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 165

Thx for the game!!!

by SPINUS - 2 years ago
ESPINHO Portugal
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 21

Thanks, ShermanLee

by king_43 - 2 years ago
Nicosia Cyprus
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 105

Great game!

by FM VPA - 2 years ago
Valsad-Gujarat India
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 1369

A very combinative attack that culminates into an Arabian mate.Wink

by thunderwood - 2 years ago
taipei Taiwan
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 27

to ShermanLee

I think if

22.  ...    Bxe4

23. Qxf6  Rg8

24. Rcc7 +-

with no other black piece can defend g7

by Jpatrick - 2 years ago
Pennsylvania United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1232

I doubt that Janowski "saw" 22.Ne4 when he played 17.Bxh7+, though he may have.   Very often the game is decided by a continuation foreseen by neither player.

Moves like 17.Bxh7+ are played using judgment supported by calculation, and tempered with experience.  Sometimes you have to enter a line knowing that the continuation is there, and trusting that you can find it.

by spkfsa - 2 years ago
Voorhees United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 21

Good game but not sure why Mikenas (white) should have spent any time looking at 21...Bc6, which I think is far inferior to at least three other black moves including 21...Rf8

by Fuda - 2 years ago
Copenhagen Denmark
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 3

to percivalfox

 

I think the point in 22 Ne4 is that black if black goes for the night, white can go 23 Qf6 because the pawn is pinned and with the bishop gone the g7 pawn would be unprotected. Also if black goes for the rook 22 ... Bd7 it is followed by 23 Nxf6 forking king, bishop, and rook. Im also a noob but its my best bid.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.