The story of two rooks and one knight, -told in five pictures!

Submitted by mauerblume on Fri, 10/03/2008 at 3:23am.

Rooks need open and half-open files. This is a well known "truth"!

***

Here is a

5-step-program

1. occupy a open line with one rook and control it

2. double rooks in that line

3. get with one rook at second or seventh rank

4. Get them both on the second or seventh row

5. Let them work with the help of other pieces

***

Let`s look at the  the knight! Where is the ideal position for it? Yes, it is in the center without the possibility to be chased away!As an outpost!

***

In one of my OTB chess games I got such an ideal knight position and rooks working in an ideal way. I will show this game in five pictures ( diagrams), because pictures can often tell us more than moves Smile

( The whole game is uncommented at the end .-I will post it commented next days in my blog)

1. picture: After the opening black has adventage in piece development

 
















Here we can see clearly black`s adventage in piece development. All my pieces are developed and active. Rooks are on a open and a half-open file and the knight is fixed in center.-

White has problems with piece development. Ra1 and Bc1 cannot move and Nd5 will removed from his position by Rc4

***

2. picture : rooks are coming along the line

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


3. picture : rooks change to the second row

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Picture: Knight and pawns helping the rooks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. picture: the endposition:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


So you have seen the 5-step-program and the knight at work. Here the whole game!

 

» posted in Scholastics
 

Comments:

by mauerblume - 2 months ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5480

After 19. exf5 comes 20 Rxd5 and some release from pressure

by chessmaster102 - 2 months ago
Detroit MI United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 499

What was wrong with black playing 19...exf5.

by RockyMountainLion - 9 months ago
Westminster, Colorado United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 207

Thank you for the post Heinrich, there is much for me to gain from some of the simple things you have brought up here!  Smile

by thewolf72 - 12 months ago
Rome Italy
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 114

Thank you ! It's very interesting !

by mauerblume - 13 months ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5480

Yes, that would have been a better strategy for white: Giving one ot two pawns to get out of passivity!- But also then black adventage would have been clear

by bunkerputt - 13 months ago
Austin United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 77

Highly instructive.  Instead of white playing to protect his pawns with Rb1, he should have given some material in order to gain some activity.

by trippel - 13 months ago
Cherry Willingham United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 19

I have a lot to learn!  Thanks for the lesson

by 21stcenturyschizoid - 13 months ago
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 86

instead of taking the pawn on d5 white should have played 10.Nc3 which does not allow black to get such a powerfully posted Knight.

by figrock - 13 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

Thanx for the education..!

by santiR - 13 months ago
outside Washington D.C. United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 1020

nice.

by bigfish - 13 months ago
E,M,T,Ontario Canada
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 1606

Good diagrams

by mauerblume - 13 months ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5480

Yes, the bishop had no way out and before captured by the knight, he was sacrified at f4!- But the whole game will be posted in my blog in the next days

by Dilling3r - 13 months ago
Nebraska United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 20

black used bishop to kill white knight. rook came out and took the bishop then went back to defend.

by Beelzebub666 - 13 months ago
Great Britain
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 378

Perhaps he resigned over the ordination of women.

by DXBrea - 13 months ago
Alberta Canada
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 105

I don't get it.... what happened to black's bishop??

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.