^ Click here to remove ads! ^

The Terrible Traxler Part 5

Submitted by cldng on Tue, 01/29/2008 at 7:38am.

The Terrible Traxler Part 5

 by NM Steve Colding.

   7. Ke2 part 1

      Today we are discussing 7. Ke2 a risky attempt to try to bring the King's Rook into the game. The problem with this, as in a great many variations in the Traxler, is the terribly dangerous h5-d5 diagonal which Black's Bishop on c8 has access to after d5. It is good for us that the idea 8.Rf1 is very easily busted.

      In Vuckovic's Art of Attack he spends a chapter discussing that a King that lost the right to castle is worth a piece if and only if the King stays in the center. Here White's King will be in the center and in such and open position it will be most uncomfortable.

     After the moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Ng5 Bc5 5.Nf7 Bxf2+ 6.Kxf2 Nxe4+ 7.Ke2

Previous articles:

The Terrible Traxler Part 1

The Terrible Traxler Part 2

The Terrible Traxler Part 3

The Terrible Traxler Part 4

Next article: Ke2 Part 2, moves other than 8.Rf1

 

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by NM cldng - 5 months ago
Brooklyn, New York United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 229

To fivepastmidnight,

Patience, patience all will be nswered in time but thanks for the comment.

Steve

by fivepastmidnight - 5 months ago
sincity Trinidad/Tobago
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 23
what if after black captures the f2 pawn with his bishop to start the traxler, white doesnt take the bishop, but moves to say f1 instead?
by NM cldng - 5 months ago
Brooklyn, New York United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 229

 To justjimprime

Well yes at first but in order to learn we must first explore bad moves. Then and only then can we start to explore the critical positions. First you have to know the argument and then you can try to find innovation. We seek understanding and that is what the basis of this series is about.

Steve

by justjimprime - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1
Isn't the real message here that this is a really bad opening for white to pursue? We call this one the "Frank and Ernest" because those two pieces trying to do anything by themselves is so inept. It's premature execution. Of course, black can blunder into a white win, but has to work at it to lose.
by NM cldng - 5 months ago
Brooklyn, New York United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 229

To Fotoman. It is truly my pleasure. Steve

by Fotoman - 5 months ago
Philippines
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 583

Another example of a good idea for white gone bad.

Neat series, thanks.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.