Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

To Err is Human, Part 2

  • GM Gserper
  • | Feb 26, 2012
  • | 7796 views
  • | 20 comments

In the first part of this article we saw examples where chess players didn't learn from their mistakes and therefore they were falling for the same traps again and again.  Here is one of the most amazing stories. It started in 1971 in the traditional tournament in Hastings. Famous GM Victor Korchnoi was playing his main competitor in this tournament, the rising star of Soviet chess, GM Anatoly Karpov. Here is what he says about the opening of this game (I tried to translate his words from Russian as close to the original as possible): "When I made a difficult decision to play this opening line against Karpov, I couldn't imagine how good was my choice... For decades Karpov had failures in this opening line..."

Here is the game:

 

Three years later the same opponents played the Candidates Final for the World Crown. As it turned out later, it was the match that determined the World Champion since Fischer refused to defend his title.  You would think that the first thing Karpov did during the preparation for the match was finding the way to neutralize the opening his opponent already used to beat him.  Then look at game 19 of their match:
There is no point to analyze this incredibly complicated game.  What really matters for our topic is that Karpov again suffered in the opening.  Of course you can notice that even though the opening set-up was very close to what the opponents played in the previous game, still strictly speaking it was not exactly the same opening. Fair enough.  But then look at the game played in the  Candidates Semi- Final 15 years later:
Reportedly, when Korchnoi saw how his old rival lost this game, he chuckled: "In almost twenty years Karpov didn't manage to learn this opening".
What amazes me the most is not even the fact that Karpov indeed wasn't well prepared for the same opening after two decades of having problems there.  How could he forget about the next classical game of Petrosian which fits the common cliche "Every Russian schoolboy knows it".
 
So if the legendary Karpov had the same problem over and over again, what should we, mere mortals, do to prevent such situations? A very simple advice that you can find in most of the books or which would be given by any coach is you need to analyze your lost games in order to avoid making the same mistakes again.  I bet you heard this advice dozens of times and believe me, Karpov knew it as well.  But if we talk about opening problems, I want to mention the advice given me by Kasparov when I had the privilege of attending the legendary Botvinnik-Kasparov school. I never heard it before and there is a chance that you never heard it either.
Kasparov said: "Your tournament results are the ultimate judge of the opening. Sometimes you really like an opening, you obtain good positions there, but your results are awful.  Drop the opening! But sometimes you hate the opening and yet somehow you have good results there.  Keep playing the opening as long as it gives you good results." As an example Kasparov talked about the Tarrasch defense in the Queen's Gambit declined. He said he never really liked this opening, but somehow it gave him good results until Karpov just thrashed him in a number of games in their World Championship match after which Kasparov stopped playing the Tarrasch Defense for good.  Kasparov's advice makes perfect sense in my opinion.  If your tournament results are not very good in some particular opening, then probably the positions you get out of the opening just don't fit your style even if objectively they are good for you. As Kasparov's example with the Tarrasch Defense shows, the reverse is also true.  So, if only Karpov followed this very logical advice and avoided the variation that gave him so much headache...
to be continued...

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    rare

    Thank you so much!!!.I learned a lot!!.God bless to the authors!!!

  • 3 years ago

    hasit

    thank u rahul

  • 3 years ago

    rahulkadge

    bcoz f6+

  • 3 years ago

    hasit

    hey thnx for such a good article but plz solve my query- why did black resign after 41Rxe7 in the last game... i see no reason 4 dat.. infact black is up by 41...Rxe7

  • 3 years ago

    corpsporc

    Interesting to see that happen to Karpov.

    @mocd08: Extermination is a fine discipline!

  • 3 years ago

    diogens

    Interesting article, like always GM Serper.

  • 3 years ago

    mocd08

    @Y2K14:

    So if my dream is to be a serial killer, you're down with that?

  • 3 years ago

    Y2K14

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago

    Swaglantern

    The lord saved me from my gaynesss.....i hpe it saves the rest of you also

  • 3 years ago

    g-levenfish

    Yup" leibo" I got the same problem you got!

  • 3 years ago

    Huyen_Linh

    Great article as usual!

  • 3 years ago

    ONU_Gollun

    I really like your articles, Serper, they are great.

  • 3 years ago

    Anubhav_2000

    gr8,just incredible!!!

  • 3 years ago

    bagpiper123456

    yeah this happened with fischer alot when he played white against the winawer. even as the superior player, he had a +16-12=10 record, which is not very strong especially considering he always played the moves which invited the variation

  • 3 years ago

    leibo

    IMHO, the significance of openings in achieving victory is highly overrated. You can know an opening inside-out but once your opponent tries a new variation on you and you find yourself in a new position - your knowledge of the opening is really insignificant at this stage and it's not going to help you. Rather, knowing how to properly analyze new positions is what's required, and sharpening those skills is what's needed. I face this quandry often: I study an opening, I prepare for different lines, I feel confident - but next thing I know someone makes a new unfamiliar move - and I'm lost! Sound familiar to anyone? 

  • 3 years ago

    eimad

    i like this phrase 'So if the legendary Karpov had the same problem over and over again, what should we, mere mortals"

  • 3 years ago

    GMKiiuglik

    thanks for sharing the advice!

  • 3 years ago

    Jollybee

    Perhaps the power of "forgetfulness" is the reason of recurring mistakes...Undecided

  • 3 years ago

    grandestmonster

    Timely advice..nice to have examples of stubborness from the best..don't feel like such a patzer now..I've often stuck with openings that don't really further my game as they're my 'style',whilst relegating openings I don't feel at ease with but that curiously give me better results to the 'occasional' file.....no more..if I can't take advice from Kasparov I should take up snap...

Back to Top

Post your reply: