Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Try your Hand at Planning

Submitted by WIM energia on Thu, 12/24/2009 at 9:53pm.

                Today will mark the start of a series of new articles that will span the next couple of months. The topic of the articles will be "Planning in Chess." One has to differentiate between the ideas of strategical play in general and a specific plan. Strategical play has to do with improving a given position with strategical methods, usually without tactics. This play is characterized by the following methods:

a)      Regrouping pieces with the goal to improve activity;

b)      Improving pawn structure;

c)      Exchanges (this  we covered extensively over the last year);

What is a plan in a chess game? Sometimes, we cannot do a, b and c at the same time. Thus, we choose one component and follow it, for example improving the position of the knight by transferring it to the centre.  The specific choice to move the knight over other strategical options is the plan. When we get a position without tactical play, a peaceful one, our goal would be to maximally improve the position of the pieces. Then, figure out which pawn structure will benefit us and look at which pieces are good to exchange. Of course, there are many methods of how to approach a given position. In my previous articles I described the method given by Dorfman. One can be guided by many signs, for example: seeing a weak square in opponent’s position and injecting one's own piece there. I would like for you to concentrate on the 3 elements presented above. Of course, sometimes the position requires a tactical solution to get an advantage or to defend successfully. Then, the positional methods will be too slow. With time one develops an intuition in which positions to look for what type of solution.

                Every week I will present two positions to solve. The goal will be to find a plan for one side. I am looking for roughly 3-move plans. One has to evaluate the given position and find a plan according to a, b or c presented above. You have to identify candidate-moves and choose the one you think is the strongest.  Sometimes, the positions will be of a tactical character… because during the game you never know what to look for. You will have a week to discuss the position here in the comments section and in my next article I will provide the thinking process, as well as the solution to the exercise.  I will also give two new positions to solve. I think planning is a very important component of chess strategy that one has to work at. I have trouble with planning too while playing, thus these exercises will be beneficial to me as well. The positions are not easy, but they are also beneficial because you will learn typical ideas in middlegames, as well as endgames. So, the two positions are:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

» posted in Strategy
« Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next »

Comments:

by cal7102 - 7 months ago
Under my Bed Australia
Member Since: Apr 2011
Member Points: 10

Position 2 you need to put all of your pawns on dark squares

by dacar - 2 years ago
Medellín & Cartagena Colombia
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 62

Position One:

White plays b4.  White Bishop on c1 can take control of a1-h8 diagonal.  Bishop located at b2 square after b4 supported by a3 or accompanied by a4 can do this.  Consider this move to centralize the Bishop´s power and it would be a weapon against black King`s pawns and g7 specially.  White pawns structure as a3 (or a4) b4 c4 d5 can be used to atack black Queen side too.

Position Two:

Withe plays d5.  This Pawn atacks e6.  It can change King side Pawns structure if black doesn´t change.  If black King takes after change of pawns then white moves Bh3 to capture Bc8.  If black pawn advances to e5 then white moves e4 followed by Bh3 will be disgusting for black due the pression over c8 forcing the King residence at 8 file.

Great article!  Thanks for sharing and Best Regards!

by ericycsong - 2 years ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

what are the answers?

by bbg2 - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 16

Problem 1: Re1 simple development.... open file.... enuf said. Black is going to have to go into contortions to finish development. So if there are going to be trades let him take the time to do em, while you finish developing naturally.

Problem 2 :...hmm black has the outside passed pawn but backwards development. Any advantage white has is temporary. So something must be done now. So d5 w/ the idea of luring the king away from the Q side and winning one of black's queen side pawn before its to late. However an immediate d5 just runs into e5 so we have to prepare it... w/ g4 then if he doesnt play g6 we can push the d pawn and if he does then white can play e4 and transfer the Bishop to the f1-a6 diagonal and play a4 which should hinder black while getting counterplay in the center.

P.S. This may be a bit of a tangent but I believe the fact that the a1 square is black could end up being important later on.

by Archaic71 - 2 years ago
Texas United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 853

Position #1 - Move the Bg5 (making our worst piece better, piling pieces on the kingside)

Position #2 - we have reached an end game, time to centralize the king, Kd3

by chesteroz - 2 years ago
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 189

Pos 1: White's diagonals are important because of space obtained so is e-file. so exchanges on e4 need to happen quickly. Nf4-Re1-Bd3 or Nf4-Re1-h3-Bf3 is where I would focus at this stage

But what can black do while this going on?

I am not sure white g4 is right because of black B and Q along with weakening of white King defence pawn structure.

by B97 - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 100

On the second position, I'd try to create a dark-square pawn fortress with e4-e5 and f4 etc..

Black's light square bishop is locked in and it is probably a good idea to maintain the lock. Also, his rook is locked up. White can gobble up space on the king side.

by mikex22 - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 3967

yeah...people who call positions without immediate tactics "strategy" tend not to realize you're just shifting tactics and tactical oppourtunities and the two are the same thing

by merchco - 2 years ago
Dublin Ireland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 2551

I think you are confused about strategy. All tactical play is strategical, by its very nature, since the purpose of tactics is to achieve the given strategy. Thus re grouping of pieces i would say is a tactic  improving pawn structure is a tactic engaging in exchanging pieces is a tactic unless i am totally confused on what tactics are.

by noodlehead710 - 2 years ago
Atlanta United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 590

For position 2, I'm a little more unsure.  I'm not so great at endgame positional play.  My first thought is to force the issue and push d5.  If black wants to prevent the passed pawn, they have to play exd5 or Kd6.  After exd5 Bxd5, our bishop is in good position and if black attacks it they lose a pawn.  Also, after Kd6 dxe6 either Bxe6 loses a pawn, or fxe6 weakens their k-side pawns further.

by noodlehead710 - 2 years ago
Atlanta United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 590

For position 1, I think it would be nice to control the e-file or more center squares, but I feel like there are a few too many thorns in our side to do that right away.  Our central pawns are really advanced which means all the center-controlling goes on with major and minor pieces.  The white piece that I'm most unhappy with is our light bishop, it seems stuck on e2 just protecting the bishop and preventing our e-file action.   The black piece I'm most unhappy with is the light bishop, which seems pretty unchallengable for now and is doing a great job tying up some of our pieces and controlling the center.  So to trade off their bishop, I might be thinking about an attack by a knight from d4.  To aid this I would like to move Bf3 then Ne2-d4.  Now we will either trade off their bishop, or they are forced to retreat to Bd7, much less threatening.  Then we can comfortably play Re1 and h3.

by B97 - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 100

In the first position, I would try a direct attack on the Black King with g4. My idea is to open up the g-file and setup a Queen Rook battering ram. This may work because white's bishops can enter the action rather quickly. If black does not take g4, supporting g4 with h4/f4 would follow. Maybe one of you experts can take this idea further. :)

by deepOzzzie - 2 years ago
Townsville Australia
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 1375

Position 1.

If i had this position as white i would, i think i would try to exchange my opponents light squared bishop off. To i would need to attack the bishop. But at the same time i want to secure any advantage i have the queenside, with a move like Be3, with plans of a big pawn storm on the kingside with g4. However, i think after g4 i would be a little concerned about my kinds safety.

So in other words my plan is to have dominance on the queenside, then strike at the blacks on good piece. The light squared bishop. :D

Position 2.

The plan here seems faily straight forward whites idea is to nuture his extra pawn on the kingside. I.e. Force a break. Personally i think if white was planning to play something like e4 d5 and busting in the center it would make for an extremely interesting position.

by ankitthemaster - 2 years ago
Bombay India
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 146

Pos1: 1.Nf4 followed by 2.Bd3 Bxd3 3.Nxd3

I want black to loose is attacking option and ready my knight to position on e6 and move my pieces in more attacking manner

by darius - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 1364

On 3 or 4 move e2 B to f3

that is 1 g4...Bc8 (Gee it looks like black is starting the game over).2f4... 3Bf3 and then 4Be3 with Qc2, aRe1 and kingside possibilities Maybe c3 N over to g3. Yes I really like g4.

by cunctatorg - 2 years ago
Athens Greece
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 421

 In Pos. 1 I see that Black's KB is badly developed as his QN also is, partially as a consequence of Black's lack of space: Pd6 is a serious obstacle and White's Pd5 guarantees this situation. Black's KB should try ...Bf8, ...g6, ...Bg7 but the Bf5 then becomes a serious problem, ...Bd7 isn't an option due to White's Pd5.

 So Black has to trade pieces for space... and White could try in the opposite direction; 1. Nf4 (1. Nb5 Bxd3!? 2. Bxd3 ...) Ne4 (1... Nbd7 2. g4 or 2. f3...) 2. Nb5 c6 3. Nd4 is an interesting working hypothesis. Then 3... Bg6 4. f3 Nf6 5. g4 (!?) c5 6. Nb5 or 4. Bf3?! f5 but my tactical analysis is poor, the plan seems to me interesting... So 1. Nf4 Ne4 (1... c6 2. f3) 2. Nb5 c6 3. Nd4 Bg6 4. f3 (4. Bf3 Nd7 and 5... f5 or 4... f5) Nf6 5. g4 (?!) but then "tactics" is in demand...

by darius - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 1364

Elubas

I think in response to 1Qb3 1...b6 is better than Qc8 but maybe not. With Qc8 I would continue aiming for Be3, fRe1 but perhaps on the whole you are right. I was looking now at 1g4 with f4, Be3 to follow, something you guys previously discussed and perhaps this is better in that it drives back the bishop, gains space, frees the e2 bishop from defense, and offers some attacking chances, The c6 "hole" is not guaranteed or necessarily all that useful. My thoughts with the queen were to open up a hole at c6, or drive the bishop back to protect but indeed doesn't g4 accomplish that much more nicely!

by Elubas - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 7816

darius the problem with 1 Qb3 is that black can just play ...Qc8, making no weakneses and the queen doesn't have much of a future.

by darius - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 1364

Position 1

1Qb3 with the idea of weakening Black's Q side pawns and creating a hole on c6 of 1...b6. Then 2Nb4 covering a6,c6,d5 with possible advancement of a pawn. Black taking the knight with bishop leaves us with strong white squared B with good range along king side as well as Q side goals. The b knight of black may aim for c5 but our b pawn can drive it off and our black squared bishop can end up on e3 covering as well.

 

Position 2

Our rook keeps the black king away from b pawn where black's majority is. My goal would be to improve our pawn position. Our rook and bishop both have excellent range. 1g4 would discourage ...f5 and now we threaten 2Be4. If they move 2Kd1 to cover f5 to prepare possible 2...f5 or 2...f6, 2e4 would prevent ...f5 and prepare for 2...f6 3d6 with a passed pawn if they move 3...e5. The only drawback to 2e4 is that it restricts our bishop a bit but our B has more range than theirs and our pawns on white squares further restricts their bishop.

by diagonal - 2 years ago
Greece
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 614

Would attacking be the way to improve your chances of winning with these positional features or prophylaxis with 3-combination plan?

« Previous | 1 2 3 4 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.