Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

You Have It, He Doesn’t! Part 1

  • IM Silman
  • | Apr 1, 2014
  • | 16444 views
  • | 41 comments

Quite a few amateurs become a bit confused when game annotations talk about the enormous importance of the dark squares in one position or another. Yes, everyone knows what the dark squares are, but in most cases, one is left wondering why they are such a big deal.

Of course, this article isn’t just about the “dark squares.” It’s about gaining something your opponent doesn’t have, and then using it with such energy and finesse that you (metaphorically) shove it down their chessic throat! Thus this article could just as easily have been highlighted by light squares (which does appear at the end of the article!), or a knight versus bishop situation, or any number of other examples that might well be covered in future iterations of this “You Have It, He Doesn’t” theme.

The idea of this theme is simple: In chess you need to create something for yourself and then make use of it. Or, if it’s already there, you need to recognize it (if you don’t know it’s there, you won’t be able to milk it). In the present case, the “something” is the dark squares.

I’ll use two recent tournament examples from my trusty student BB, who somehow continuously gives me extremely instructive games. The lessons here are very, very important, so those that actually want to improve their game should spend a lot of time pondering this article. This kind of information will also help you understand master games, and/or help drive you to the coveted expert (2000) level.

Mejia Luis (1483) – BB (1458), [C12]
Arcadia Chess Club 2014

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Bb4 

The game is a very theoretical French Defense, MacCutcheon Variation.

5.e5 h6 

White now has to make a tough decision. The main moves are 6.Bd2 and 6.Be3, but 6.Bh4 g5 7.Bg3 has been tried in recent grandmaster practice, and 6.Bc1 is seen from time to time. The other (obvious) choice, 6.exf6 hxg5 7.fxg7 Rg8 tends to give Black excellent results.


6.Bxf6? gxf6

6.Bxf6 was a poor move that gave Black a “gift.” Most amateurs wouldn’t think much about this so-called gift, but a titled player would instantly have one clear thought: “I have a dark-squared bishop and he doesn’t!”

That one sentence pretty much defines Black’s general strategy: use that dark-squared bishop to dominate the dark squares. No pondering, no calculation, just a clear, obvious path to a happy result. Of course chess is a mix of many things: pattern recognition, willpower, tactical acumen, strategic understanding, etc. You will need to use all these tools if you want to be a successful chess player. 

The problem is that most amateurs (beginners and masters alike) don’t have a solid set of positional skills (let alone the whole “package” mentioned above). Thus, in the present case I'll share a truth that defines this article: 

If you don't recognize a gift when it's given to you (be it positional or tactical), you won't be able to use it.

That sounds obvious, but it’s actually quite profound, especially in the position after 6...gxf6. Why? Because most players would simply develop their forces without really understanding the cool thing they have. And even if they notice that having the dark-squared bishop is important, they would still be unable to maximize its potential. 

If you don't milk a gift's potential, you're missing the boat.

CH_cow_2.jpg
Dark Squares the cow | Image Wikipedia

In this kind of position, tactics aren’t going to lead you down the correct path. Doing the, “I’m going to develop my pieces” mantra also isn’t going to help. This is where strategic patterns come into play – they make many positions crystal clear at a glance.

So what is the correct path? The answer is simple: you need to milk your dark-squared bishop by placing your pieces and pawns on squares that compliment it.

This does not mean develop and then see what there is to see! Most of the time people will happily develop their pieces only to discover that it’s hard to find a clear plan or even a good continuation. That’s because you often develop your pieces to squares that actually hurt that early gift (perhaps a file, square, weak pawn, good minor pieces, etc.), or in many cases ignore it.

7.Nf3

I should mention that White is far from dead, but he will need to highlight the plusses in his position too if he wants to go blow for blow with an opponent that’s going to make maximum use of his stuff.

7...Bd7

Playable, but it lacks the desire (or awareness) to make use of that dark-squared bishop (the dark squares are an extension of that bishop, and 7…Bd7 isn’t addressing that – in fact, it’s actually getting in the way of the knight, which would prefer to move to d7). Here’s a perfect illustration of how a top player handles this kind of position: 

8.a3

Here Black played 8...Bxc3+ (Playable, of course... Black eventually went on to win the game, even though he got into some trouble). But why not create a puzzle here? Let’s say that after 8...Bxc3+ 9.bxc3 Black played 9...Nc6 (in the game Black played 9...c5), is 10.Bb5 (getting rid of the knight so White’s control over e5 remains firm) a good idea?

Puzzle 1:

Since White was kind enough to give Black the dark-squared bishop on move 6, I would keep the gift with 8...Bf8! when ...c5 will follow (cracking White’s center), and a later ...Bg7 is also in the air, chowing down on the tasty a1-h8 diagonal. Black can castle queenside, or he can safely castle kingside too. In any case, I would be very proud of a student who played 8...Bf8. Here’s a sample line:

Puzzle 2:

Oddly, BB ran into a dark-square situation twice in the same event! In both cases he failed to make use of these “gifts” because he didn’t notice them. 

Once again:

If you don't train yourself to notice the many positional gifts you'll be given, you won't be able to play in accordance with the needs of the position.

R. Manahan (1196) – BB (1458) [E94]
Arcadia Chess Club 2014

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 Na6 8.Be3 Ng4 9.h3?

9...Nxe3 10.fxe3

Now that you have this position (and the information in our initial example) firmly stuck in your brain, you will no doubt instantly understand what Black should be thinking: “I have a dark-squared bishop, and he doesn’t! How can I make it work for me?”

10...c6

BB said: “Creating space (c7) so the knight can get back into the game and preparing to play ...c5 in case White plays d5.”

Note how BB’s thoughts had nothing to do with his acquisition of the dark-squared bishop. Instead, he wanted to get his knight back into play (a noble idea, but not when Black has far bigger fish to fry).

Though 10...c6 with the idea of ...Nc7 misses the mark, 10...c6 is still in the ballpark since it envisions ...Qb6, hitting b2 and d4 and working the dark squares. Nevertheless, the obvious (and good) move was 10…Bh6, hitting e3 and instantly turning the dark-squared bishop into a very annoying piece.

Before looking at 10...Bh6, there is a very tempting alternative. See if you can find it in the following puzzle. 

Puzzle 3

Let’s return to the position after 10...Bh6:

White has:

* 11.Qd3 Nb4.

* 11.Qd2 exd4 12.Nxd4 (White’s position is wretched since his doubled isolated pawns rest on an open file, meaning they will be targets for a long time to come) and now 12...c6! (takes the b5 and d5 squares away from White’s c3-knight. The tempting ...Nc5 can be played at any time). 13.Rad1 and now 13...Nc5 is strong (13...Qg5 and 13...Re8 are also perfectly reasonable). 14.b4 Ne6 15.Qd3 Qg5 16.Rf3 Bg7 when White is in real trouble due to possibilities like ...Be5 followed by ...Qh4 and ...Ng5, pummeling White’s weak pawns and weak dark squares along the h2-b8 diagonal.

* 11.Kf2 is best. How would you handle this position?

Puzzle 4:

11.d5

Here Black played the hideous 11...c5? which closes the position (not what you want to do when you have two bishops), takes the c5-square away from the a6-knight, and also misses out on another very important idea (Black won anyway). Instead of 11...c5, what should Black do? 

Puzzle 5:

Let’s stay with our theme but turbo-charge it with an example (actually a long puzzle, but the notes will make that puzzle an instructive example) of how Alekhine made use of the dark squares:

Puzzle 6:

Of course, once you get used to dominating a weak square complex, you can use your newfound knowledge to claim all sorts of individual weak squares and, naturally, the light squares too. I’ll end this article with another Alekhine game (this time targeting the light-squares!): 

Alexandre_Alekhine_Color.jpg
Alexandre Alekhine | Image Wikipedia

Max Bluemich - Alekhine, [B15]
Krakow1941

1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nf6 5.Nxf6+ exf6

An interesting, and quite old, line of the Caro-Kann which I personally used quite often.

6.Bc4 Bd6 7.Qe2+ Be7 8.Nf3 Bg4 9.c3 Nd7 10.0-0 Nb6 11.Bb3 0-0 12.Re1 Bd6 13.Bc2 Bh5 

14.Qd3 Bg6 15.Qd1 Bc7 16.Bxg6 hxg6

One of my all-time favorite pawn structures, which I call “The Box.” To me, it’s a thing of beauty!

17.Nd2 f5 18.Nf1 Qh4 19.Qf3 Rfe8 20.g3 Qh3

White’s still okay, but do take note of the various potential light-squared weaknesses on c4, d5, f3, g2, and h3.

21.Bf4 Bxf4 22.Qxf4 Nd5 23.Qf3 Nf6 24.Re3 Rxe3 25.Nxe3 Re8 26.Rd1 Ne4 27.Rd3 Ng5! 

This knight strikes out at three different advanced light squares: e4, f3, and h3.

28.Qg2 and here we’ll enjoy one final puzzle.

Puzzle 7:

Not done solving puzzles? Tactics Trainer is waiting!


RELATED STUDY MATERIAL

Comments


  • 4 months ago

    mattchess

    Just read this one after the more recent pawn structure article.  Good stuff and just the kind of thing I need right now.  Often find myself confused trying to form a plan when there are no obvious attacking patterns.  Positional play is something I struggle with.

  • 5 months ago

    NM e4Najdorf

    greate article !

  • 5 months ago

    Time4Tea

    This is an awesome and very instructive article Mr. Silman - thank you so much!  I think these are great examples that illustrate the value of the Bishop pair and how to use it.  I assume the same principles apply to the light squares though, as well as the dark squares?  Wink

  • 5 months ago

    andresestica77

    I must thank you MI Silman, i am a chess teacher for kids, somne play national finals others just play for fun with their families and friends, but a friend of mine recomended me your book Reasses ypur Chess last edition, and it helped my self to improove solidly and gave me a whole world of ideas to teach the kids, and it has worked raising their ratings amazingly!! I also then started using this articles, you post here and i have to say they understand much faster then we adults do. Truly thanks and please keep publishing. I am reading all your articles on Alekhine too for my adults class, it will be an interesting topic, and im working on translating it to spanish. BIg hug.

  • 5 months ago

    mirasma

    Dear Mr. Silman,

    First of all, apologies for sounding like a lazy guy. But this is critical for me to follow your articles and thus unashamedly I will place this request anyway.

    I am very new to chess and I have not yet mastered the coordinates well. So, in your text when you casually mention something like Bf6, I start counting from a-h and then 1-8 and get confused and then again start counting the reverse way. I know it takes just a few practice session for me to master the coordinates, but Sir, can you just not use coordinates in the board? It may not help everyone, but that will help someone like me follow the articles effortlessly. 

    Thanks for reading. I am reading your books now to understand and learn chess. Thank you so much my dear teacher. 

    Regards

  • 5 months ago

    IM Silman

    Many people seem confused by this article on dark-squares. Some get angry and say that dark-squares aren’t that important. Others don’t know why I picked dark-squares as a topic. Others feel compelled to count the numbers along the diagonals, whereupon they are convinced that I’m practicing a form of mental domination/slavery by taking them down a mystic path to the netherworld via numerology. [I would never do that, BUT... don’t forget to send me your bank account passwords, don’t forget to send me your bank account passwords, don’t forget to send me your bank account passwords, don’t forget to send me your bank account passwords, don’t forget to send me your bank account passwords...]

    What amazes me is that this was clearly answered in the second paragraph! Here it is again:

    Of course, this article isn’t just about the “dark squares.” It’s about gaining something your opponent doesn’t have, and then using it with such energy and finesse that you (metaphorically) shove it down their chessic throat! Thus this article could just as easily have been highlighted by light squares (which does appear at the end of the article!), or a knight versus bishop situation, or any number of other examples that might well be covered in future iterations of this “You Have It, He Doesn’t” theme.

    What this tells me is that a large amount of chess players on this site think chess is all about making threats, looking for the most basic tactics, and moving about in a “I wouldn’t know what a plan is if it bit me” stupor. There’s no shame in this since EVERYONE starts out that way, but the goal is to get beyond this nonsense. So I’ll continue writing basic positional articles and, if you take the material seriously, you’ll discover that you’ve added a whole new level to your game.

  • 5 months ago

    de_sh_pande

    nice article 

  • 5 months ago

    jhillary

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 5 months ago

    ralphsnider

    Wow

  • 5 months ago

    Tinku_Basumatary

    really tried to focus, want to thank you and yes last week i got your How to reassess your chess 4th edition, i am an amateur and i hope this book will help me to move ahead as it promise

  • 5 months ago

    ishamael13

    Makes perfect sense, but glad there is a part 2. Is there any chance for a second Chess Mentor course in weak color complex? I went through IM Pruess beautiful course but need (many) more positions, with slightly higher rating, hope one day you can create one for us, IM Silman, because it would help a lot.   

  • 5 months ago

    gwynn_fan

    Hi Jeremy

    In puzzle 6, What to you think about 21...Nd3?? Thanks Bob

  • 5 months ago

    IM Silman

    @ chess1981:

    Sorry, I have no idea where that 1600 rating came from. My cat probably jumped on me as I was typing, leading to the typo.

  • 5 months ago

    Chess1981

    So helpful - thank you!  Just curious, though:  your piece offers 2 games of your student BB from the same tournament.  In one, his rating is 1458; in the other, it is 1611.  That strikes me as a large point swing for 1 tournament.  Is that typical?  (I haven't played an OTB game in close to 40 years so I may be out of touch).

  • 5 months ago

    Towerwood

    Great article!

  • 5 months ago

    Kijiri

    Awesome as always! 

  • 5 months ago

    huesome

    excellent article. and for those who are saying that its not right just to think about dark squares and dark bishop..the article is about what u have and ur opponent lacks and making full use of it,wheather it be ur dark bishop or white ....thanku for the great article it is insanely beneficial for an ameteur like me has changed the way i see chess  

  • 5 months ago

    de_sh_pande

    wt if white played 5. Bd3 ??

  • 5 months ago

    savantz

    @unquarked

    you pointedly refer to the bishop (I'm guessing because the article does) but the knight can just as well take advantage of a "dark or light square" weakness.

    but here's the REAL point - - - this WHOLE concept IS inherently predicated on PAWN STRUCTURE.

    I suggest you play through the article's positions again

  • 5 months ago

    Marcokim

    @marco and unquarked... IM Silman is giving a basis for chess strategy. This guy has existing dark square weaknesses, he gives up a dark squared bishop for a Knight - proabbly not great chess given the position.

    In its simplest form this is a basis for a strategic plan. The question is, what is the most efficient way to take advantage of this? Optimum resources minimal time? One answer may lie on how you use your own DS Bishop in co-ordination with other piece(s)

    The great chess teacher Roman once said that he can tell whether a young player will become a GM - just look at how they evaluate transactions? Do they consider TIME, SPACE and MATERIAL in 3 dimensions? Or are they just over-developed tactical players? Transactions being moves that involve exchange or potential exchange of material.

    A very useful article to any sub-2000 player.

Back to Top

Post your reply: