Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!
You must be logged in to edit this page.

En passant

Last updated on Wed, 04/13/2011 at 3:18am.

En passant (from French: "in [the pawn's] passing") is a maneuver in chess when a player moves a pawn two squares forward from its starting position, and an opposing pawn could have captured it if it had only moved one square forward. The En passant rule was introduced in 1490 once the rule allowed pawns to move up two squares on the first move so the pawns can not have too much power or freedom.

In this situation, the opposing pawn may, on the immediately subsequent move, capture the pawn as if it had only moved one square forward; the resulting position would then be the same as if the pawn had only moved one square forward and the opposing pawn had captured normally. En passant must be done on the very next turn, or the right to do so is lost.

Here is an example:

 

 In the second diagram, White can NOT capture en passant:

 

White can not take here either:
En passant captures are use in chess composition. Many Retrograde analysis problems utilize this fancy captures.
 
Black could only have moved c7-c5 last move, allowing 1.bxc6 e.p.# 

Comments:

by AlecKeen - 4 years ago
Chester, England Ireland
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 191
This is a throwback to the period before the pawns were allowed to move 2 squares forward on the first move. Before then pawns could only move one square forward at any time, resulting in many boring defensive matches. The 2-square move was introduced to encourage more positive play and quicker development of the pieces. However, some of the more attacking players felt that their opponents were using the move to dodge being captured by the forceful player, already on the 5th rank while the slowcoaches were still on their starting square. Consequently, the en passant rule was introduced to ensure that attacking play did not grow unrewarded when defenders used the 2-square move for a purely defensive purpose. It is analogous to the rule that prevents castling across squares under attack by an opposition piece. 
by Trickster - 4 years ago
Mississauga, ON Canada
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 232
I think its sort of a Quirky move! no offence!
by sk8erkid - 4 years ago
Moscow Russia
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 376
kool
by chrisse23 - 4 years ago
London England
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 4

If I had a penny for every time I got done by this when I first started playing online... I'd have about 8p.

by K3bool - 4 years ago
Riyadh Saudi Arabia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 30

it's the first time i hear about it ...i see it but i've not recognized it

 

by cioly - 4 years ago
iasi Romania
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 7
i did quite many times...i like it its quite funny:))) especially when the other player doesn't take this move as a possibility
by bosco - 4 years ago
Poland
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 237
I once managed to capture 3 pawns with this rule. Its soo cool!
by Darth_Rabidus - 4 years ago
ballarat, vic Australia
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 94
i have never seen this move before... i will have to use it against a friend of mine... he wont know what hit him!
by archerfish123 - 4 years ago
Hertfordshire United Kingdom
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 94
I've just been caught out by it!! Never again!!!
by Rael - 4 years ago
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 5084

 

How do you enter the move into Chess.com? 


by 7thllSpirit - 4 years ago
Dubai United Arab Emirates
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 39

this En passant move cost me a winnning game in a tournament..CryCry

i saw this move when i play chess in my Phone..but thought it is some bug in the software...

never seen it when played agaist other players...waaai...Yell

after my game & knowing the rule, I thought of shooting the one who introduced this rule..hehe 


by Jimmyjoke - 4 years ago
Kent England
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 8
I just accuesd someone for using a illgeal download doing this move on me. opps!!!!
by mercytononeZ - 4 years ago
New Orleans,LA United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1946

thats really cool!!

 

 

by babatee - 4 years ago
kano Nigeria
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 23
one is always able to use this towards the end of the game and its always @ winning advantage.
by shadowslayer - 4 years ago
Grand Rapids, Michigan United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 1851
thanks for the example otherwise I would be lost
by NotKasparov - 3 years ago
Delaware United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 373
I was playing my friend in chess on a cell phone, and I was going to win easily by using en passant - but the phone's chess program didn't allow this!  I won anyway, but it was much harder.
by 14yearold - 3 years ago
Florida United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 17
not many people know this rule. 4 out of 5 times when i used this move my opponent said that i was cheating lol.
by ednorton - 3 years ago
Madison, Wisconsin United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 29

   You might think of en passant in this way.

   When foot soldiers actually did battle, they attacked diagonally upon their foe. Hence the diagonal pawn capture. In a real battle, a soldier moving forward would always run the the risk of being attacked by another soldier. You couldn't just run by magically. The opponent might let you by...but you never knew. En passant is similar to this analogy. A pawns optional 2 square first move is like trying to run by an opponent. You might get by...you might not.


by dvwork - 3 years ago
Phoenix United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 94
The option to use this is really an advantage in endgame scenarios.  If you are using it early on, it is likely not really to your advantage, to prevent some opposing situation because you lost the tempo, or you aren't playing chess, because the tendency in openings and even early middlegame is that this will leave you with a weakened pawn structure but an advanced pawn that you will have to throw away or find a way to defend.  I may be wrong but this has been my experience.  You don't see it used all that often in master+ games.
by Davidmingming - 3 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 1203
Why did the second diagram say 1/2 1/2, it is not a draw.

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.