15538 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
that is funny, but I feel that that gives black something, not an attack, but it feels right, fight fire with fire.
I get the feeling that no matter how I argue or what I say I'm never going to convince this twerp that he really isnt in a position where he can refute openings..
here is why, white has nothing special either
that is again coming from a guy who only plays recreationaly, and plays ultra quickly, and on another site has a high 1400 rating.
....nb5.... your stupid rd8 loses material again.You're not smart.
Played a senior at my high school twice in chess today. Two wins with the Parham, about 20 moves each.
It should be obvious that the opening is not the problem here...
I will only advise the four knights as it will be easier to play this:
But one is 3 moves in, one is 10. That's not a very fair comparison.
But why not have the first 3 moves go like this?
I've looked in databases about this move, and it seems that in the next few moves almost all players exchange the d4 knight for the c6 one. This leads to rather drawish play
i dont know why you feel its drawish. its incredible complicated where any mistake from white or black may cost them the game.here is a random game by kasparov-I.sokolov yerevan 1996
I'd rather have a chance of doing that then none at all. There are also tons of other trappy lines (that jetfighter so kindly pointed out in his "refutations").
Expecting traps like that is unrealistic. The point of the Parham is to castle queenside and pawnstorm so do that. If they screw up with g6 then fine but don't expect that to happen often.
I'd rather have a chance of that happening then none at all though. I don't expect it, but it's nice in the rare chance it happens.
I know, the Parham is about the winning position, but there are also many players who drop material early in the game. They didn't do that in the game you played, but the Parham still allowed you to get good position.
That's funny, because we already posted his name, he has been rated in the 1700's.
yes bruce i checked it, josh a harrison is rated about 1750.
this is my last attempt, whatup, Though I do agre black screwed up, We dissagree on where, you say 1... e5, I say its in the later stages of the opening.
just look at the parenthetical, I am not trying to refute the opening, just make it so that people relize that black has a decent to good position from it.
well of course black has a decent position, it's a stupid opening.
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by btickler a few minutes ago
That was naughty
by TheSamuraiSan a few minutes ago
Position in the Dragon Sicilian
by Douginator a few minutes ago
by jerry1228 5 minutes ago
7/25/2014 - Sahovic - Karolyi 1986
by jerry1228 7 minutes ago
I Don't See the Point of the Touch-Move Rule
by Mersaphe 9 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal Opening Traps
by Bereng 9 minutes ago
IS A Pawn Brave or Cowadly. to Promote?
by SilentKnighte5 11 minutes ago
Only a 40 year break...
by Snookslayer 13 minutes ago
sicilian frand prix
by skotheim2 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!