Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Caro-Kann Study Group (1.e4 c6)


  • 7 days ago · Quote · #161

    11qq11

    wow.  that chessmentor lesson did not even mention that Bxf5 Nxf5 Qa5+ wins a pawn.

  • 6 days ago · Quote · #162

    X_PLAYER_J_X

    @ Roofslovepizza

    I believe 5...Qc7 is the best move for black in that position. In human databases black does pretty good with that move.

    I on the other hand like playing 5...g6 which I consider to be the second best move in that position.

    @ ilikecapablanca

    White has a few reasons on why they play the move 6.h4 here.

    • One reason they play the move 6.h4 is so they can trap blacks light square bishop.

    As you can see if black plays a dumb move here. White will than play 7.h5 and the light square bishop has no were to go. It is literally trapped. Which is usually why black is forced to respond to 6.h4 with the move 6...h6. Giving the bishop an escape square on h7.

    • Another reason is white usually trys to gain space on the king side.

    The reason they try and gain space on the king side is because they usually attack on the king side. This is partly do to the knight maneuvers which they played Nc3 - Nxe4 - Ng3. In a sense they are attacking where alot of there pieces will be. Which makes perfect sense. Attack on the area of the board you have the most pieces and most space. So by playing h4 they gain space and they will have more pieces on that side for attacks.

    Now if we look at the move 6.f4 here notice the difference.

    One thing we can notice is white is threating the move 7.f5 trapping the bishop. Which black has to respond to do.

    However, Do you see the difference between 6.f4 (7.f5) and 6.h4 (7.h5)?

    When white plays 6.h4 with the threat of 7.h5. Black really only has 1 safing bishop response to stop that. Which is (6...h6)

    However, with the move 6.f4 with the threat of 7.f5. Black has 2 responses to safe the bishop. Do you see them?

    6...h6 is one move. The other move is 6...e6.

    6...e6 is how black should respond to 6...f4.

    Which it might seem like a very dumb or subtle difference. However, Black is playing the Caro-Kann. They try to crush people because of subtle differences.

    When you really think about it. 6.h4 forces black to play the move 6...h6 which doesn't really help black a whole lot. It doesn't really active any of blacks pieces it is just an escaping square.

    When you play 6.f4 on the other hand. The response 6...e6 stops the f5 threat and at the same time develops a piece. Blacks dark square bishop is now active.

    A small victory for black I would say.

  • 6 days ago · Quote · #164

    AlexCMA

    Hi I hope it's ok to post this here. I'm looking to take up the caro-kann classical BF5 variation. I have the starting out book. I prefer solid, quite, positional lines could you recommend me a book to follow on from the starting out book please? The move by move would have been perfect but unfortunately it only covers the modern ND7 as the mainline variation and apparently the grandmaster repurtouie lars schandorff covers sharp tactical lines.

    What book would you recommend?

    Thanks

  • 6 days ago · Quote · #165

    ilikecapablanca



  • 6 days ago · Quote · #166

    ilikecapablanca

    Chess Mentor only goes as far as h4.

  • 3 days ago · Quote · #167

    mashanator

    Both f5 and h5 are terrible moves in those positions. After h5 the pawn only becomes a target Black really doesn't need, and after f5 one wonders why you spent time getting the bishop out of the pawn chain in the first place, let alone weakened everything in the centre.

  • 3 days ago · Quote · #168

    ilikecapablanca

    What do you suggest, then?

  • 3 days ago · Quote · #169

    mashanator

    Against f4, a simple set up with e6, Bd6, Ne7 and Nb8-d7-f6 is plenty to make it look silly. After h4, there is nothing wrong with the main lines with h6. h5 is just a bad move.


Back to Top

Post your reply: