Lol only a 1450 on chesscube? I'm an 1850 bro, 1531s will fall for just about anything.
How to Blast out Kings gambit???
But to be serious, move 3 was an inaccuracy, Nf6 is better to attack e4 and to allow the d5 push. Just so you get an idea of how people this level play, here's a game I just had recently played on chesscube against a 1470:
If you want to play aggressively, play the danish.
It is not sound, (http://www.chess.com/article/view/danish-cracker)
but it will teach you more about attacking chess than your Qh5.
The danish: 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Bc4 cxb2 5.Bxb2
There's a well known line to take all aggressiveness out of the Danish, don't know it off the top of my head, but I've seen it a few times.
Lol I took exactly what you said and disproved it, you just can't deal with being wrong, so you attack me. Typical immature response.
And actually, he is a USCF 1700, you just are too stupid to see that...
Gavinator, maybe if you played less dubious openings, you would be above 1250 uscf... Not that openings matter much at your level. Yet you seem to argue a lot (troll) about it here instead of playing games.
Travis1010 is right, he's actually is at about 1250. They post USCF ratings publicly on their website, uschess.org. I would like to know who whatupyodog really was though, so we can see if he really was rated 1700+ (doubtful).
used to is the key word, anyway, that was very kind whatup, change of heart maybe, seem nice. Gavinator is still the same old Gavinator, calling people dumb and well, yeah, anyway, my opponent didn't fall for anything in that KG on the last page, I would suggest you remove the Parham game because it isn't pertanent to the forum topic, also what was the Time control.
well you already said that, wow that is suprising that that is 15 min, I normally play 15 30 and 60 min games, yet for some reason I can't stop playing so quickly.
I'm shocked to find out that a 1600-1700 would play the parham. At my chess club all they play is both sides of the queen's and bogo indian. Gets quite boring after a while. 1800's to 2000's are more fun, they play sharp lines such as the botvinnik and anti-moscow, as well as some major pawn sacs in the dutch benoni, and play goes wild (I usually lose very quickly in sharp variations I don't understand very well). Most GM level players I've played play slower openings that aren't flat out repetitive and boring, and get a slight advantage out of the opening. Players lower than my rating (currently 1500, but underated) are the ones who play random openings such as the budapest, parham, random double fianchetto's, etc. Granted I always play at the same club so I'm usually playing the same people everytime. I'll get to see some new players this week at the Chicago open, a much bigger tournament.
I can offer trends though, and I'm not underated because I've played on chesscube or something, I'm underated because I only started playing chess in december or so.
2012-06 | 1554 | 1430 | ||
2012-05 | 1339 | 1256 | ||
2012-04 | 1326 (P25) | 1212 (P22) | ||
2012-03 | 1239 (P16) | 1224 (P16) | ||
2012-02 | 1096 (P08) | 1074 (P08) | ||
2011-12 | 694 (P04) | 686 (P04) |
My rating has been increasing at 100+ rating points a month, which is probably an indication that I'm underated.
here is a recent win I had with the KG