Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

New Opening - ATROCIOUS OPENING - for White and Black - no way to be escaped


  • 23 months ago · Quote · #61

    Philly_door

    LongIslandMark wrote:
    Philly_door wrote:

    By the way - my spell checker doesn't work . Does anybody have the same prpblem ?

    Yes - spell chgecker is brokeen

    I hope they are mending it, but obviously, are not very much in a hurry.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #62

    TetsuoShima

    Philly_door wrote:
    LongIslandMark wrote:
    Philly_door wrote:

    By the way - my spell checker doesn't work . Does anybody have the same prpblem ?

    Yes - spell chgecker is brokeen

    I hope they are mending it, but obviously, are not very much in a hurry.

     

    how did you find that picture?? seriously no kidding you are really really good in finding rare stuff, ever thought about the idea of becoming private detective??

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #63

    Philly_door

    xxvalakixx wrote:

    In an opening you should fight for the center, develop your pieces, and castle. This opening is just horrible.

    With such arguments were not accepted in the begining openings like 1.d4 g6 and 1.b3.

    By the way " horrible " i think is not enough for this opening - i would change " atrocious " eventualy with " obnoxious " , but am not sure which is better.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #64

    Philly_door

    TetsuoShima wrote:
    Philly_door wrote:
    LongIslandMark wrote:
    Philly_door wrote:

    By the way - my spell checker doesn't work . Does anybody have the same prpblem ?

    Yes - spell chgecker is brokeen

    I hope they are mending it, but obviously, are not very much in a hurry.

     

    how did you find that picture?? seriously no kidding you are really really good in finding rare stuff, ever thought about the idea of becoming private detective??

    Sounds nice, but is probably not for me - i find pictures mostly by chance.

    The idea for this opening is not mine - the real author lives in Paris ( under a bridge ) :

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #65

    finns

    The opening as white should be called the Brilliant Defence. As black it should be called the Brilliant Attack. An attack is an opening for white, a defence is an openning for black

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #66

    Likhit1

    An opening which breaks all opening principles for no reason can never be good.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #67

    Philly_door

    finns wrote:

    The opening as white should be called the Brilliant Defence. As black it should be called the Brilliant Attack. An attack is an opening for white, a defence is an openning for black

    Thanks, very polite of you if you are serious Smile I can agree with white attack and black defence - an extra tempo costs much.

    About brilliant, it will depend on whether it will be refuted or not.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #68

    finns

    No, the opening with white is brilliant for black, and vice versa.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #69

    Timothy_P

    finns wrote:

    No, the opening with white is brilliant for black, and vice versa.

    True.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #70

    Philly_door

    finns wrote:

    No, the opening with white is brilliant for black, and vice versa.

    Uf, now the things are normal again, i just begun to worry...

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #71

    Philly_door

    Likhit1 wrote:

    An opening which breaks all opening principles for no reason can never be good.

    Don't you suppose, there can be uninvented yet opening principles ?

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #72

    Likhit1

    Philly_door wrote:
    Likhit1 wrote:

    An opening which breaks all opening principles for no reason can never be good.

    Don't you suppose, there can be uninvented yet opening principles ?

    Ok.So tell me the uninvented opening pricnicples.

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #73

    AssauIt

    Likhit1 wrote:
    Philly_door wrote:
    Likhit1 wrote:

    An opening which breaks all opening principles for no reason can never be good.

    Don't you suppose, there can be uninvented yet opening principles ?

    Ok.So tell me the uninvented opening pricnicples.

    1.Move only pawns. If you move the same pawn 6 times (sometimes 5!!) it becomes a queen. However no matter how many times you move a knight it will still be weak. INVEST IN PAWN POWER!

    2.An endgame may come at any moment, centralise your king.

    3.Don't move your pieces past your pawns, its dangerous out there.



  • 23 months ago · Quote · #74

    Philly_door

    Likhit1 wrote:
    Philly_door wrote:
    Likhit1 wrote:

    An opening which breaks all opening principles for no reason can never be good.

    Don't you suppose, there can be uninvented yet opening principles ?

    Ok.So tell me the uninvented opening pricnicples.

    I would like to, but unfortunately, i am not him - he was very capable in such things :

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #75

    Likhit1

    Ok.So,you are assuming that your opening follows some unknown principles.Nice!

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #76

    Philly_door

    AssauIt wrote:
    Likhit1 wrote:
    Philly_door wrote:
    Likhit1 wrote:

    An opening which breaks all opening principles for no reason can never be good.

    Don't you suppose, there can be uninvented yet opening principles ?

    Ok.So tell me the uninvented opening pricnicples.

    1.Move only pawns. If you move the same pawn 6 times (sometimes 5!!) it becomes a queen. However no matter how many times you move a knight it will still be weak. INVEST IN PAWN POWER!

    2.An endgame may come at any moment, centralise your king.

    3.Don't move your pieces past your pawns, its dangerous out there.



    And here i see a realy fresh glance on the mather ! I corect my previous post - a new Nimzovich can apear any moment !

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #77

    Fatalpixels

    This is the worst opening of all time. o_0

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #78

    DAVID_CARRUTHERS

    it would confuse the opponent,he would not know what was going on.i think a group of players need to test out the new opening ,and post there games here so it can be accurately judged,so before you throw the first stone ,lets put it to the test, who,s going first.Laughing

  • 23 months ago · Quote · #79

    Philly_door

    Thanks, David, it is a good idea, but the opening is atrocious and hardly will be many candidates.

    A simpatetic guy and strong player became a toll of this strange way of moveing pieces :



  • 23 months ago · Quote · #80

    Philly_door

    P.S.

    In the final part of the game i have 2 pawns more, but we both were not good with time and i made a few mistakes.


Back to Top

Post your reply: