Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Philidor's Defense

Jump to forum:
 
17th September 2008, 09:58am
#1
by pvmike
Voorhees, NJ United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1063

A lot of people have been playing Philidor's Defense against me lately, and I was wonding why. It really allows white easy developement while it blocks in black's kingside bishop. Are people playing this to avoid the Ruy or other opeing systems, and if so why not play Petrov's Defense.

18th September 2008, 03:53pm
#2
by KnightlyKing
Suly Iraq
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 2723

i often play that... i got many wins with this opening..at first black has a  crampled position but then it can make an attack..or a counterattack

18th September 2008, 04:12pm
#3
by MainStreet
Philippines
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 3767

Aftewhich, Black fianchettos his Bishop on g7, creating a King's Indian Defense... and then makes an attack on the Queen side.

18th September 2008, 04:16pm
#4
by pvmike
Voorhees, NJ United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1063

I would think if somebody wanted a kings indian type defense the would play the pirc

18th September 2008, 04:26pm
#5
by MainStreet
Philippines
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 3767
pvmike wrote:

I would think if somebody wanted a kings indian type defense the would play the pirc


For me, Pirc and Philidor-KID are cousins.

A matter of preference is regarding the King's Pawn. Some like Pirc maintaining the King's pawn at e7, or restraining it at e6, or later on pushing it to e5.

Some prefer Philidor, as they want to immediately block the e4 and e5 squares.  Of course, both intend to launch an attack on the Queen side, with the King's Bishop being maintained to protect the King's camp.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.