9663 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have read that 3... d3 takes the "teeth" out of the Smith-Morra but others have said that Smith knew about this move and that 4. c4 is the appropriate response. Unfortunately, I don't understand the idea behind playing c4. I see that black has moved the same pawn three times and has nothing else developed and that white has two pawns developed to the 4th rank but I'm not sure how white should continue and what his goals should be.
The idea is to get a so called Maroczy Bind. You have a very strong grip on the d5-square preventing Black from playing in the center. Especially with a Nc3 ( and e4-pawn) this can be very effective. It is a theme that occurs a lot in the Sicilian.
Thank you! That's exactly the information I was looking for. :)
Do you play the Morra often Dave ? If so , what do you think of it compared to other SI-lines ? I played it a lot in the 1980's and only encountered 3. .. d3 once.
I'm only just learning it so I really can't say. I've only started to seriously play and study chess in the past year or so and I still have a lot to learn in general. I understand basic chess principles and I know at least the first few moves of most of the common openings and how to respond to them but I often struggle with knowing when to push my pawns and how to take advantage of weaknesses in my opponent's structure. I seem to have plateaued around 1450 and haven't improved much in a while. I blunder a lot too. lol
i have a friend who played the smith morra up to master but he said he used so much time on it to keep it working he might just as well have played the open sicilian
Well, the Morra is one of White's sharpest weapons against the SI and it is very tactical. The main thing for White is to develop fast , castle early and put the Queen on e2 and the rooks on d1 and e1. Then you start your attack , even saccing more material to keep it going. Black will have a hard time getting his King into savety and is walking the rope. It is not an opening for the fainthearted , you'll be on the edge of your seat throughout the game.
I love an exciting game. :)
I plan to keep playing it and learn it better. The first time I ever saw it as black I didn't know what it was and I was swiftly defeated.
Dave , if you want , we can play a friendly (unrated) Morra-game where I will be Black.
Anyway , I want to show you the only game I had facing 3. .. d3 , the declined Morra.
That sounds great! Thank you for sharing your game as well. Your annotations were helpful. :)
My rating isn't high enough to send you a challenge.
I'll add you to my friends list. Feel free to send me a challenge at your convenience.
3. ...d3?! is bad, and white is able to get an advantage against that quite easily. A Maroczy set-up with pawns on e4 and c4 is the way to go, and black's game is simply not good.
From my experience, the Smith-Morra - more often than not - gives white excellent chances. One great advantage of the smith - morra is that it your opponent is almost certainly being forced to play more of 'white's' game.
Yeah I'm sure White can get an edge in these lines. I doubt the advantage is "large" since the bishop on d3 is misplaced and there's a bit less control over d4.
Pretty much a matter of taste. Someone who's playing as Black the Accelerated Dragon would be very happy with 3...d3, since the resulting Maroczy binds are much more comfortable than the regular ones. But of course you must have good understanding of the resulting, strategically complex positions.
In IM Marc Esserman's book, the chapter about 3. ...d3?! is named:
I prefer to play 3...d5 , 3...is passive
3...dxc3 and white should think about equalizing after move 3 ! just play 2.Nf3 3.d4 (or 3.c3 sometimes) instead
This does not prove anything. Esserman projects only the bright side of his choices, and in some cases (e.g. the lines he suggests against 3...Nf6) white's claimed advantage exists only in his imagination.
Regarding 3...d3, his proof consists of some BLITZ games he has played on ICC. Are they enough for you?
I got Mayhem in the Morra for Christmas, and while I think it is a wonderfully enthusiastic book and a work of love (and in many cases, a quality theoretical piece), his answers in some other cases are either lacking or not especially objective about white's chances (although to be fair, one could write a completely separate book on 1. e4 c5 2. d4 cd4 3. c3 Nf6).
"At the end of the day, it's all about money"
by RonaldJosephCote 2 minutes ago
The strength and dependability of the Sicilian Defense as Black
by Yaroslavl 6 minutes ago
Vienna Game Book?
by erikido23 9 minutes ago
by AlCzervik 10 minutes ago
Sicilian dragon vs french defense vs open game
by Indirect 12 minutes ago
[HURT HEAL] OPENINGS
by kwankaiee 13 minutes ago
1000 reasons why we can't beat Magnus Carlsen in chess.
by rtr1129 15 minutes ago
Really Want Better Forum??
by chess_gg 17 minutes ago
What chess opening do you like the most as white?
by clunney 17 minutes ago
[HURT HEAL] Double Queen Pawn Openings
by Indirect 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!