14958 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I played the Schara gambit a few days ago and i tried a new move which i had found in the game fidler- Mayer Istvan that went 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cxd5 cxd4 5.dxe6 dxc3 6.exf7+ Ke7 7.fxg8N+ Rxg8 8.Bg5+ black resigns. Is there a way for black to improve this variation.
5. dxe6? Bxe6! When black is better.
5...Bxe6 and white already is in bad shape.
Simply 5...Bxe6 and develop quickly and black has an advantage.
sorry but i really dont see where all of this compensation for the pawn is.
6.Qxd4 loses the Queen...
no not qxd4 nb5 to put pressure on the pawn than e3 and if he takes than you exchange queens up a pawn.
6.Nb5 loses the knight.
Yeah i guess that it really was a myth sorry still its a good trap to set for beginers.
Forget it. 5. Qa4+ followed by Qxd4 and white is better
How can it be a "good trap" if White gets clearly worse by move five?
Under the same reasoning 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Qf7# is excellent: White is not clearly worse if Black reacts properly.
Some people are willing to go through any logical contortion in order to avoid playing good openings.
i dont mean that it is something that i would actually play i agree that my myth was busted and i appologize for making you go through all this trouble. i will switch back to qa4 check against the schara. Again thank you for busting my myth before i lost a rated game with it. Signing off.
And i dont usually play terrible trappy openings i just didnt analyse it properly.
It's not a "terrible trappy opening"- it's very -playable.
ifs not that its not playable its that white is in very bad shape by move five. Not a good recipe for success. Oh and Pfren i was talking about dxe6 not the Schara the Schara's certainly playable.
I was under the impression that it's almost lost for black if white follows a the simple plan of Qa4+/Qxd4/Qxd5/Qb3 (the main line)?!
I can't recall where I read the analysis, but it may have been one of GM Paul Motwani's books.
This is the newest book on the subject. According to the author (a strong IM) white has at best a slight advantage, and the opening is entirely playable at competitive level (not sure about correspondence chess).
I have told my pupils to play 5.Nc5, too- but errr, that was some 25 years ago. Still, many strong players use it, but mainly at blitz and rapid events.
At that time, only 5...b6 and 5...e5 were thought to be playable, but Black has a few more resources. To be honest, I have lost touch with it, but I do believe it's still quite playable for white.
"2015 Sinquefield Cup Round 9"
by CornerPawn 3 minutes ago
Is the Dutch Leningrad for me?
by CornerPawn 5 minutes ago
Is KG usuable at my level?
by jetfighter13 6 minutes ago
In Defense of e4
by Aquarius550 7 minutes ago
Please cast 1-5 votes for Chess.com Hall of Fame 2.0!!!
by brainiac12358 7 minutes ago
Stone Wall: d4 f5
by Pfren_Is_A_Good_Guy 8 minutes ago
How to Meet the Stonewall Attack?
by CornerPawn 9 minutes ago
Payed Membership verus Free Membership
by Diakonia 11 minutes ago
9/1/2015 - Reinforcements
by chessnyt 12 minutes ago
What to play against the Dutch
by BirdBrain 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!