16704 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I know this isn't a new idea but how about a variant involving something like the Doubling Cube in Backgammon?
The usual idea is that if there is an offer to double the stakes/points, a refusal results in a win for the offerer, and an acceptance doubles the stakes/points, leaves the option for the next double in the game for the accepter, and, different for Chess, the accepter gets Draw Odds. Therefore, the offerer MUST win to not lose. The reason for this is that in a match, one player could get ahead by one point, then double every game and play for a draw, hastening the end and a win.
Anyone have any other ideas for this variant?
I'm not sure what level of player you're thinking of?
Hmmm, could you imagine a Top (2700+) player cubing without seeing the win? Or do you think they would be speculative?
I certainly wouldn't accept if Carlsen doubles me, lol.
In BG, you Double with anything over 50% winning chances, and you accept if you have at least 25%, so very often, both sides are doing the correct thing, and more importantly, it is always at least partially speculative, if not wholly so.
I haven't worked out the math for Chess with the Draw odds, but despite what the numbers will be, I think it'll be less of who can calculate deeper and take advantage of that, and more a case of position evaluation.
I'll work out the math after I've had caffeine.
I'd like to make this work, but I have issues.
In Backgammon, you basically cube to protect yourself against bad dice. You often dont cube in totally won positions, because if your opponent declines you take away the posssibility of double or triple games.
If you cube in BG, (except against BG patzers :)) you generally WANT you opponent to decline, and pay for your current advantage. A BG advantage is much more volatile than a chess one.
"Millionaire Chess 2015: Round 1"
Can you solve this puzzle?
by Kakamou12 a few minutes ago
Dvoretsky's Endgame menual < how much dificult?
by Diakonia 3 minutes ago
Good game or bad on me?
by notmtwain 3 minutes ago
10/8/2015 - Tolush - Alatortsev, Moscow 1948
by VictorHCDM 4 minutes ago
by notmtwain 9 minutes ago
Specific position advice
by Roeczak 10 minutes ago
by mklemenz 11 minutes ago
analyzing grand masters games
by RSK_Asherz 11 minutes ago
Why should I lose to an "inactive account"
by Martin_Stahl 13 minutes ago
Victory asigned to my oponent
by notmtwain 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!