Forums

Best way to beat weaker players?

Sort:
JSB53

I'm starting to find it rather frustrating playing against weaker players. Even though I practically always win it feels like it should be easier considering how much more work and effort I've put into studying the game compared to them, this rather annoys me as it feels like the gap in skill should be larger and all that work hasn't paid off as well as it should have, anybody else feel similar to this or just me? So what do you think is the best method to beat weaker players?

Die_Schanze

I don't know your rating, your opponents ratings and which kind of work you have done. Maybe you memorized tons of opening books, but your 300 points lower rated opponent is equal strong at everything else.

Anyway 200 points difference in FIDE rating mean, that the higher rated player has a 75% expected score. That is one win and one draw in two games.

Yes, you need to fight hard in most of your games to win against such a opponent!

Even at 500 points rating difference, where the stronger player expects a 100 % score, there is sometimes a hard fight. 

 

The best way to score well is to accept the fight. Sometimes you'll get a quick and easy win, sometimes you win after a hard, long fight and sometimes you don`t win.

Zendaddy0

thinking like that is probably why you're having such a hard time. you need to respect every opponent you play against regardless of skill otherwise they'll catch you off guard.

Ziggy_Zugzwang
JSB53 wrote:

I'm starting to find it rather frustrating playing against weaker players.

I think you probably mean :"Why can't I win more quickly ? "

I think this is the wrong question. The question should be: "How can I make sure of the right result and not be bothered about the length of the game ?"

I suggest your impatience, which we all recognise and can relate to, is an indicator of a need for greater chess maturity. Not having a go at you, because I think many of us suffer from this syndrome.

0110001101101000

I experienced this against one player in particular. After working hard to get better (over maybe a year) more and more I noticed he always made minor mistakes all through the game. I felt like I should win every time, but it was difficult. I would score about 80% but I hated even drawing one game, and sometimes he would win!

This made me work even more, and eventually I could beat him all the time. But basically it's as other people said, they're not as bad as you think. The mistakes are annoying because you know better, but they're not game losing mistakes, they only give you a good game if you play very well from there to the end.

So one way to help is to round out your game. Maybe you have an opening advantage but you lack the middlegame ability to exploit it. Same for the endgame. Maybe you struggle with closed positions, or attacks on the king, etc. (For me I had to work on my endgame.)

As for weaker players, there's no one way to beat them. Everyone has different strengths. Play towards your strengths and honestly work on your weaknesses after the game.

aln67

A ancient master said once "It's not enough to be a good player, you still have to play well" !

JSB53

Thanks for the advice

EchoThat
Lesser skilled players are tougher in a way than more skilled players. They may not follow strategies the way that you would think. They move without strong rationale. They also help me understand the game better when I attempt to explain where they went wrong. Just enjoy it all and have fun.