8388 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I played two games with Computer2-MEDIUM 10|10, and it played a ridiculously bad Endgame in both the games. I agree I played really bad, but so did the Computer in the end.
I must specify "in the end", because Computer had an advantage of a Queen (by promotion). The game was left with me with nothing but a King, and the Computer with a Queen, which is sufficient for a mate. But it just whiled its time around, giving Checks, and the game ended by the 50-move rule in both the cases.
That was really a "self-embarrassment" by the Computer2-MEDIUM. Hadn't expected that from a robot. Probably only Computer4-IMPOSSIBLE and Computer3-HARD have a QK vs. K mate programmed into them.
I guarantee you the computer was not embarrassed. That's one of the great things about them.
But this computer played "normal" (for his rating).http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtH-reY3PD8&feature=g-upl&context=G2ddac9bAUAAAAAAAAAA
Yes, I've played the medium computer many times and agree that it has no conception of endgames. It's pretty easy to get a 50-move draw out of it, even after getting into a dead lost position, and I've been bored enough to do this on several occasions! I'm not sure if that's part of the programming that they dumb down to make it "medium" or if the hard and impossible also do this too... haven't had the chance to beat them yet :-)
I must say, I am surprised at the medium computer's inability to checkmate with a Queen. I might expect that of Computer1-EASY (or perhaps it could stumble for a while but eventually--say, within 30-40 moves--achieve the mate, depending on the player's moves), but Computer2-MEDIUM should definitely be programmed to execute that pattern.
Even the impossible computer can play badly in the endgame. In spite of my feeble skills, here are two games where I stole a half-point in each because it messed up.
@Bab3s, 86. Qg3 Kh6 87. Qg6#
Computers never win.................unless on time or in the opening and middlegame but they never win in the endgame;computer hard gave me mercy
Actually, the computer would play 86...c3, but 87. Kf6 will mate next move.
@Bab3s: Excellent examples, but you wouldn't see this high level of computer fumble a K+Q v. K endgame in its favor.
@browni3141: 86. ... c6.
I play on COMPUTER-1 EASY and I got some defeats, mostly wins, but rarely draws. In fact, if I can remember, I think we had no draws. Always pounces on missing checkmates. But it blunders away pieces!
LOL...it must have been boring to play 50 moves...without any real events occuring!
7 queens, checkmate with knight:
what type of player are you
by rmurray a few minutes ago
White wins. How?
by NimzoRoy a few minutes ago
Posting of girly photos on chess.com
by BorgQueen a few minutes ago
En passant for other than pawns
by corrijean 5 minutes ago
by BorgQueen 5 minutes ago
play VS computer
by Scrambler009 13 minutes ago
First blog post
by rmurray 16 minutes ago
A recurring blunder I see from people trying the Scholar's Mate
by xbigboy 16 minutes ago
My Journey into Chess as a newcomer (very long)
by 8130858 16 minutes ago
Massacre in the Morra.
by Randomemory 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com