Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Chess rating system


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1241

    ChazR

    I regret to inform that you are all wrong.  There is a direct statistical correlation between ratings and anatomy.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1242

    pooptastesgood

    EVERYONE HERE THINKS POOP TASTES GOOD

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1243

    pooptastesgood

    Please be relevant, helpful and nice

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1244

    Yamada1998Sone

    Knight for me! I love it how I captured Queen when I checked the King lol <3 

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1245

    ChazR

    Apologies if I was irrelevant, hurtful, and mean.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1246

    verydead2

    Maybe these questions are stupid but I dont care:

    What is the approximate relation between chess.com rating and FIDE rating? 

    What approximate chess.com rating should have a player with FIDE rating e.g. 1800?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1247

    wilford-n

    verydead wrote:

    What is the approximate relation between chess.com rating and FIDE rating? 

    Based on brousing profiles of active players, it appears that FIDE ratings most closely correspond to Online Play ratings here, and chess.com ratings are inflated by about 200 points. So to answer your second question, FIDE 1800 ≈ chess.com 2000.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1248

    TonyMooney

    I agree that FIDE tournament ratings should most closely correspond to Online ratings but I suspect the gap is wider than 200 points and increases at higher levels. A player with a 2,400 FIDE rating would score higher than 2,600 at Online on Chess.com. It is hard to be precise but as a guess FIDE 1800 - C.com 2200. Interested to hear what other people think.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1249

    ChazR

    The elo rating system is an extremely accurate method of determining not only your strength, but the likelihood of chances of winning when you go against another player.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1250

    Scottrf

    joeschmo123 wrote:

    higher ranked players arent necessarily any better they just make fewer mistakes

    Well that's an oxymoron. Chess is a game of eliminating errors.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1251

    deencarney

    pawnshover wrote:

    Everyone knows a higher rating makes you a better person, increases your wealth, makes people nod in agreement when you speak, and whitens your teeth.

    The hideous secret is that there IS NO RATING SYSTEM. They use a super-secret method to hand out ratings based on baseball statistics and tax forms.

    In computing technology we just call it a random number generator.

    Seriously, The rating is mainly useful for assessing your personal growth by just comparing it to your previous rating of a few months ago. Comparing ratings is like measuring your weight. It is a number that will change based on different variables. You weigh more after eating than before and you play better if you are rested than if you are fatigued.

    It is best to just use your rating a few time a year. Most of use will have those 100 point drops and 100 point gains. so really your rating is just an estimate of the median of the range of your rating in chess.

    LMAAOO love the sarcasm pawnshover

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1252

    sorouush

    hi

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1253

    sorouush

    nice

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1254

    AnkitshahIT

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1255

    voldermort123

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1256

    voldermort123

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1257

    ChazR

    Let's go back to the original question.  You were given an approximate rating os 1200 as a benchmark.  Everyone has to start somewhere.  What you do with that beginning is your business.  

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1258

    voldermort123

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1259

    proletariate

    Ratings are like badges and certificates, they dont mean anything, what matters is what you do and produce.  If you want a true rating then play for real in tournaments and play against "rated" players, for me the online chess ratings have no meaning, using the explore features and anlysis features is not something you can do across a real board, you need to do it in your head, I am not good enough to know if im playing someone who is using Fritz or Rybka or whatever, so i dont bother worrying about, I play, i either win or lose, if im 270 or 2700 it means nothing in the end, it is only each game you play that matters at all, and in the real end we all end up in the same box (in chess and life).

    I play Chess because i can and i enjoy it, the end.

    Peace

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1260

    IckyIke


Back to Top

Post your reply: