If you missed my apology earlier, I felt I owed it to you to say it again and include a few facts for why. I had gotten GO and Reversi confused. I blundered bad. I wanted to tell you that I don't know enough about GO to corroborate your opinion as factual in my opinion, but I did try it once and realized it was invovled enough that I decided, instead of trying to get good at it, I would rather stick to chess. I already knew much more about it.

I don't know much about Go at all, but since the board has more squares than chess, there's more possible moves. There's a game called Campaigning for Northern Africa, that's supposed to be harder than hell too.

Chess is really hard. Specially when a sore losser oponent whips you with it.

Tiddlywinks?  What?  Never heard of that until now.

I tried playing Shogi before. It took much longer for me to improve than chess.

for one thing for sure, it'S hard to answer you r question

Complexity is relative, the nature of chess leads to stategy and calculation. 

Simply because there are more options does not make a situation more complicated. 

Computers are better at Chess than Go because of the nature of how a computer operates. 

Could a computer discern which is better, Coke or Pepsi?  Or to explain the beauty of a Van Goh compared to a sketch by a preschooler on the fridge?  Questions equally impossible to calculate, although there is a disparity in the, level of difficulty. 

Go is more a game of strategy, quite visceral, visual and simply does not lend to cold, deliberate calculation.

Van Gogh... Sorry Vincent...

That's what I thought too. I figured that explanation made more sense. I just needed someone to remind me of that.