11881 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
helltank if you found a forced winning line vs the Sicillian I would think you were the best player on this planet and several other planets and that you overlooked the chance to become a multi millionaire by just using the line to beat other players in a tournament.
Pushing the boundaries of Moral Dilemmas once again:
Ok, you've been under a big strain, what with the 25 online games you are playing at the moment in your two favorite openings. You knew you wanted to play certain-certain variation on page xxx in the Ponziani Power book but you wanted to run one certain line against your chess engine. But now you are 3 (locked in) moves away from the variation and are considering the moral dilemma of doing so now since it is so close to the variaton you meant to study. What if it was 10 moves? 2 moves, or 1 move away from the variation? So far as I know, the Chess.com policy only constrains on the move. So far, I'm sleeping soundly, (no conscience problems).
Yes, there is a possible problem here. I have had that problem myself. Suggest just to be careful, no more analysis on the chess machine for now as it might lead to a future position.
I generally won't analyze any ongoing game position, that has had 10-15 or more moves played in it give or take (if it's very early in the opening and there are many options this is more of a possible grey area), that could directly arise from it. So for example, I wouldn't analyze a position that came about by me playing out (by myself) 5 moves, move-by-move, from a position I obtained from an ongoing game I am playing. That seems like a good way to err on the side of caution.
I'm not sure on the exact rules, as that would be hard to determine, but I do think it's courteous to try hard to not make the mistake of looking at computer analysis of a position that will most likely occur soon in one of your games. Or at least don't do so deliberately, but even though we can't always not make accidental mistakes, we can make them much less likely if we take a cautious approach.
If of course it's really that important to you to analyze a certain line, just resign the on-going game to ensure that you are not making use of an unfair advantage. It's better that the analyzing of the position comes at your expense rather than your opponent's.
I agree with you and have been doing exactly that for the same reason, I just wanted another opinion.
Stevie Stewart from Lexington, TX
by johns2mc 3 minutes ago
by gssleader 4 minutes ago
Note to self...
by Panzerkampfwagen_V 4 minutes ago
4/26/2015 - Mate in 2
by drekie89 7 minutes ago
anyone wanting to get friends
by now_and_zen 7 minutes ago
What do you say one move from mating your opponent!
by varelse1 12 minutes ago
DOES THE FOOD WE EAT EFFECTS THE RATE OF WINNIG IN CHESS?
by tkbunny 12 minutes ago
Kasparov v. Short
by Chicken_Monster 17 minutes ago
All together (why not?)
by power_2_the_people 18 minutes ago
beccoming a staff member.
by Grundelplith_MD 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!