11522 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Pushing the boundaries of Moral Dilemmas once again:
Ok, you've been under a big strain, what with the 25 online games you are playing at the moment in your two favorite openings. You knew you wanted to play certain-certain variation on page xxx in the Ponziani Power book but you wanted to run one certain line against your chess engine. But now you are 3 (locked in) moves away from the variation and are considering the moral dilemma of doing so now since it is so close to the variaton you meant to study. What if it was 10 moves? 2 moves, or 1 move away from the variation? So far as I know, the Chess.com policy only constrains on the move. So far, I'm sleeping soundly, (no conscience problems).
Yes, there is a possible problem here. I have had that problem myself. Suggest just to be careful, no more analysis on the chess machine for now as it might lead to a future position.
I generally won't analyze any ongoing game position, that has had 10-15 or more moves played in it give or take (if it's very early in the opening and there are many options this is more of a possible grey area), that could directly arise from it. So for example, I wouldn't analyze a position that came about by me playing out (by myself) 5 moves, move-by-move, from a position I obtained from an ongoing game I am playing. That seems like a good way to err on the side of caution.
I'm not sure on the exact rules, as that would be hard to determine, but I do think it's courteous to try hard to not make the mistake of looking at computer analysis of a position that will most likely occur soon in one of your games. Or at least don't do so deliberately, but even though we can't always not make accidental mistakes, we can make them much less likely if we take a cautious approach.
If of course it's really that important to you to analyze a certain line, just resign the on-going game to ensure that you are not making use of an unfair advantage. It's better that the analyzing of the position comes at your expense rather than your opponent's.
I agree with you and have been doing exactly that for the same reason, I just wanted another opinion.
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by The_Ghostess_Lola a few minutes ago
Top Blogger (Woot!)
by kiwi 2 minutes ago
Best Chess.com members.
by bb_gum234 3 minutes ago
How committed are you?
by MikeD757 8 minutes ago
by GoldenKiwi 13 minutes ago
What do we do now that we are out of good FORUM TOPICS.
by Foxxy_Cleopatra 17 minutes ago
Very hard yet fun chess puzzle!! Care to try?
by lightningplayer 18 minutes ago
My loss to a 2007 OTB
by bb_gum234 19 minutes ago
Can you really become a class A player by studying tactics?
by PaulEChess 20 minutes ago
Why do Sicilian players hate 2.c3?
by Elubas 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!