16922 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What seems to be most chess players:
"Other than [books, videos, magazines, and/or websites] I never studied. And [discounting tournaments I went to] I didn't play any serious games. And mostly I really only [other than clubs I attended weekly] played online. In fact even online I [other than the long games] never really played serious games, only 1/0 games.And other than [strong players and friends I analyzed with] I never REALLY had a coach or mentor of any kind.Considering how I've [pretty much] never studied, played a serous game, analyzed my games, or been coached I think my rating is very good! And discounting all those years I did all or some of those things it only took me a very short time too."
The only way to play chess without studying or practice is to play your very first game of chess with no previous knowledge of it. So I'd guess that'd be a rating of 300 max.
Nobody has every won their first 50 games.
So at some time you lost. When you lost you had to figure why you lost. So bla bla bla you seriously studied. Now if your played you and do not give me no friend played you in a game ok a family member then cut the cheese. Sure they pulled out all those quick mates and traps beginners do not know. And naturally they did not tell you how to stop it at first. Bla bla bla you studied seriously not to have it happen again.
If you know the name of openings, famaliar with GM's history, have a good understanding of mobility of pieces, tactics and etc then you seriously studied the game of chess to be good at it.
Hey when they have an interface directly with the brain ....
..... well it be possible to be instantly a GM.
Well for me I studied up until I was about 1650 USCF. Then I didn't study or studied very little, and in about 1.5 years, Tada! I'm 1932 USCF now. 😉
INFINITY AND BEYOND!!!
Well nobody cares how old you are here. You can be 5 years old and lie and get in :-) I am 11 though.
Also, from 1650 to 1932, I have probably done maybe 60-80 chess puzzles. In 1.5 years. That's not good :-)
11 and 1932 USCF?
Yeah. Its true. Search up Derek Zhang on USCF Ratings.
I believe you, just impressed.
Do you ever...play chess naked?
10/4/2015 - Forced Mate
by namotheidiota a few minutes ago
Knight vs Rook with pawns majority
by luisfelipe2015 2 minutes ago
Sanity check for my opening repertoire.
by hicetnunc 7 minutes ago
Blitz and standard rating
by EliTeDavee 7 minutes ago
Which side do you prefer here?
by NativeChessMinerals 25 minutes ago
QGD game as black
by dalubor 26 minutes ago
Was this good play from white?
by Tobiashermansen 26 minutes ago
Any Good Books on This?
by hicetnunc 27 minutes ago
Frensh Winawer With (h4) Very Sharp Move
by MuhammedAwad 34 minutes ago
Why are women not as successful as men in chess?
by NativeChessMinerals 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!