10160 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'm a reasonably bright person and my rating is ~1200 to 1300 I would guess (maybe that's being too generous) without any study or practice other than playing games and reading these forums occasionally. So my question is, for someone who is reasonably intelligent and decently good at chess naturally, what is a realistic expectation as to how good one can become without ever commiting serious time to studying?
I was in a similar situation about 4 years ago (my rating was in the 14-1500s in 2009, when I was 21, and I had only dabbled with chess in high school before this, really... with no knowledge of chess culture [and there is still much I do not know]) and I'm a national master now. If you can make studying and fun the same thing, you can be world champion [well magnus said something like this in a recent interview]. I know players up to 2500 who have made it to that level via mostly finding improvements on their own games and their OTB (over the board) experiences. It helps to access, know and play players who are slightly better than you as you improve. Also I found that playing through some famous games and reading stories of the more brilliant and entertaining players inspired my play also! My favorite tournament to play was the USATE in Parsippany, NJ (a team tournament [so go with your friends], cheap entry and festive atmosphere, lots of free prizes, plus some great players there, I got to play 3 time US Champ LarryC last year for instance and analyze with him. It's interesting to meet legends who have played legends with stories to tell... many masters have traveled internationally and learned much culturally too... I've heard Kasparov will be at USATE visiting/book signing or something next year...)
I'm not saying that improvement is easy, and I have put some work into it, but it was mostly play and study of my play! Playing masters helped me a lot to get there; I lost over 100 games to FM Dehmelt before I was finally able to play near his level.
Ok how did you reach NM? wow, if it took me 4 years to reach NM level i would be thrilled, it must partly be natural skills
I think it's very impressive, and it certainly may be a mix of work and natural talent, but remember to read carefully when chess players talk about their rating and progress. He didn't go from zero to NM in 4 years, he says he went from 1500 to NM in 4 years.So his "dabbled with chess in highschool" = a few years of non-tournament play + a few years of playing in tournaments at the end of which he was a stronger player then than you are now, so your analogous 4 year count doesn't even start yet (first play a few years and get to 1500).And if going to 3 tournaments a year is dabbling, then I've barely even been dabbling In the future expect a post from me:"Yeah I didn't really start playing chess until 2014, and after that it only took 1 year to get to [insert absurdly high 1 year rating here].
I've never stuided anything besides chess videos on youtube, some tactics and played lots of games. I started playing when I was 22, that was 4 years ago. I havent improved in the last year, possibly because I dont study, possibly because I've reached my limit
What seems to be most chess players:
"Other than [books, videos, magazines, and/or websites] I never studied. And [discounting tournaments I went to] I didn't play any serious games. And mostly I really only [other than clubs I attended weekly] played online. In fact even online I [other than the long games] never really played serious games, only 1/0 games.And other than [strong players and friends I analyzed with] I never REALLY had a coach or mentor of any kind.Considering how I've [pretty much] never studied, played a serous game, analyzed my games, or been coached I think my rating is very good! And discounting all those years I did all or some of those things it only took me a very short time too."
The only way to play chess without studying or practice is to play your very first game of chess with no previous knowledge of it. So I'd guess that'd be a rating of 300 max.
Nobody has every won their first 50 games.
So at some time you lost. When you lost you had to figure why you lost. So bla bla bla you seriously studied. Now if your played you and do not give me no friend played you in a game ok a family member then cut the cheese. Sure they pulled out all those quick mates and traps beginners do not know. And naturally they did not tell you how to stop it at first. Bla bla bla you studied seriously not to have it happen again.
If you know the name of openings, famaliar with GM's history, have a good understanding of mobility of pieces, tactics and etc then you seriously studied the game of chess to be good at it.
This thread reminds me of "I want to be an M.D. in one year" but it has a slightly different slant, so:
Hey when they have an interface directly with the brain ....
..... well it be possible to be instantly a GM.
Here's the answer:
Well for me I studied up until I was about 1650 USCF. Then I didn't study or studied very little, and in about 1.5 years, Tada! I'm 1932 USCF now. 😉
INFINITY AND BEYOND!!!
Yeah, but you are an exception...a child prodigy?
And, 11? Isn't 12 the lower age limit here?
Also, you did study. Then, later you didn't study but maybe you did but it was very little? Sounds to me that you did study but are just being modest about it.
Well nobody cares how old you are here. You can be 5 years old and lie and get in :-) I am 11 though.
Also, from 1650 to 1932, I have probably done maybe 60-80 chess puzzles. In 1.5 years. That's not good :-)
11 and 1932 USCF?
Yeah. Its true. Search up Derek Zhang on USCF Ratings.
I believe you, just impressed.
Losing in Chess gives more pain than losing in any other sport.
by Steve212000 3 minutes ago
is there a win here?
by ophirsi 6 minutes ago
When / how was chess first "solved" by a software program?
by ChessBloodBathHouse 6 minutes ago
4/21/2014 - One And Done
by pbazan 12 minutes ago
What would be the average rating for a 13 year old
by aman_makhija 12 minutes ago
LOL chess games
by salatoy 14 minutes ago
Why did you choose the username you have?
by AlCzervik 15 minutes ago
by Ronald_Aprianto 15 minutes ago
Mass of dumb begineers
by kleelof 16 minutes ago
black...BLACK...I am given black to play constantly
by salatoy 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!