15060 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Again, computers don't really play chess. They don't feel pressure and have never played for the world championship. Let's stick to humans.
Morphy revolutionized chess. He was absolutely brilliant and was, for many years, the best player on the planet. But chess, like all sports, progresses. Steinitz improved over time and eventually eclipsed Morphy.
No player before Capa achieved +2700 performances. Morphy's best was measured at ~2350. That's an incredible achievement considering the state of chess at the time. Steinitz was slightly but measurably better than Morphy's best.
I'm sure we've all seen players who seem to win every game brilliantly, but whose ratings are lower than their less flashy competition. Without ratings, it's easy to think the brilliant player must be better. We now know a different truth.
Morphy was certainly in the 2700's at age 21. The prime age for a person's chess playing on average is in his or her late 30's. (This does say a lot for Carlsen.)
Morphy had no one to challenge him in his day, and probably got a bit lax at times.
Very doubtful about that rating. Closer to 2200 is really his strength.
Yes Morphy hasn't played the best chess, my opinion he was one of the most if not the most talented to play the game though.
He was seminal and the best of his day.Yet some people need more than reality and thus create mythos.But chess is about information, and today's players have more and are significantly better because of it.
This is a non sensical question, as there is no correct answer. Where is the beginning of a circle ? Once you are way up there - you are way up there, full stop.
Actually, Nobby, the answer to the best chess player of all time can be answered objectively. Kenneth Regan has shown that ratings accurately reflect objective skill, and that there is no rating inflation. In terms of pure quality of play, without regard to contributions to the game or anything else, here's the list of the top 14 players of all time, in order:
Why do you hate dictionaries?
Maybe he had a 'scope on it.
Actually, Nobby, the answer to the best chess player of all time can be answered objectively.
You're misinterpreting, they actually mean to imply that the answer is Nezhmetdinov, because he was a good propagandist and served The Red Army well.
BigPoison has found a grammatical mistake in one of my posts for the first time in over a year.
Congratulations to BigPoison!
I'm flattered that of all the people on this site who make grammatical errors, BP loves me the most! Why else would he so gleefully pounce on my gramatical errors.
My mistake was a grammatical one where I deleted part of a sentence before I posted my comment. I used the correct word.
The elo system is an objective (yes, objective) measure of playing strength. To find the best player ever, just take a look at who has the highest FIDE rating of all time. That list is the one I posted:
Vishy Anand claims to be able to see 70 moves ahead...
by oxoxvc a few minutes ago
If chess players are so smart why they are not millionaires/billionaires?
by johnmusacha a few minutes ago
Why Doesn't Chess.com Stop All The Nonsense?
by alanzhang3434 a few minutes ago
I need an opening against 1. e4
by ViktorHNielsen 4 minutes ago
Complaint about my comments on Tactical Trainer
by DandyDanD 4 minutes ago
7/23/2014 - Kasparov - Vilaisarn (simul) 2008
by jsmwnyc 5 minutes ago
Looking for Tournament Chess Set (Portable)
by RoryNemo 6 minutes ago
Ratings Are Deceiving
by kasirohan 7 minutes ago
Sicilian: Positional Lines
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 9 minutes ago
Do You Insist ?
by Reb 10 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!