16241 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Bobby Fischer, end of argument.
Bobby Fischer only managed to defeated Spassky for the first time in 1972 (the same year he quit), and he never proved that he could stand a chance against Karpov. He cowered and left the chess world before he could fully develop. Botvinnik, on the other hand, proved his dominance for four decades.
You don't know what you are talking about. Fischer was not interested in continueing chess. He was about to stop playing against spasski too if his demands were not met. Fischer played all the greatest players at his time, and beat all of them. No one stood a chance, and he got bored, i guess.
Well that's a bit untrue, though.I'm not dissing Fischer, as I think he was one of the best players, but still, the smoke's bigger than the fire.First of all, Tal beat him, several times, and secondly, he didn't really have that much of an opposition.Let's face it, Spassky wasn't that much of a challenge for him; he was a rather mediocre world champion, and never near to those that came before and after him.I wonder what would have happened if Fischer played someone like Alekhine or Capa.
Spassky would take care of Euwe, Alekhine, or Capablanca quite handily. Chess progressed a lot since their day and Botvinnik's school greatly advanced chess understanding.
No real competition? Fischer's competition consisted of Larsen, Geller, Petrosian, Korchnoi, Botvinnik, Gligoric, Benko, Reuben Fine, Smyslov, Reshevsky, and Najdorf just to name a few.
As for best of all time Carlsen, his peak rating and the quality of current top level competition is quite telling. And he's still not done improving.
@SmyslovFan, it's probably more useful to compare ratings over a span of time, not just the peak rating. Calling Radjabov the 8th best player of all time is pretty ridiculous.
I would have to disagree from a purely objective (as opposed to relative to one's peers) standpoint. Radjabov, if he were to travel back in time and face Capablanca or even Spassky during their primes, he would convincingly defeat them in a set match. We speak of players such as Alekhine and Capablanca being great, and they were, but how do you think Alekhine would fare against Grischuk's infamous Hedgehog or Ruy Lopez technique! Modern players simply have too many advantages and some math was done with comparing computer evaluations of past players’ moves compared to today.
In Warriors of the Mind Raymond Keane puts Tigran Petrosian well below Lasker and Capablanca (not to mention that Fischer's real life peak was well above 2690) so I don't put any stock in that system.
Sums it up nicely.
Radjabov wouldn't "convincingly beat Capablanca in a match".
As great as Capa was, he was not able to adjust to the Dynamic chess of the Soviet School. There's a reason that Botvinnik-Capa at AVRO 1938 is considered one of the greatest and most important games of all time.
We saw that Capa, for all his brilliance, had a very difficult time when faced with the likes of Alekhine and Botvinnik. He would have no clue how to handle the wild and ultra-precise lines that today's players use every day.
Kasparov wrote a book showing how chess was revolutionized after Fischer. We're living in the golden age of chess where at least 10 of the top 15 players of all time are still active!
Capablanca was 50 when AVRO took place. He would be dead 4 years later because of health problems.
What excuse do you have for Capa's failure in 1927?
"Radjabov wouldn't "convincingly beat Capablanca in a match""
If Alekhine could do it in the 1920s it wouldn't be surprising if top players of the 2010s could do it.
Same as Alekhine's in 1935. They both liked to party a little too much.
Of all time? Probably someone in the future.
What about taking away victories of closed accounts
by DavidReti a few minutes ago
winning on time....ethical. ..??
by Jimmykay 5 minutes ago
7/30/2014 - Mate in 4
by pbazan 7 minutes ago
this is very nice opening
by toadog7 14 minutes ago
by Here_Is_Plenty 14 minutes ago
by Samsch 19 minutes ago
Coaching Beginners to 1400
by Supreme_Commander_FS 22 minutes ago
by jbell35 26 minutes ago
7/29/2014 - Full House
by bangalore2 30 minutes ago
Should I feel accomplishment for winning this?
by SJFG 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!