Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

who is the best chess player of all time?


  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #301

    SilentKnighte5

    Radjabov wouldn't "convincingly beat Capablanca in a match".

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #302

    SmyslovFan

    As great as Capa was, he was not able to adjust to the Dynamic chess of the Soviet School. There's a reason that Botvinnik-Capa at AVRO 1938 is considered one of the greatest and most important games of all time.

    We saw that Capa, for all his brilliance, had a very difficult time when faced with the likes of Alekhine and Botvinnik. He would have no clue how to handle the wild and ultra-precise lines that today's players use every day.

    Kasparov wrote a book showing how chess was revolutionized after Fischer. We're living in the golden age of chess where at least 10 of the top 15 players of all time are still active!

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #303

    SilentKnighte5

    Capablanca was 50 when AVRO took place.  He would be dead 4 years later because of health problems.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #304

    SmyslovFan

    What excuse do you have for Capa's failure in 1927?

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #305

    fabelhaft

    "Radjabov wouldn't "convincingly beat Capablanca in a match""

    If Alekhine could do it in the 1920s it wouldn't be surprising if top players of the 2010s could do it.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #306

    SilentKnighte5

    SmyslovFan wrote:

    What excuse do you have for Capa's failure in 1927?

    Same as Alekhine's in 1935.  They both liked to party a little too much.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #307

    Steve212000

    Of all time? Probably someone in the future.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #308

    varelse1

    SilentKnighte5 wrote:
    SmyslovFan wrote:

    What excuse do you have for Capa's failure in 1927?

    Same as Alekhine's in 1935.  They both liked to party a little too much.

    Checkmate!Tongue Out

  • 3 weeks ago · Quote · #309

    Luke_Snyder

    Please one more utterance obout Morphy.

    He played before there were chess clocks. He used roughly one hour per game to 8 hours for his opponent. A miracle he scored so well as he must have fought boredom.

    His strongest opponent was probably Anderssen. He scored a 4 to 1 win ratio. Compare to Steinitz, who only had an even ratio against Anderssen.

    Fischer (and Anderssen in his day) said he was the best player to have played- Fischer said this in 1964 and in 1970.

    Not saying he was the best, just one in the mix. As Euwe said of him, we will never know for sure but he has to be considered.  

    That's likely the answer to the question- we may never know. 

  • 3 weeks ago · Quote · #310

    SmyslovFan

    Please, quote Fischer accurately. He said Morphy was the greatest chess genius. He did not claim that Morphy was the best player ever. Fischer knew better than just about anyone that genius alone isn't enough to be the best player in the world.

  • 3 weeks ago · Quote · #311

    blueemu

    SmyslovFan wrote:

    Please, quote Fischer accurately. He said Morphy was the greatest chess genius. He did not claim that Morphy was the best player ever. Fischer knew better than just about anyone that genius alone isn't enough to be the best player in the world.

    Good point, well made.

  • 3 weeks ago · Quote · #312

    Luke_Snyder

    Fischer also said  "Genius. It's a word. What does it really mean? If I win I'm a genius. If I don't, I'm not."  

    So, genius=wins games.

    And greatest genius= greatest at winning. 

    But enough- we can't be certain what he meant. Forget it! Vulcan mind meld!



  • 32 hours ago · Quote · #313

    sirrichardburton

    Its too bad Pillsbury died at a fairly young age. His tournament victory at Hastings was one of the biggest shockers in all of chess history. It would have been great if he had had a world championship match but such is life. A Fischer-Karpov match also would had been nice.......I always prefer the topic of who is your favorite rather than who is the "best". There are so many different ways to evaluate world champions that is impossible to come to a clear answer.

  • 32 hours ago · Quote · #314

    SmyslovFan

    Pillsbury definitely had talent. We'll never know how good he could have been. He really did have the good excuse that he partied too much.

  • 32 hours ago · Quote · #315

    rawhide84

    FISCHER

  • 6 hours ago · Quote · #316

    Luke_Snyder

    [COMMENT DELETED]

Back to Top

Post your reply: