10755 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What excuse do you have for Capa's failure in 1927?
Same as Alekhine's in 1935. They both liked to party a little too much.
Please one more utterance obout Morphy.
He played before there were chess clocks. He used roughly one hour per game to 8 hours for his opponent. A miracle he scored so well as he must have fought boredom.
His strongest opponent was probably Anderssen. He scored a 4 to 1 win ratio. Compare to Steinitz, who only had an even ratio against Anderssen.
Fischer (and Anderssen in his day) said he was the best player to have played- Fischer said this in 1964 and in 1970.
Not saying he was the best, just one in the mix. As Euwe said of him, we will never know for sure but he has to be considered.
That's likely the answer to the question- we may never know.
Please, quote Fischer accurately. He said Morphy was the greatest chess genius. He did not claim that Morphy was the best player ever. Fischer knew better than just about anyone that genius alone isn't enough to be the best player in the world.
Good point, well made.
Fischer also said "Genius. It's a word. What does it really mean? If I win I'm a genius. If I don't, I'm not."
So, genius=wins games.
And greatest genius= greatest at winning.
But enough- we can't be certain what he meant. Forget it! Vulcan mind meld!
Its too bad Pillsbury died at a fairly young age. His tournament victory at Hastings was one of the biggest shockers in all of chess history. It would have been great if he had had a world championship match but such is life. A Fischer-Karpov match also would had been nice.......I always prefer the topic of who is your favorite rather than who is the "best". There are so many different ways to evaluate world champions that is impossible to come to a clear answer.
Pillsbury definitely had talent. We'll never know how good he could have been. He really did have the good excuse that he partied too much.
Tarrasch is the strongest chess player who ever lived.
Standard Ratings Boost
by Rockazb 4 minutes ago
Too many games
by AaronGo 6 minutes ago
10/21/2014 - Mate in 3
by jsmwnyc 7 minutes ago
How do normal people become 2100 players
by shell_knight 9 minutes ago
best game ever
by MainlineNovelty 36 minutes ago
huge rating jump
by shell_knight 41 minutes ago
What strange chess rules can you think up?
by aman_makhija 44 minutes ago
My Rating Didn't Change?
by awesomechess1729 50 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by but 50 minutes ago
Windows Phone 8 Beta Testers Needed
by sergrnz 53 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!