18761 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Yes, the stats can be found at chessgames.com, and even if they can be a bit wrong sometimes they give a hunch about how strong Kasparov was, here are Kramnik's results against the three players Kasparov scored +32 -0 =37 against, it ends up with +31 -20 =111. Quite good if not for the comparison with Kasparov's scores:
Classical games: Vladimir Kramnik beat Alexey Shirov 15 to 11, with 27 draws.
Classical games: Vladimir Kramnik beat Peter Leko 10 to 6, with 52 draws.
Classical games: Vladimir Kramnik beat Boris Gelfand 6 to 3, with 32 draws.
Guys what opening do u expect in tomorrow's game? I am rooting for 1.d4 with The game being transposed into slav
I'm guessing 1.d4 and a Queen's Indian.
And I guess that Anand will win the match 6.5-4.5. First five-six draws and then an Anand win in game six or seven followed by Gelfand trying too hard to win a game towards the end of the match and losing again in game ten or eleven.
I'd like to see slav tomorrow, or QGDAnyone know if Anand plays that?
according to this if d4 we are likely to see a queen's indian or semi slav
There's a high probability that gelfand may opt for 1.e4 tomorrow. Although time'll only tell the truth
christiansoldier thnx 4 d recap of the game
Strange that Anand went for the non critical 8.Bb5+ against the Gruenfeld, he must have expected Gelfand to play it at some point. If thats really all he has in the exchange variation Gelfand can draw every game in that line.
What does a statement like this even mean? We're not talking about your Uncle Ernie. We're talking about the world champion. He knows more about the Exchange Grunfeld than most people know about anything.
Just wondering how Magnus is not the one playing for the Championship?
Well you actually have to turn up for the qualification phase in order to play in the final
What's his reason for not showing up? He is ranked world #1 and is expected to be World Champion sometime. What is he waiting for?
Quite enjoyed today's match & Gelfand will be pleased. Like the ''underdog'' hence am rooting for him though do agree on a good day Anand is better-player. The slight question mark is Anand has not been playing his best for a while now & will he come good when it counts ?
There should be little discussion of Carlsen here. This match is between Gelfand & Anand by right & Carlsen irrelevant in this title-fight. His time is still to come.
Not purely that. I do admire Gelfand's play & he is best in the world at certain systems/openings. Anand has more flair & greater repertoire.
Also Anand has perfect temperament to be champion & could remain there for some time as did Kasparov.
Is the time control in this match the FIDE standard 40/90m+30s, G/30m+30s?
Clear-information here :
Well todays game started such standard QG stuff by Anand yet by accepting doubled-pawns on c-file was very impressed by Gelfands lines.
Ok. Thanks. But, what is the significance of the 'live rating list"?
FIDE updates their ranking list only 6 times a year - whereas the Live rankings (not endorsed by FIDE) update after each rated game a player completes.
Currently (according to 2700chess.com), after the draw in game 1, Anand is ranked #4 in the world and Gelfand is #21.
Thanks a lot, buddy.
He seems more preoccupied with fashion shoots and bringing up excuses for not playing in qualification phases. FIDE changed some rules and he threw a hissy fit. He clearly had a point... but he thought that point was more important than becoming world champion. Or maybe he only wants to play a WC match when he is slightly more experienced and stronger.
He is the best, but he needs to show it.
Is Magnus Carlsen the best? Why? Because he is world no: 1? If that is the case, why world no:2 or no:3 is not the challenger, but world no: 20?
(I hope world no:2 & no: 3 turned up for the qualification matches )
is it theoretically possible to boost ELO rating by 1000 point in 1 year?
by Equiv a few minutes ago
My wins against NM!!
by SmyslovFan a few minutes ago
1/31/2015 - Ryklis-Ivasyuk, USSR 1982
by Conflagration_Planet 7 minutes ago
Fischer-Kasparov Novel now out on Amazon
by KTZ1 11 minutes ago
Another cheater thread
by hapless_fool 25 minutes ago
Using a program in 1 min chess??
by HilarioFJunior 27 minutes ago
is ALIVE the best female chessplayer???
by marcosite 27 minutes ago
Black to win on material ( PZ1634 )
by geminicricket 35 minutes ago
Two Potentially Promising Books
by SilentKnighte5 37 minutes ago
by wanmokewan 45 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!