Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 7 months ago

    chessmasters2004

    This was rated, right?

    So wouldn't you get more rating if you just played for a win, declined the draw, and beat him?

    great game anyway thx

  • 2 years ago

    NM SasaK

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago

    TonyH

    @ receipt at this level if you see an obvious move that loses material and a player doesnt capture it look for a few minutes on a board to see if you can find the reason. In this case there is a very good reason since after Rac1 the queen moves (or gets captured) and Rxc8 wins material. at the master level game is over.

  • 3 years ago

    receipt1

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago

    ddp17

    One sees such games, and, what can one say, but, "Shankland!"

  • 3 years ago

    jflores33

    Fantastic preparation (Qb3) and good explanations, great game!  You make it seem easy to outplay a super GM which it is not!

  • 3 years ago

    elindauer

    Great description, you seemed to really highlight the pros and cons of each move in the opening.  It was particularly instructive to hear you explain your thought process for moves 14-16 as you described the interplay between black's Ne5 / Rb8 and white's plan to play Nd2-c4.  Very nice.

     

    Congratulations on the amazing accomplishment.

  • 3 years ago

    lbtr74aao

  • 3 years ago

    jayantbhat

    very nice

  • 3 years ago

    Lukacsimi

    I'm so glad Leko of Hungary is not lost but taken apart on both sides of the room is commendable.
    You were big:) Congrats

  • 3 years ago

    kalle99

    I dont agree Sam with your reasoning. You should have gone after him as a blood thirsty tiger.

  • 3 years ago

    Templetonkaka

    greaet

Back to Top

Post your reply: