I think this GM made an amazing point. He said it maybe easy for the computer to play but not for a human!
Where on earth is the third part to this series? (I just looked everywhere)
thx for vid
Are we ever getting part 3?
[NO COMMENTS]
good video
well done
wow. thanks for the video
Thank you, Sam.
This is more like it. A couple of very good points here: (1) computers can't invent opening theory for you, because their ability to assess long-term positional issues is limited and (2) the computer's best move isn't necessarily a human's best move if the winning line is too difficult for a human player to calculate.
Fantastic. I was killing 2 birds with one stone here. A little bit about a opening I have been trying to get into and what the proper way to use a computer is. I look forward to the next segment
What do you create these tutorials in? Program?
LOVE IT HOW DO I SIGN UP
heard about u r recent tourney ray is good
well anyone who's seen a terminator movie knows that.. :p
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
Diamond Members get unlimited access to the entire Video Lessons Library! Upgrade your account today - you are 100% covered by a no-questions-asked 30 day money-back guarantee!
by GM Sam Shankland
In the second part (of three) in his series on the role of computers in studying chess, IM Shankland shows two very sharp and intense games from his recent tournament practice, explaining on which moves, the judgment of the computer is useful for comparison and on which moves it is not helpful to consult. The games themselves are quite thrilling!
