A Slight Advantage in the Queenless Middlegame

  • GM BryanSmith
  • | Aug 1, 2013

A slight advantage doesn't mean you're necessarily going to win the game. It just means that your opponent has the more difficult problems to solve, and his mistakes will probably hurt his position more than yours will. In a queenless middlegame, prosecuting such a small advantage requires that one presents one's opponent with difficult choices - especially with regards to transposing into various pure endings. As the game goes on, simplification happens naturally, and the defender needs to be able to determine which kind of simplifications lead to the safe haven of the draw, and which lead to further trouble.

A typical example is the following, my game against GM Gata Kamsky from 2010:

Our main game features world champion Viswanathan Anand, against GM Jon Ludvig Hammer. At the point the queenless middlegame began, the game was basically equal. However, Anand was slowly able to gain a slight advantage. As simplification carried the game forward to a minor piece ending, White's advantage remained slight - consisting of a better bishop and some space advantage on the queenside. But with the battle restricted to only one side of the board, White's chances of winning still did not seem high.

Anand-Hammer in a later game

Finally, perhaps due to time pressure, Hammer misevaluated the exchange of a further pair of minor pieces - a seemingly surprising exchange of the white knight for the black bishop, leaving Black with apparently a total blockade, as well as vulnerable white pawns on the kingside should White "try anything". But Anand had seen that the black knight would end up fatally restricted. Unfortunately a double blunder (perhaps also due to the rapid pace of the game) marred the finish.



  • 3 years ago


    Great games and very instructive!Thanks.

  • 3 years ago


    Very instructive, Thank you.

  • 3 years ago


    Muy buen artículo, necesitamos más...

    Really good article, we need more...

  • 3 years ago


    Brilliant game - please show more queenless middlegame.Cool

  • 3 years ago


    Didn't help me at all.I know everything --'

  • 3 years ago


    thanks for nice article.

  • 3 years ago


    today I learnt.

  • 3 years ago


    Nice article. I really liked the annotations, especially in the Anand-Hammer game.

  • 3 years ago


    Great article

  • 3 years ago


    Some of the most clear and accessible annotations I've read.

  • 3 years ago


    great article! thnx www.diegoriedemann.cl

  • 3 years ago


    ur article is simple and points out very important things.. ur notes inside the game after moves is very very useful and better than writing notes outside the game itself. thank u

  • 3 years ago


    Really interesting and useful article, thanks

  • 3 years ago


    thank you IM Smith,a very usefulGM knowledge 

  • 3 years ago


    Thank you IM smith. I learned many things from this article. Smile

Back to Top

Post your reply: