Hedgehog, Bishop and Knight..

Hedgehog, Bishop and Knight..

energia
WIM energia
Jul 31, 2009, 12:00 AM |
19 | Middlegame

I would like to talk about a particular situation, which usually happens out of the Hedgehog opening. Black has a6, b6, d6 and e6 pawn structure and white tries to attack the d6 pawn with a bishop maneuver to f4, while his major pieces are already doubled on the d-file. Black can put his knight on e5 to block the bishop’s attack on the d6 square. In this case one should evaluate what would happen if white traded his bishop for the knight. One advantage of such a trade is doubled pawns on the e-file for black. As we will see in the following examples, creating doubled pawns for the opponent does not always give advantage, one has to take into account more factors. These are: piece placement after the exchange, whether it is possible for the opponent to take over the center due to pawns e6, e5, and who would be faster in activating their pawn majorities. We will address some of these issues as we will look through the examples.

At the board a typical Hedgehog position is defined by black pawns lined up on the 6th rank. White has a space advantage but black’s position is very solid because the row of pawns on the 6th rank guard all the important squares. D6 is the main weakness in black’s position and with his last move Ne5 black defended the pawn. Ne5 is very well placed: besides protecting d6 it attacks the weakness on c4. White decides to trade his bishop for the knight. The downsides of this decision are the loss of the black-squared bishop, the loss of control of d4 and f4. There are advantages to it: open d file, pawn majority on the queen side and most importantly black’s two bishops cannot get into the game since the e4 and e5 pawns block them. Black has to play by using the d4 square and pawn majority on the kingside but in the given situation it is hard to achieve because his pieces are not ready for this task.




This is a similar position to the above. Since black has his bishops on b7 and c7 the exchange on e5 is especially effective. In this game black found a spectacular defensive idea. It was based on using the d4 square as an outpost.


In the following game white did not play e4. But the main difference of course is the absence of light-squared bishops, meaning there would be no passive Bb7. Also if white trades on e5 here Be7 would be working- attacking the b4-pawn. Nb7 can get to the game through the d6 square. C4 is weak and white’s king can get in trouble.


Which side would favor the exchange on e5? White would get the d-file but lose control of the dark squares and this especially can be felt on the queenside. White would have an option of creating isolated doubled pawns e6, e5 which should favor him in the endgame. On the other hand, exchanging on e5 will open the diagonal for Bf8, which can get transferred to c5-d4.




Overall, taking the knight on e5 with the bishop in the Hedgehog structures is a big commitment. Usually, it works well when both black both bishops are on the queenside and hitting e5 and e4 pawns. It favors black to have a bishop on e7 if white decides to trade the knight on e5. As can be seen from example two, black can effectively use the central squares that are granted to him because of the doubled e6, e5 pawns. As the last example shows, opening up the game favors the side that is better developed.

More from WIM energia
A Farewell!

A Farewell!

Positional Methods From Carlsen's Play, The End

Positional Methods From Carlsen's Play, The End