Openings for Tactical Players: Queen's Gambit Accepted
This is the eternal question of chess players who like sharp positions: "How do I reasonably achieve sharp play with Black vs 1.d4?" Sure you can play the King's Indian Defense or the Gruenfeld Defense, but then you will have to know an ocean of opening variations. Besides, if you are unlucky enough to follow your opponent's opening preparation, then the game can end before it really started. One solution to the problem is to play the Queen's Gambit Accepted (QGA). I know what you think: the QGA leads to dry, boring positions. Not necessarily! If you play creative chess, you can get a sharp position in any opening. Here we can try to challenge the well-known assessment that the Queen's Gambit is not a real gambit since in most of the variations Black cannot keep his extra pawn. What if after White's most popular move, 3. Nf3, we play 3...c6? One of the benefits of this move is a nasty trap that claims even GM victims. Judge for yourself:
Here are the games where GMs playing White fell for this trap: Farago (2515)- Blumberg, Budapest, 1994 ; Lesiege (2521)- Perez, Habana,1999; Kunte (2535)- Varga, Beijing, 2008. Now you can really see that the trap is wicked!
So, do you play 3...c6!? just for the sake of this trap? Of course not! GM Victor Kupreichik was one of the most dangerous attacking players in the world in the 70s. Let's see how he treats this system.