Paul Morphy Screenplay

  • batgirl
  • | Jul 27, 2014

     As many fans of Paul Morphy know, there have been some historical fiction written about him. 
On my Morphy website  I host two short stories about Morphy: 
"The Best American Chess Player" by Dan Heisman  and
"The Day Kasparov Played Morphy" by Mark Kislingbury.

     I've recently added an enjoyable and well-researched screenplay written by Jonathan Goldner called "An American Genius."

     Feel welcome to post any feedback or comments here.


  • 9 months ago


    Thanks for your comments on "An American Genius" Now I am in the process of seeking co-producers and financing.

  • 12 months ago


    Thanks for reading it. Mr. Goldner did a wonderful bit of storytelling.

  • 12 months ago


    I just read "American Genius". It brought Morphy alive in a special way!!. I really enjoyed it!! 

  • 21 months ago


    morphy all the way Batgirl

  • 23 months ago


    I'm convinced Morphy, as was pointed out by Bobby Fischer, would beat everyone in modern day society as well given time to prep himself. He revolutionized the game.

  • 2 years ago


    The drama that rings truest for me in all of the Morphy tales is when the woman Morphy fell in love with rejected him for being "a mere chess player." At that time, as now, women who could command the attention of men of means and accomplishment would never be interested in chess players. When I was a naive youth, I thought this was unfair. By now, I realize it could hardly be otherwise. There was one exception of course: Capablanca. He lived in a unique time when his greatness on the world stage was universally acknowledged by civilized people, thereby making it possible for women to find him attractive.

  • 2 years ago


    We end in a ball-in-claw bathtub, but begin with beingets and coffee in the French Quarter.

  • 2 years ago


  • 2 years ago



  • 2 years ago


    Wow! One hundred and fifty pages. 

  • 2 years ago


    I am sure He would like the website, I'd bet on it!

  • 2 years ago


    @Kinn72 The reason Morphy didn't have the "game skills" Kasparov has is because chess hadn't evolved into the game it is today. Now people have acess to vast amounts of information regarding chess. Back then you had to practically come up with every idea by yourself, and for the record Morphy had far more natural talent than Kasparov!

  • 2 years ago


    I get the impression that Kasaparov didn't do so well when he underestimated his opponents. Deep Blue and Kramnik were underdogs were they not? Seems like his psychological warfare approach and overconfidence backfired.

  • 2 years ago


    I'm going to stay out of the pointless Kasparov vs Morphy debates :) and simply say that your website is a very valuable resource for those interested in chess history.

  • 2 years ago


    Morphy simply did not have the complete game skills that Kaparov does (posititional, tactical, endgame technique and opening knowledge).

  • 2 years ago


    kasparov is not a popular figure so the thought of him losing to morphy will make people happy - i enjoyed the detail put into it though

  • 2 years ago


    Can someone explain the Dan Heisman Story? Why did Morphy think 1.5/2 was good enough that day? Is Richard Franklin a well known player?

  • 2 years ago


    Actually, I believe that it would be quite the opposite. But that discussion can obviously never be settled, so let's not start it :P Kasparow wins on time, as he can still move pieces ;)

    Here is the idea for a short story. Kasparow dies, goes to Heaven (or choose any other afterworld) and learns that there is neverending tournament going on with Morphy, Capa, Alekhine, Fischer, etc. (insert all players considered GOAT).


    Edit: also, if anything, Kasparow could go into "safe mode" and start playing like Karpow or Petrosian. Do you think that Morphy's attacks would have any chance against "Iron Tigran"?

  • 2 years ago


  • 2 years ago


    yes very funny, tense, and vivid

Back to Top

Post your reply: