What is a proper moment to resign a game?

  • GM Gserper
  • | Feb 4, 2013

The subject of today's discussion might sound bizarre for most of you.  Indeed, all the chess coaches as well as books, magazines and Web sites teach you how to win your games and here we talk about when to resign? And yet, I think any experienced chess player knows what I am talking about. Just look at the following games :

"So what?", many of you would ask, "we see this kind of games every day in our chess club".  Indeed, this kind of 'endgame' where a lonely King fights practically the whole opponent's army is very common in the games played in parks or in your local Elementary School championship. But unfortunately all the games above were played in the Invitational US Championship (an adult Championship, mind you!) and the 'Player X' played all the games till a checkmate regardless of the position and the opponent's title. Some of you might call the last 15 - 20 moves in every game just a waste of time, but look at the situation from a different angle.  In all the games the opponents of the 'Player X' were Masters or International Masters, so playing out this kind of a position is like saying " I know that you have a ginormous material advantage , but are you good enough to checkmate me with an extra Queen?".  Some people probably can get insulted. 

Another extreme is when a chess player resigns too early. Sometimes he does it (or at least has the temptation to do it) for a reason. Look for example at my own game:

After Kramnik played 18.f4! (somehow I totally missed this simple move), I immediately realized what happened, but of course it was too late. With absolutely no counter play in the center or on the Queen's Side, Black can only helplessly wait till White annihilates him on the King's Side. Black's position is absolutely hopeless, but it was a Super Tournament (Karpov won it) and we played in a theatre packed with spectators. This explains my comment to this game published in the New in Chess magazine: "I should have resigned on the 18th move but was afraid that spectators wouldn't understand." By the way, I think professional chess players should never forget that sometimes we need to play even absolutely clear positions for other people.  Like in my last week's story I kept playing an absolutely drawn endgame for my wife (http://www.chess.com/article/view/should-your-girlfriendwife-play-chess), here I played a completely lost position for the chess fans who wanted to see the beautiful finish of Kramnik's positional masterpiece.  So I thought that I had the right to resign only when it was absolutely clear that my King was going to get checkmated very soon.

But sometimes chess players resign a position which is not lost.  Moreover, there are some examples where a game was resigned in a completely winning position!  Here is probably the most infamous and old example where Black resigned in a winning position:

So, what is a proper point to resign a game?  As always the answer is : "it depends!"  If you are a beginner, then you should never resign: Play till checkmate. First of all, your opponent, who is probably a beginner himself, may possibly stalemate you despite (or because of) his huge material advantage.  But even if he does beat you, you'll get another lesson how to convert a winning advantage in to a win. But if you are an advanced chess player, then playing every single game till your opponent actually checkmates you is not the strategy I would recommend. Use your common sense because only you can decide what is the exact point when there is absolutely no hope to save the game. Just ask yourself from time to time what is the chance my opponent doesn't win this position.  If the answer is "only if he has a heart attack right now," then probably it is time to quit.


  • 4 years ago


    I normally think of resigning after 1.e4 because I am so crap.

  • 4 years ago


    Since peterdubec made his comment, I let Hiarcs 13 chew on this a while.  It gives only .37 advantage to White after 18.f4.  It actually likes 17.f4 better than the way Kramnik played it.  The move of yours it really doesn't like is 19...Qc7.  It prefers 5 moves over that move!

    Not that I know anything, myself!

    Well, after even more chewing, it goes back and forth, but you are not evaluated down by more than .50 until after move 19, and you seem to have chances to play other ways on your 18th and 19th moves.  So...I would like to ask, is .49 (if you were to agree with that evaluation) bad enough to resign a GM game?



  • 4 years ago


    I LOVE TO   CHECKMATE PEOPLE , because they still think  they can win the game  It make me happy and laugh LaughingSealed


    Only to H3 I never resign ,  I like to learn and see how he checkmate me.

  • 4 years ago


    "Use your common sense because only you can decide what is the exact point when there is absolutely no hope to save the game."

    What's common sense, and why would it help me with something unique to me?

  • 4 years ago


    Grigory: I analyzed your game against Kramnik with a computer and it says after 18.f4! it's only "+0.28" and I guess that's still quite far from win even for a grandmaster. Or am I missing something?

  • 4 years ago


    I get annoyed on this site when I am playing move in 3-14 days and I am a queen up and the fella plays on... but it is his or her right.  I don't exercise my right that way usually...


    But in an OTB tourney or a "live" game?  I have never, in 15 years of competitive play, resigned a game, no matter who I played.  You want the win?   Then play till checkmate.  If you are too impatient, I would happily take a draw in a losing position to speed things up for you.  


    But seriously... it isn't disrespectful to expect people to actually play to mate.  Offering draws in lost positions, yea, but playing to mate?  No - that is called "chess".

  • 4 years ago


    Just because you have a lost position doesn't mean you should resign. Many lost positions take accurate technique and your opponent must prove he has the skills to put you away.

  • 4 years ago


    I have won/drawn several lost positions and I think too many resign too early. For example I bet some would resign this lost rook endgame I somehow managed to win once

  • 4 years ago


    It has been discussed many times. The idea about "resign when you are convinced you know technically how to win the game for the stronger side" is quite sound and elegant, no matter the strength of your opponent.

  • 4 years ago


    hope play together and you resign for my wife! Cool

  • 4 years ago


    Why should you resign a few moves before checkmate? Why not let the winner get the satisfaction of completing his combination? Why not let it be clear what the end of the game is? Why are so many chess games like novels with the last few pages missing? 

  • 4 years ago


    nice article

  • 4 years ago


    Tim Krabbé has an excellent compilation of resigns on winning positions at http://timkr.home.xs4all.nl/chess2/resigntxt.htm

  • 4 years ago


    @ "If you are a beginner, then you should never resign and play till a checkmate"

    I completely agree ... I was playing few games very bad ... lost 13 in a straight and this happend !


  • 4 years ago


    This is a less kown game that shows that it's never too late to resign.

  • 4 years ago



  • 4 years ago

    NM GargleBlaster

    Chucky shows us how it's done:

  • 4 years ago


    "Only if he has a heart attack right now" :)

  • 4 years ago


  • 4 years ago


    I know you have a huge material advantage, but are you good enough to checkmate me with an extra queen? HAHAH!!!

Back to Top

Post your reply: