Please provide PGN4 with moves, like:
[StartFen4 "R-0,0,0,0-1,1,1,1-1,1,1,1-0,0,0,0-0-14/14/14/7,yK,6/6,yQ,5,rB,gK/1,bB,12/14/bK,bR,12/14/14/14/14/14/6,rK,7"]
[Variant "Teams"]
[CurrentMove "2"]
1. Bm10-j7+ .. Bb9-d7
And please try to explain again, using different words. Try using Google Translate perhaps.
P.S.
Blue, not Bule.
not sure what u missing i will try again
right now blue pin the yellow queen with bishop consider these yellow queen moved some where then green turn .. red turn... he did nothing.. blue. bishop taken yellow king blue green won
same thing red did something these time
consider these yellow queen moved some where then green turn .. red turn... he block with bishop pin to stop blue eating yellow king and yellow queen is saved these is somewhat pin piece replacement
yellow taking green king so blue check or pin do not make any sense because blue turn never will come to eat yellow king
current rule is stopping yellow to move his queen
sorry for bad English
You should be staff, diduseethatcomeing, you are good about these things
You can compensate English level by showing us the moves. I showed the start:
1. Bm10-j7+ .. Bb9-d7
You can then show other move(s) and tell something simple like: Now it is allowed. Now it is not allowed. It should be allowed.
Maybe you offer something important, I don't know. But it is very difficult to understand, unfortunately, and you don't even try to use Google Translate. For example:
"do not make any scenes" is a nonsense. With Google Translate you can easily correct it to "do not make any sense". Show some respect to the readers, check you text before you post it. I believe that in any language "scenes" and "sense" have different meaning.
> You should be staff, diduseethatcomeing, you are good about these things
If you understood his idea, be so kind, explain it.
you wan't any pinned piece to be free to move unless the "pinner" is next to move?
note that this will change the definition of checkmate too as checkmate = in check + no legal moves. in the 2nd picture say yellow was in checkmate. yellow now doen't care about pinned pieces and moves the queen to stop the checkmate, and the game goes on.
or you only want to allow getting out of pins to delivater mate to the player to your left?
before understanding not get confuse simply rule made in 2 player there only 2 turn so check mean next move his king is capture if he not move his king
mean these keep in mind very basic rule of chess. game is not over until king is capture or dead and 1st person doing that is wining. continue even after check or checkmate till the person capture 1st king
4pc here u r partner is there to block or break the checkmate supported until king is finally capture
2nd case is also similar
if blue rock check yellow red bishop can pin in between and stop yellow king to die and yellow can move freely
condensing these point for improvement in 4pc rule system
i think should allow player to play anything else even he is in check
Team variant?
If it is, then I do not see any wrong with the pin system..
If the yellow queen is checking the green king and if the red's bishop moved in front of the green king, it will stop the check.. and the game moves on
I don't understand..
Also it is yellow's turn. So he will have to move his king or use his queen to stop the check ( obviously no)
I think you got confused with the check here, didyouseethatcomeing.
The way it is currently implemented is that, if you are in check on your turn, you must deal with it instantly; that is the most logical way to implement it in my opinion, because if you changed it to your partner being able to deal with it for you, it would really obfuscate things. It would be a different implementation, but in my opinion, not better, but worse.
the problem with partner getting you out of checkmate is you don't have a move!
what's been discussed for ffa in some thread: an exception, meaning that the server checks all your moves and if you can, for example, get out of check by mating the player that is checking you, then that be legal. for teams i guess this is would mean yellow can capture the king despite being pinned in pic 2 (but not in ffa, unless a green bishop was pinning the q.).
i'm not sure how much this would change the game. for sure it's a ton of extra work for the server (checking the resulting position for every possible move on every move..)
> ... for sure it's a ton of extra work for the server (checking the resulting position for every possible move on every move..)
If we will allow players to ignore checks, the server load should not increase. Imagine that a yellow rook checks green, green ignores the check and makes some move (he can even move his king towards yellow rook checking his king 
). Then red makes some move. Now 2 things can happen:
1. Either blue will protect green king (capture yellow rook, place a piece between yellow rook and green king, or capture/checkmate yellow king).
2. Or yellow rook will capture green king.
The server load will increase only if the server will check/predict the moves. But we can leave it as it is.
>...the problem with partner getting you out of checkmate is you don't have a move!
if we apply game go on till capture the king (and player can ignore check) then in case of checkmate king will capture pieces that is check him and in next move supporting piece can capture back the king
and because of that one extra turn is added my partner can save me that also mean that u r checkmate should be stable (supporting pieces should not be any threaten ) these will change way of attack more like to be will go for stable attack i guess
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/411261659. skip to 2:20:15. One of the rare cases where we could've taken advantage of the current rules. As u can see i tried convincing my opponent to leave my king exposed because red had to respond to check before he can capture my king.
in recent few games i feel these that 4pc pin system is not correct
we all should understand basic rules of normal 2player chess is player have to move his king when he is in check or in next move his king dead so that y it is simply when there is cheak player got to move his king that simply rule is made
but in 4pc its not necessary these can be really confusing let me gave example
these is not real game based made up for example
its red to play
[StartFen4 "R-0,0,0,0-1,1,1,1-1,1,1,1-0,0,0,0-0-14/14/14/7,yK,6/6,yQ,5,rB,gK/1,bB,12/14/bK,bR,12/14/14/14/14/14/6,rK,7"]
[Variant "Teams"]
[CurrentMove "0"]
let assume 1st case
yellow to play
(green is pin) red bishop move then blue bishop pin then yellow queen take the green king (and red bishop can pin stop yellow check if green was alive yellow queen can stay alive with sacrifice partner pieces.)
2nd case is also similar
if blue rock check yellow red bishop can pin in between and stop yellow king to die and yellow can move freely
condensing these point for improvement in 4pc rule system
i think should allow player to play anything else even he is in check