[4PC Variant]: Custom Starting Position - Chess Forums - Page 67

IM BoxJellyfishChess

Jul 21, 2020

0

#1321

GMSimonChess wrote:

Name: The Heart of Chess.

[StartFen4 "R-0,1,0,1-1,0,1,0-1,0,1,0-0,0,0,0-0-3,X,X,X,X,X,X,X,X,3/3,X,X,X,X,X,X,X,X,3/3,X,X,X,X,X,X,X,X,3/X,X,X,yR,X,X,X,X,X,X,rR,X,X,X/X,X,1,yN,yP,X,X,X,X,rP,rN,1,X,X/X,2,yB,yP,1,X,X,1,rP,rB,2,X/yG,2,yK,yP,4,rP,rQ,2,rG/yG,2,yQ,yP,4,rP,rK,2,rG/X,2,yB,yP,4,rP,rB,2,X/X,X,1,yN,yP,4,rP,rN,1,X,X/X,X,X,yR,yP,4,rP,rR,X,X,X/3,X,yP,4,rP,X,3/3,X,X,4,X,X,3/3,X,X,X,2,X,X,X,3"]
[Variant "FFA"]
[RuleVariants "DeadKingWalking PointsForMate=40 EnPassant CaptureTheKing Prom=1"]
[CurrentMove "0"]

Rules still on top.

Can you put this plz

you need to provide example games; also your board is oriented wrong; the pawns cannot move at all because they face the wrong direction

Tails204

Jul 21, 2020

0

#1322

BoxJellyfishChess wrote:

Tails204 wrote:

Red Valley
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=4223179

I like the idea but there are a few issues currently:

1. blue and green have one rook blocked by a wall, yellow has both rooks not blocked by wall

2. yellow has rook on same file as the zombie's royal piece.

3. red's material is not distributed evenly

right now yellow has advantage. I suggest removing the hawk-walls, making red royal into a stronger piece (at least 5 pts piece, like for example a rook), and making red's pieces the same value on each rank (5 pt pieces like rooks bishops on 3rd rank, all amazons on 2nd, or whatever).

Ok, thank you for the advice!

Tails204

Jul 21, 2020

0

#1323

Red Valley 2.0.
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=4223550-0

Each king and red king piece has 9 lives.

6_K

Jul 21, 2020

0

#1324

grable написал:

gg7654 wrote:

Since you changed War for Throne II, you should also change War for Throne I by getting rid of corner pawns for that.

Shhh! It's the only tactically exciting one left. Don't give them the idea of changing that one too!

There is no problem because the king point at the center, so all attacks are equal. I will not change it.

TheChessDude991

Jul 21, 2020

0

#1325

Why did War for throne 2 have to be changed? The corner pawns provided a very tactically exciting opening with a nice element of opposite trust...

6_K

Jul 21, 2020

0

#1326

@MayimChayim

Defenders of the hill: 2 General is bad in that game.

6_K

Jul 21, 2020

0

#1327

TheChessDude991 написал:

Why did War for throne 2 have to be changed? The corner pawns provided a very tactically exciting opening with a nice element of opposite trust...

And why not use now other methods of attack? Most of top players think that it is bad to be attacked from the 1-st turn on this game.

Play-banned

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1328

6_K wrote:

@qfcbv @angelo_5113 @cuber4130 if you think that any CGA (maybe me too) taunting you, you (and other ones) can do such things:

Write new post about it;
Ask a @BabYagun or other admins (and give them link to the post);

This topic not about here, please don't spam it anymore. You can once post here a link to other topic if you want.

I did it. I messaged @spacebar about the issue

Play-banned

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1329

and being brave as well and I wasn't so scared

Play-banned

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1330

https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=4226705

R-0,0,0,0-0,0,0,0-0,0,0,0-0,0,0,0-0-{'royal''g1','a8','h14','n7'),'lives'10,10,10,10),'pawnsBaseRank':3}-
3,yP,yP,yP,X,yQ,X,yP,yP,3/
3,yP,yP,yP,yP,X,yP,yP,yP,3/
4,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,4/
bP,bP,3,yP,yP,yP,yP,3,gP,gP/
bP,bP,bP,8,gP,gP,gP/
X,bP,bP,bP,2,X,X,2,gP,gP,gP,gP/
bQ,X,bP,bP,1,X,2,X,1,gP,gP,gP,X/
X,bP,bP,bP,1,X,2,X,1,gP,gP,X,gQ/
bP,bP,bP,bP,2,X,X,2,gP,gP,gP,X/
bP,bP,bP,8,gP,gP,gP/
bP,bP,3,rP,rP,rP,rP,3,gP,gP/
4,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,4/
3,rP,rP,rP,X,rP,rP,rP,rP,3/
3,rP,rP,X,rQ,X,rP,rP,rP,3

Time Control: 1|15D or 1|5

Name: Queen War for throne

Rules: King of the hill, pawns promote to a queen on the 5th rank, pawns base rank: 3, 10-check

spacebar

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1331

https://youtu.be/CJx_0kltfaI?t=166

did someone really remove one of the most popular games?

I find the regime has become overly concerned with the term "unbalanced" and in their enthusiasm have thrown the baby out with the cradle in some cases.

6_K

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1332

@spacebar

you mean standart antichess? If yes, (huh) noone of us can delete it because it is base game.

IM BoxJellyfishChess

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1333

Tails204 wrote:

Red Valley 2.0.
https://www.chess.com/4-player-chess?g=4223550-0

Each king and red king piece has 9 lives.

This is listed now

IM BoxJellyfishChess

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1334

6_K wrote:

@spacebar

you mean standart antichess? If yes, (huh) noone of us can delete it because it is base game.

I think he means War For Throne II. Honestly, we need to have a re-vote, a lot of top war for throne players were not asked and some not so good players were.

IM BoxJellyfishChess

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1335

it was a test change not a permanent one

I think we will keep the original wft II and add the other as 2.1 or II.I (how do you do decimals in roman numerals?)

TheChessDude991

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1336

BoxJellyfishChess wrote:

it was a test change not a permanent one

I think we will keep the original wft II and add the other as 2.1 or II.I (how do you do decimals in roman numerals?)

YES!!!

Thank you!

The original War for throne 2 was really good and tactical

H1ghDude

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1337

BoxJellyfishChess wrote:

it was a test change not a permanent one

I think we will keep the original wft II and add the other as 2.1 or II.I (how do you do decimals in roman numerals?)

Ther's N0 decimal in Roman

IM BoxJellyfishChess

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1338

there will be a vote in the 4PC club forum

grable

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1339

spacebar wrote:

I find the regime has become overly concerned with the term "unbalanced" and in their enthusiasm have thrown the baby out with the cradle in some cases.

I think the idiom is "throw the baby out with the bathwater," but valued input nonetheless!

xxXHighDudeXxx wrote:

Ther's N0 decimal in Roman

The Romans didn't use decimals per se, but they did use fractional parts of a whole. For instance, 2.5 would be commonly represented as IIS, with the "S" standing for semi, equal to 6/12 or 1/2. Not that it matters a whole lot, but in the context of this discussion, I'd be all for listing the 20-pawn WFT as "War for Throne IIS," where you could interpret the "S" as "Semi," "Second," "Sad," "Sub-standard," "Shoddy," or whatever else fits.

IM BoxJellyfishChess

Jul 22, 2020

0

#1340

grable wrote:

spacebar wrote:

I find the regime has become overly concerned with the term "unbalanced" and in their enthusiasm have thrown the baby out with the cradle in some cases.

I think the idiom is "throw the baby out with the bathwater," but valued input nonetheless!

xxXHighDudeXxx wrote:

Ther's N0 decimal in Roman

The Romans didn't use decimals per se, but they did use fractional parts of a whole. For instance, 2.5 would be commonly represented as IIS, with the "S" standing for semi, equal to 6/12 or 1/2. Not that it matters a whole lot, but in the context of this discussion, I'd be all for listing the 20-pawn WFT as "War for Throne IIS," where you could interpret the "S" as "Semi," "Second," "Sad," "Sub-standard," "Shoddy," or whatever else fits.

lol nice

everyone vote here https://www.chess.com/clubs/forum/view/war-for-throne-ii?page=1&newCommentCount=1#last_comment

requirements to vote: 1700+ FFA Variant (OR 1800+ FFA Variant Bullet, OR 2000+ hyperbullet,), with 10+ war for throne games in any rating in which you have the required rating