But with so many conflicts, how can we unite easily?It seems we are, for the most part, multi-party.
A Perfect Commune?
Sort:
Agree 
NotNerdyN3rd wrote:
This forum means no disrespect, as I have made it with the consent of other Comrads.
Communism represents everyone being equal, everyone being happy. And although the idea is good, there is one major problem; it relies on an assumption. We must assume everyone uses there power and equality wisely. The problem is, there may be some who aren't reliable enough.
In a traditional government, a select few are leaders. But in a Commune, everyone is equal. My idea is that people should prove their reliability. It should not be predecideded based on popularity or anything similar. Instead, based on contributions.
I agree
or else this place will look like anarchy. THAT WILL NOT BE NICE
Yes I have been there
NotNerdyN3rd 写道:
This forum means no disrespect, as I have made it with the consent of other Comrads.
Communism represents everyone being equal, everyone being happy. And although the idea is good, there is one major problem; it relies on an assumption. We must assume everyone uses there power and equality wisely. The problem is, there may be some who aren't reliable enough.
In a traditional government, a select few are leaders. But in a Commune, everyone is equal. My idea is that people should prove their reliability. It should not be predecideded based on popularity or anything similar. Instead, based on contributions.
I had this idea once as well (and it was partially reality in the eastern block), but allowing power to be taken by contribution would mean the few pay the majority and decide the majority. If you knew that your vote needs money/labour, noone except for the ones assured of their victory would even contribute.
I think just for everyone as coordinator if anyone wants to promote then have to be on forum see if everyone agrees and why and Super Admin same
But @Comrade_Trotsky won't let me do that
Feb 23, 2025
0
#10
teachmethoroughly wrote:
NotNerdyN3rd 写道:
This forum means no disrespect, as I have made it with the consent of other Comrads.
Communism represents everyone being equal, everyone being happy. And although the idea is good, there is one major problem; it relies on an assumption. We must assume everyone uses there power and equality wisely. The problem is, there may be some who aren't reliable enough.
In a traditional government, a select few are leaders. But in a Commune, everyone is equal. My idea is that people should prove their reliability. It should not be predecideded based on popularity or anything similar. Instead, based on contributions.
I had this idea once as well (and it was partially reality in the eastern block), but allowing power to be taken by contribution would mean the few pay the majority and decide the majority. If you knew that your vote needs money/labour, noone except for the ones assured of their victory would even contribute.
I understand your viewpoint. But once they show themselves responsible, they will be assured equality. It is all in their hands, and the amount that they have to prove themselves responsible shouldn't be too much. It shall be that everyone can fulfil their responsibilities, prove themselves, and show themselves not to be a menace to the Commune. Soon, everybody will have equal power, just as intended, everyone but those who are bad comrades.
Glad to see some positive discussion.
Yes
Put all members down to Admin or Coordinator, only select members elected by congress to be Super Admin, and members will be criminals who still love Communism ₷
This forum means no disrespect, as I have made it with the consent of other Comrads.
Communism represents everyone being equal, everyone being happy. And although the idea is good, there is one major problem; it relies on an assumption. We must assume everyone uses there power and equality wisely. The problem is, there may be some who aren't reliable enough.
In a traditional government, a select few are leaders. But in a Commune, everyone is equal. My idea is that people should prove their reliability. It should not be predecideded based on popularity or anything similar. Instead, based on contributions.