- most players (especially players under 2000) do not care about the set-up,
- it is critical to have ONE standard mode,
- it is impossible to agree on what set-up is the best and the discussions can be endless, with always frustration for some participants who can't be pleased all,
...Therefore:
* ALL set-ups should be able to be launched and from the SAME space/room/lobby, not like now with 3 ghettos where no one goes (the person who creates the game chooses... And then those who want - either they like and know well this set-up or they do not care - join),
* ALL these games should count for the SAME FFA rating,
* the default mode should be "random set-up of 16" (which will please both those who do not care and those who estimate they're able to adapt to any set-up and just want to play a game ASAP).
That would:
- eliminate any further pointless discussion on the topic,
- significantly increase the number of the games available.
My main point and a very simple syllogism is:
- most players (especially players under 2000) do not care about the set-up,
- it is critical to have ONE standard mode,
- it is impossible to agree on what set-up is the best and the discussions can be endless, with always frustration for some participants who can't be pleased all,
...Therefore:
* ALL set-ups should be able to be launched and from the SAME space/room/lobby, not like now with 3 ghettos where no one goes (the person who creates the game chooses... And then those who want - either they like and know well this set-up or they do not care - join),
* ALL these games should count for the SAME FFA rating,
* the default mode should be "random set-up of 16" (which will please both those who do not care and those who estimate they're able to adapt to any set-up and just want to play a game ASAP).
That would:
- eliminate any further pointless discussion on the topic,
- significantly increase the number of the games available.