In that situation, if yellow is smart, he'll go after blue.
An accident
Sort:
Nov 27, 2017
0
#4
Blue not protecting his pawn payed his price to lose that pawn, it’s that simple really. Given red open to take, were it reversed you him you would have been able to and probably would’ve if you had seen like he did.
Look at the name and then look at the profile. The account was made a couple of weeks ago and the acct following them was made a few days before that. I'm going to guess that this is a "sock puppet" account that the person intends on using to cheat at 4 player chess either in teams or the free for all.
I could be totally wrong but only time will tell
I'm not too familiar with the game, but how does green have 30 points when he's only moved the king's pawn a few squares?
Dec 2, 2017
0
#8
borislasker schreef:
I'm not too familiar with the game, but how does green have 30 points when he's only moved the king's pawn a few squares?
I think this is an analysis after the game
Dec 4, 2017
0
#10
Not really
A poison pawn is a trap, this is just annoying the opponent
Dec 4, 2017
0
#12
Four player chess isn't always fair it's true, but should it be? I love the randomness and chaos of the game at low to mid levels and the cut-throat game theory enjoyed by the god tier players at the top of the leader boards.
Lie agnsu I also like the randomness of the game. I think that most players come across this kind of players once in a while. They are annoying but they aren't in the majority so In the long term it shouldn't affect your rating a lot.
In the meantime all you can do is try to improve your own game IMO.
So I just grabbed a free pawn and this happened
Soon he was focusing me with green and I lost in few moves later. He even sac his Queen on me just to keep me under pressure. Very unfair.