Bug Reports

Sort:
Avatar of ChessMasterGS

I'm going to ignore the blatantly offensive comment above me, as @LosChessquire stated;

chess.com/variants/glass-labyrinth/game/26798077/18/2

2nd and 3rd place both got +0, despite the fact that chat states +1 win and -1 loss

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3
ChessMasterGS wrote:

I'm going to ignore the blatantly offensive comment above me, as @LosChessquire stated;

chess.com/variants/glass-labyrinth/game/26798077/18/2

2nd and 3rd place both got +0, despite the fact that chat states +1 win and -1 loss

2nd and third tied on points...

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3

xD this is what the tab is called when i check my history

Is this a bug, a limitation of the code, or intentional?

Avatar of ChessMasterGS
1Username2awesome3 wrote:

 

xD this is what the tab is called when i check my history

Is this a bug, a limitation of the code, or intentional?

Bots have always appeared in the preview, but I haven't seen them appear as a "player" in the spectating tab until after the merge

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3
ChessMasterGS wrote:
1Username2awesome3 wrote:

 

xD this is what the tab is called when i check my history

Is this a bug, a limitation of the code, or intentional?

Bots have always appeared in the preview, but I haven't seen them appear as a "player" in the spectating tab until after the merge

thats a 2pc game

Avatar of ChessMasterGS
1Username2awesome3 wrote:
ChessMasterGS wrote:
1Username2awesome3 wrote:

 

xD this is what the tab is called when i check my history

Is this a bug, a limitation of the code, or intentional?

Bots have always appeared in the preview, but I haven't seen them appear as a "player" in the spectating tab until after the merge

thats a 2pc game

With bots in it?

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3
ChessMasterGS wrote:
1Username2awesome3 wrote:
ChessMasterGS wrote:
1Username2awesome3 wrote:

 

xD this is what the tab is called when i check my history

Is this a bug, a limitation of the code, or intentional?

Bots have always appeared in the preview, but I haven't seen them appear as a "player" in the spectating tab until after the merge

thats a 2pc game

With bots in it?

its the 2pc setup king of the hill

Avatar of farewell_to_kings

I am trying to block someone and I am getting the message "Forbidden". Please provide a resolution.

Avatar of acgusta2

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/27029577/51/4

In this game I found that after I blocked an Alibaba-rider check with my grasshopper I could not move my grasshopper to j8 even though it would still be blocking the Alibabas path to my king.  I found that this bug specifically affects grasshoppers that are blocking the path of an Alphil-rider, Dababa-rider, or Alibaba-riders path to the king.

Avatar of spacebar
farewell_to_kings wrote:

I am trying to block someone and I am getting the message "Forbidden". Please provide a resolution.

Are you trying to block a staff member? I think that's "forbidden". Otherwise, please send me a private message with the player you cannot block.

Avatar of Smith1016

I can't play anything

Avatar of spicatheredqueen1111
spacebar wrote:
farewell_to_kings wrote:

I am trying to block someone and I am getting the message "Forbidden". Please provide a resolution.

Are you trying to block a staff member? I think that's "forbidden". Otherwise, please send me a private message with the player you cannot block.

Hey spacebar, I have a bug to report. When I make a custom game ad want to test it with bots, I press the invite players button and try to invite bot using the invite futer or randobot button, but every time i press it it doesn't work, and when i try tying the names of the bots, it always shows that the bots aren't online.

Avatar of zackbuildit777

whenever a royal pawn is captured in a variant according to en passant, the piece is removed from the board but neither player loses, and instead the player with the missing royal seems to be able to continue forever. also, for some reason, moving into a position where your opponent could capture your royal pawn with en passant isn't marked as an illegal move or even as moving into check.

Avatar of MrXX2018

Don't even know, is it bug or a feature. Claiming win for draw. First time I see it

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/27081986/62/4

Recently I saw question about 'insuff. material'. Can anyone help me find it? Maybe it's related to my question

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3
MrXX2018 wrote:

Don't even know, is it bug or a feature. Claiming win for draw. First time I see it

https://www.chess.com/variants/custom/game/27081986/62/4

Recently I saw question about 'insuff. material'. Can anyone help me find it? Maybe it's related to my question

Red had one more point, so insuff material would win for him.

But I don't know why it was insuff. You can mate with an amazon...

Also, I think that N-check should not be listed as insuff unless there are only pieces that cannot check each other (i.e. royal king and royal king).

Avatar of SquashTheRoach

I'm not sure its strictly a bug, but I will post anyway.
I've noticed that on Anonymous 4 player games, if you are paying careful attention at the very beginning, you can catch a glimpse of the other players' photos. It's a fraction of a second, and you have to focus, but its there.
This is probably not a problem in most games. However in war for throne, where there are only about 50 active players, I do recognise photos and know who I'm playing against. 

Avatar of john_sparkman

4 player FFA - Player claims win wen there is still a lot of material on the board... I dont get it.... is this allowed?? or is it a bug?? There is definitely wining chances for both sides on this game...    Im almost positive I would have won this specific game tear.png 

https://www.chess.com/variants/4-player-chess/game/27170562/108/3

Also in 4 player FFA or teams - many times wen I go back a move to double check what my opponents just played the server suddenly breaks down and I have to reload the page (in many cases I loose because the server doesn't reconnect fast enough)  

Thanks 

Avatar of ChessMasterGS
john_sparkman wrote:

4 player FFA - Player claims win wen there is still a lot of material on the board... I dont get it.... is this allowed?? or is it a bug?? There is definitely wining chances for both sides on this game...    Im almost positive I would have won this specific game  

https://www.chess.com/variants/4-player-chess/game/27170562/108/3

Also in 4 player FFA or teams - many times wen I go back a move to double check what my opponents just played the server suddenly breaks down and I have to reload the page (in many cases I loose because the server doesn't reconnect fast enough)  

Thanks 

4PC is winning by points, not by last player standing.

Avatar of john_sparkman
ChessMasterGS escreveu:
john_sparkman wrote:

4 player FFA - Player claims win wen there is still a lot of material on the board... I dont get it.... is this allowed?? or is it a bug?? There is definitely wining chances for both sides on this game...    Im almost positive I would have won this specific game  

https://www.chess.com/variants/4-player-chess/game/27170562/108/3

Also in 4 player FFA or teams - many times wen I go back a move to double check what my opponents just played the server suddenly breaks down and I have to reload the page (in many cases I loose because the server doesn't reconnect fast enough)  

Thanks 

4PC is winning by points, not by last player standing.

As far as I know you can only claim the win wen there is no chance for the loosing player to catch up. Or else its just completely unfair...

Check out the game in the link... He had more points but I could have won that game and probably would have won it.

Avatar of 1Username2awesome3
john_sparkman wrote:
ChessMasterGS escreveu:
john_sparkman wrote:

4 player FFA - Player claims win wen there is still a lot of material on the board... I dont get it.... is this allowed?? or is it a bug?? There is definitely wining chances for both sides on this game...    Im almost positive I would have won this specific game  

https://www.chess.com/variants/4-player-chess/game/27170562/108/3

Also in 4 player FFA or teams - many times wen I go back a move to double check what my opponents just played the server suddenly breaks down and I have to reload the page (in many cases I loose because the server doesn't reconnect fast enough)  

Thanks 

4PC is winning by points, not by last player standing.

As far as I know you can only claim the win wen there is no chance for the loosing player to catch up. Or else its just completely unfair...

Check out the game in the link... He had more points but I could have won that game and probably would have won it.

wow you really havent played much 4pc before...