Bulletin: Member Analysis Submission!

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=864944165

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=864672875

Can this game of mine be fully analized? Thx...

P.S.My thougths during the game are in the game comment...

I'm posting this game because I think it has interesting moments of positional play, tactics, and prophylaxis.

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=830321266 

Active knights, weak squares, and open files :)

Here is a game that I played as per Roman's opening recommendation for black side of Sicillian Maroczy bind and finished it with a nice combination based on the theme of bank rank mate.

The game is captured in my blog here - http://dragonbishop.blogspot.com/2014/02/ashik-vs-arvind-sankar-ameteur-team.html

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=867566683 invoking dark square weaknesses and positional sacrifice

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=867575993

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=867578787

http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=868963443

http://www.chess.com/blog/pumpupthevolume247/my-12th-game-of-the-201314-season---a-win-with-a-razor-sharp-sicilian

Here is my link to a game where I made a blog post about it, I was on the black side of a Sicilian and faced the Smith-Morra gambit which I hadn't fared too well against previously, but after remembering some ideas gave to me by IM Rensch I managed to produce this game which I was really pleased with! My opponent was rated 1746 and I was rated 1626 at the time so the upset was nice - it would make great instructional content for intermediate players like myself reaching towards an advanced level (say 1800+)  

LOL @John_Rose - hilarious! BUT you guys need to ANALYZE your games to get considered

The-Tactic - dude, gives us some effort and we will pick ONE of your games - the Bulletin needs analysis! For serious players!

I been with chess.com for a long time and today I think I played a pretty instructive game and think that I can learn from my mistake with other here on chess.com with other members so I submit my game to you with my notes in hopes of improving my play alone with the chess.com community.  By the way its a game with me versus an FM in a standard G/15 with some endgame practical decisions where I volunteered a pawn in the ending to head towards familar grounds where I know I can hold vs. trying to win an endgame that he is most likely going to hold while retaining winning chances.  Well here it is.

This is the public vote chess game "Let's vote 960!" (3 days per move), which started on the 1st of may 2012 and ended more than a year later. Link to the game: http://www.chess.com/votechess/game?id=27162

 Many players considered the game to be very interesting, even epic, after a drawn-looking endgame slowly tranformed into a win for white, with white extensively analysing the endgame at a very high level.

Many players would love to see master level analysis on this game, especially the endgame! It's a very high level game and I suspect analysing it would take quite a bit of effort and time. But I really hope it can be done since there are thousands of players who participated in this game and would very much like to see analysis on it!

Below are the game moves with some basic comments by me. The comments are mainly from black's perspective since I was on the black team, and mainly on the second half of the game since I didn't join it until move 24. The much deeper and extensive analysis done on the moves can be found in the comment archives for the moves (even though some key analysers have been banned since and their comments got deleted).

Thanks in advance!

lol

Crushing the Sicillian in 20 no theory needed; just the will to win and attack!

I played a person about 200pts above inspired by GM Williams' latest video on the King's gambit I applied the same attack in my favorite variation of the sicilian (3.Bb5+) because its a simple plan for White but most master level players said White can't hope for much more than an equal position but as a class player it is bringing home the bacon!  I have not lost the White side of this position in tournaments(over the board) in over 2 years!  I give you this game because it is instructional attacking themes and its only 20 moves (opponent wanted to drag it out).  I humbly submit my game for your anaysis and review.

I recently played the following game in an OTB tournament (time control was G/90'+30" increment).  I think this is an interesting game because it was certainly back and forth.  White came out of the opening with a much better game and had a winning position, but couldn't find the win.  Black defended well, neutralized the pressure, and actually was better after several minor piece trades.  In mutual time pressure, black blundered instead of missing a nice drawing motif.