7 views and no comments....
CDT

..
yes CDT pos
currently, downloading links 1 & 2. read most of link 3. in this one [link 3] i think i fall on the fence. i am in the perturbative camp, i would say. ~ another; that, is: ....some QG, but, no LQG.

..
briefly to say ~:
~~ agreeing mainly with perturbation theory, that is:
a complicated quantum system in terms of a simpler one
..
YES to QG re: unifying QM and GR
..
NO to LQG, re: ..an extremely fine fabric or network "weaved" of finite quantised loops of excited gravitational fields et cetera. ~ YES, to: GR [within LQG], but, ~ NO [..really 50-50:] the exclusion of string theory's higher dimensions, NO spin networks etc ~
..
~ ~ general. sic
GR = general relativity
LQG = loop quantum gravity
QG = quantum gravity
QM = quantum mechanics
SR = special relativity

Well basically at the Planck Scale (10^-43 cm.) due to the uncertainty principle, particles and energy can "spontaneously" appear and quickly annihilate while still conserving energy laws. Since spacetime is curved, at sufficiently small scales the energy of the fluctuations would be sufficient enough to bend space to a foamy shape. This is only apparent at very small scales.
Having read and heard a little bit about Causal Dynamical Triangulations, I was wondering if anyone here has also even heard of it or knows more about it than I do (which is very likely if so!).
Links to movies about this:
http://loops05.aei.mpg.de/index_files/abstract_loll.html
http://loops05.aei.mpg.de/index_files/abstract_baez.html
One homepage (the other link was broken)
http://www.phys.uu.nl/~loll/Web/research/research.html
And
http://xstructure.inr.ac.ru/x-bin/theme3.py?level=2&index1=-24548
Thanks in advance!