It seems like a message to the broader forum would need to be formulated very well, or else it will be interpreted as a sign of separation -- not a good think when a new team has just been formed.
Ideas on how not to sound like we're disregarding "the will of masses" and forming a parallel discussion?
I assume we want it mostly targeted for participants who have not experienced previous such vote games (especially very large vote games) and for whom the notion might be quite new that there tend to be a few who occupy the airwaves with no meaningful message versus many who have a message but which gets drowned out in the noise.
This is it Members of the Chess.com Alliance! What the Alliance was created to do and what we have been practicing for this past year! We should start by recruiting vote chess players to bring the discussion here in fear of the trolls that harmed the last game. I wanted to make a post here because chess.com pings everyone when a new topic has been posted whereas it does not when a new Vote game is starting soon. Good Luck everybody! Let's WIN this for chess.com!!!
Btw, GM Onischuk is rated 200 points higher than GM Pogonina and she crushed us...we're doomed... :/
However I think we are better as a team this time around so hopefully it will go better.