hi everyone....that's it then...3 inaccurcey..2 mistakes..
1st one is my fault..5...e5 instead of e6, which was suggested by aurio...but please go back to archive and see what i wrote to be fair with me....it was the first move out of book, because i used to do so early in all my games, and believe me it works most of the time, specially when i play with players higher rated than i am...
2nd.....9.....a6...the vote was 100%...as all of us were looking for a plan depending on o-o-o...and we agreed that thier Nf5 won't be a problem, because of this we didn't move g6....but, going back it looked bad jump...and situation more that we agreed to let them take the B, and changed our plan by getting it back to f8, we lost a tepmo here,and closed our back area more...
3rd...14....Qa5...here i won't talk a lot, as i was completly against it, and explained my points, as i wasn't optimistic for the whole position , but i thougt we could manage till that move...where i stopped ....
at the end...i really got benefit of all of this...i admit that i 'm weak in the begining moves, that i'll depend on all of you in them...but trust me in the midgame moves...and let's continue in this way, i think we can progress much better in our rank,...we can start another game, Elizabeth, of 3 day...please, let's have our time and leave votting till every idea can be discussed fully....i have fun in discussions more than the game itself...and let's goooooo
Thank you Abddwairi, for analyzing the analysis! :) Definitely full of moves that we need to learn from. I started a game, 3 days per move. I see you already joined it. :) We've got some good strong opening players now, so we should be much better off!
analysing the analysis???????????.....i didn't notice that...
It's just what you were doing.
Here is the computer analysis of the game Real Teamwork: