the age of Frodo was fine. the whole Arwen thing was unnecessary. the other minor differences didn't really matter
Differences between books and movies
Sort:
the whole “Arwen thing” I think was necessary but the way it was done I’m not sure
I agree about Arwen
Also the whole thing about Aragorn not wanting to be king in the movie. He wanted to in the book
Yes that’s true
He was planning to be king all along
What do you think about Bilbo’s appearance in the LOTR movies? The book says that the called him “well-preserved, but unchanged would have been nearer to the mark”
Well, he was pretty young in the movie (for his age) you was different from the younger biblo because they had different actors do him
Biblo? 0_o
And I didn’t want to know why I just wanted to know if you thought it was a good change or not
Bilbo* XD
I don't think it was a big deal, I guess they thought he had to age at least a little
It’s not exactly “a little”
The movies have a lot of differences from the books. But which of these changes were necessary, helpful, and harmful? Discuss!