They did see it. They kicked him and another player out of the online Titled Tuesdays matches for cheating. He protested in the public chat but after that has disappeared...
Do you think GM Dlugy actually cheated in Titled Tuesday?
Sort:
logozar wrote:
How does this engine match thing work?
Can you test some of my serious games with engine match?
I tend to play quite seriously in my 15/10 games vs this specific opponent who I'm friends list, I'd be happy to post some (or all) of our recent slow games in this forum for testing.
when you have your game analyzed, it's the percentage of "best moves".
It's not relevant that engines sometimes do mistakes, the engine correlation is a poor tool to tell the quality of a specific game, but a high correlation may indicate well, that someone somehow correlated his move to those of an engine...
Analysing your own game would barely bring anything to the table, I got some 80-100 score on many of my miniature. It's easier to play the objectively strongest move against weak opposition, so different engine correlations can't be compared but under same circumstances, including time control and opposition. And even then, a single game is not enough, but 8 games including long ones should do.
Apr 11, 2017
0
#24
2Q1C wrote:
Logozar you are deluded. So chess.com got it wrong did they? You might like the guy but the evidence is overwhelming.
I don't buy what chess.com says about cheaters anymore. If you ask me I believe it is possible that chess.com was wrong in this Dlugy account, because I know they were wrong before in other accounts of said cheating. Don't think for a second that chess.com has a full proof way to prove that someone is cheating because they don't. Do you know that chess.com has a way to tell if the person playing on their online servers is using other software to aid in making their moves? I did not see any claim by chess.com that they checked this and found it positive. All they have is guesses, which have been known to be wrong. What you gave is not conclusive evidence. Tt is merely a bunch of numbers based on odds, and odds can be beaten.
One of these days someone is going to show what chess.com anti-cheating team for what it is, a bunch of conjectures, possibles, there is no 100% when it comes to them, it is just best to guess, based on something a computer told them and a bunch of other inferences. By definition, the whole anti-cheating process that chess.com uses is not conclusive. Just because someone performed a lot better than other people in a tournament doesn't necessarily mean they had outside help. It could mean they had a good day.
I would need a lot more information to be convinced that he was cheating. I'd need their actual process for coming up with these numbers, and they won't give it.
If he was cheating, chess.com would see it easily. The gain is not worth the risk for Dugly.