Just a weird thought...
I'm sure I'm not the only one to suffer from a partner who resigns early in team chess. Or gets cut off by the internet. So, just wondering...
What if the rule was that when one player resigns their partner gets to keep playing, just like in free for all? The resigning player gets a loss, but the player that continues on could, if he did amazingly well, pull out a win. Or at least get to try!!
So the rule would be that a player only loses if they resign or if they or their partner are mated (or have their king taken). The player who resigns or times out would have their pieces go grey, like in free for all.
If it was, it will be definitely good
Just a weird thought...
I'm sure I'm not the only one to suffer from a partner who resigns early in team chess. Or gets cut off by the internet. So, just wondering...
What if the rule was that when one player resigns their partner gets to keep playing, just like in free for all? The resigning player gets a loss, but the player that continues on could, if he did amazingly well, pull out a win. Or at least get to try!!
So the rule would be that a player only loses if they resign or if they or their partner are mated (or have their king taken). The player who resigns or times out would have their pieces go grey, like in free for all.