idk what to analyze you basically did everything right
Get your game analyzed here
Sort:
Jun 28, 2021
0
#23
Viznik wrote:
Pinned because this is a good resource
only took you like two weeks -_-
Jun 29, 2021
0
#26
Definitely not deserved brilliant move against @icyboyyy!! Also what can I do better besides not hang pieces?
Link for proof: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/18753607651?tab=report
Jun 29, 2021
0
#28
DaBabysBurner wrote:
wait, you want your game annotated??
yes... I think...
Jun 29, 2021
0
#32
wait not really "hanging a bishop" because white takes the rook but then black plays rc2 and black had forced mate after like qf3+, king somewhere and then the queen rook battery bullies the king into the corner
Jun 29, 2021
0
#33
DaBabysBurner wrote:
wait not really "hanging a bishop" because white takes the rook but then black plays rc2 and black had forced mate after like qf3+, king somewhere and then the queen rook battery bullies the king into the corner
Ng4, which both him and me missed in our calculations. That's why he didn't take, and why I played Ba3 in the first place. The rook thing was... not a calculation error...
Jun 29, 2021
0
#35
DaBabysBurner wrote:
ng4 works too but rc2 is faster
huh... wow we're both bad...
Jul 3, 2021
0
#36
This is one of my most recent games. Tried out the Scandinavian, but didn't much care for it, a little too agressive for me. But I still like some insight to this game.
Jul 3, 2021
0
#38
Generally those 0-0-0 Scandinavian lines are pretty overrated.
This is the dream position in the Scandinavian
Kinda
are you white or black because white literally didn't do anything wrong